Advertisement

Carbon Capture and Renewables: Strategic Conflicts or Tactical Complementarities

  • David ElliottEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

While coal use is being challenged around the world, renewable energy is accelerating ahead and those who back the latter strongly often feel that any talk of finding ways to reduce the impact of continuing to use fossil fuel risks deflecting or slowing the growth of renewables. However, it is still the case that fossil fuels remain the dominant energy suppliers, and they will be so for some while. In which case, if carbon emission reduction is seen as urgent, then clean-up options are also urgent, if only perhaps as an interim measure. This chapter looks at some of the key options for abating emissions from the combustion of fossil fuel, focussing on the various types of carbon capture, their potentials and problems and possible conflicts or complementarities with renewables. While the prospects for carbon capture do not look good at present, it is argued that some of the technologies may have an interim role, but that is set in the context of diminishing reliance on fossil fuel.

Keywords

Carbon capture Renewable energy Direct air capture Hydrogen Power to gas Energy storage 

References

  1. Abbess, J. 2015. Renewable Gas. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ACS. 2015. “Diamonds from the Sky” Approach Turns CO2 into Valuable Products. American Chemical Society News, August 19. https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/pressroom/newsreleases/2015/august/CO2.html.
  3. Allen, M. 2016. Drivers of Peak Warming in a Consumption-maximizing World. Nature Climate Change 6: 684–686. http://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate2977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ambrose, J. 2018. Energy Networks Prepare to Blend Hydrogen into the Gas Grid for the First Time. The Telegraph, January 6. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2018/01/06/hydrogen/.
  5. Atlas Obscura. 2013. Lake Nyos Suffocated Over 1,746 People in a Single Night. Slate. http://www.slate.com/blogs/atlas_obscura/2013/07/26/lake_nyos_killed_1746_when_it_released_a_huge_pocket_of_CO2.html.
  6. BEIS. 2017. Clean Growth Strategy. UK Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, London. http://www.gov.uk/government/publications/clean-growth-strategy.
  7. BEIS. 2018. Updated Energy and Emissions Projections 2017. UK Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, London. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/671187/Updated_energy_and_emissions_projections_2017.pdf.
  8. Biofuelwatch. 2015. Last-ditch Climate Option, or Wishful Thinking? Biofuelwatch BECCS report. http://www.biofuelwatch.org.uk/2015/beccs-report/.
  9. Brack, D. 2017. Woody Biomass for Power and Heat Impacts on the Global Climate. London: Chatham Horse. http://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/files/chathamhouse/publications/research/2017-02-23-woody-biomass-global-climate-brack-embargoed.pdf.Google Scholar
  10. Butera, G., Jensen, S.H. and Claussen, L. R. 2018. A Novel System for Large-scale Storage of Electricity as Synthetic Natural Gas Using Reversible Pressurized Solid Oxide Cells. Energy 166(1): 738–754. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218320693?via%3Dihub.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cadent. 2017. The Liverpool-Manchester Hydrogen Cluster: A Low Cost Deliverable Project, Report by Progressive Energy Ltd August. https://cadentgas.com/about-us/innovation/projects/liverpool-manchester-hydrogen-cluster.
  12. Cameron, D. 2016. House of Commons Liaison Committee, Oral Evidence: Evidence from the Prime Minister. Q 79-Q83, HC 712, January 12. http://data.parliament.uk/WrittenEvidence/CommitteeEvidence.svc/EvidenceDocument/liaison/evidence-from-the-prime-minister-12-january-2016/oral/26761.htm.
  13. Cao, L. and Caldeira, K. 2010. Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Removal: Long-term Consequences and Commitment. Environmental Research Letters 5, 024011. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/024011/pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carbon Brief. 2016. In-depth: Experts Assess the Feasibility of ‘Negative Emissions’. Carbon Brief Review of Expert Opinions, April 12. http://www.carbonbrief.org/in-depth-experts-assess-the-feasibility-of-negative-emissions.
  15. CCC. 2018. Biomass in a Low-Carbon Economy, Committee on Climate Change, London. http://www.theccc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Biomass-in-a-low-carbon-economy-CCC-2018.pdf/.
  16. CCSA. 2018. Carbon Capture and Storage Association Web Site. http://www.ccsassociation.org/what-is-ccs/.
  17. CER. 2018. China Slashing Coal Power Capacity at Rapid Rate. China Economic Review, March 2. https://chinaeconomicreview.com/china-slashing-coal-power-capacity-at-rapid-rate/.
  18. Chris, R. 2015. Systems Thinking for Geoengineering Policy. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Climate Action. 2017. Australian Steelworks Aims to Unite Renewable Energy with Heavy Industry. Climate Action, October 31. http://www.climateactionprogramme.org/news/australian-steelworks-aims-to-unite-renewable-energy-with-heavy-industry.
  20. Cook, T. and Elliott, D. 2018. Renewable Energy: From Europe to Africa. Basingstoke: Palgrave Pivot.Google Scholar
  21. Cooley, G. 2017. We Need Long Term, Large-scale Energy Storage Solutions. Medium Blog by ITM Power CEO Graham Cooley, September 22. https://medium.com/@cH2ange/graham-cooley-we-need-long-term-large-scale-energy-storage-solutions-b30f79f11f54.
  22. Crew, B. 2015. Scientists are Building a System That Could Turn Atmospheric CO2 into Fuel. Science Alert, July 22. http://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-are-building-a-system-that-could-turn-atmospheric-CO2-into-fuel.
  23. Cuff, M. 2017a. Norway Proposes Major Cuts to Carbon Capture and Storage Budget. Business Green, October 16. http://www.businessgreen.com/bg/news/3019206/norway-slashes-carbon-capture-and-storage-budget.
  24. Cuff, M. 2017b. Climeworks Flicks Switch on ‘World First’ Atmospheric Carbon Capture Plant. Business Green, October 11. https://www.businessgreen.com/bg/news/3019003/climeworks-flicks-switch-on-world-first-iceland-plant-sucking-and-storing-CO2.
  25. Cuff, M. 2018. CCS Group Captures £900,000 Government Grant. Business Green, February 14. http://www.businessgreen.com/bg/news/3026633/ccs-group-captures-gbp900-000-beis-grant.
  26. DECC. 2015. Carbon Capture and Storage Knowledge Sharing: Commercial, Project Management and Lessons Learned. Department of Energy and Climate Change, London. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/carbon-capture-and-storage-knowledge-sharing-commercial-project-management-and-lessons-learned.
  27. De Clercq, G. 2017. Engie Plans to go Green Via Biogas and Renewable Hydrogen. Business Insider, December 4. http://uk.businessinsider.com/r-engie-plans-to-go-green-via-biogas-and-renewable-hydrogen-2017-12.
  28. Dimitriou, I., García-Gutiérrez, P., Elder, R., Cuéllar-Franca, R., Azapagic, A. and Allen, R. 2015. Carbon Dioxide Utilisation for Production of Transport Fuels: Process and Economic Analysis. Energy and Environmental Science (6). http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2015/ee/c4ee04117h-!divAbstract.
  29. Drax. 2018. Europe’s First Bioenergy Carbon Capture and Storage Pilot Now Underway. Drax Company Press Release, November 26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218320693?via%3Dihub.
  30. EASAC. 2018. Negative Emission Technologies: What Role in Meeting Paris Agreement Targets? European Academies’ Science Advisory Council, Halle. https://easac.eu/publications/details/easac-net/.
  31. ECCSC. 2016. Future of Carbon Capture and Storage in the UK. House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Select Committee, Second Report of Session 2015–16. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201516/cmselect/cmenergy/692/692.pdf.
  32. Edwards, P. and Thomas, J. 2017. Letter to The Times, August 14.Google Scholar
  33. EIA. 2017. Petra Nova is One of Two Carbon Capture and Sequestration Power Plants in the World. US Energy Information Agency Data Sheet. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=33552.
  34. Elliott, D. 2016. Balancing Green Power. Bristol: Institute of Physics Publications.Google Scholar
  35. Elliott, D. 2017. Nuclear Power: Past, Present and Future. Bristol: Institute of Physics Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. ETI. 2015. ETI Comment on the Scrapping of the £1bn CCS Commercialisation Competition. Energy Technologies Institute, November 27. http://www.eti.co.uk/news/eti-comment-on-the-scrapping-of-the-1bn-ccs-commercialisation-competition/.
  37. ETI. 2017. Carbon Capture and Storage Needs to be Part of the UK’s Future Energy System or We Will Face “Substantially Higher Costs”. Energy Technologies Institute Article in Politics Home, April 4. https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/energy/opinion/energy-technologies-institute/84830/carbon-capture-and-storage-needs-be-part/.
  38. Evans, S. 2018. World Can Limit Global Warming to 1.5°C Without BECCS. Carbon Brief, April 13. http://www.carbonbrief.org/world-can-limit-global-warming-to-onepointfive-without-beccs.
  39. Fehrenbacher, K. 2017. Carbon Capture Suffers a Huge Setback as Kemper Plant Suspends Work. Greentech Media, June 29. https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/carbon-capture-suffers-a-huge-setback-as-kemper-plant-suspends-work-gs.XPab7k4.
  40. Gammer, D. and Newton-Cross, G. 2016. The Evidence for Deploying Bioenergy with CCS (BECCS) in the UK. Energy Technologies Institute, Loughborough. http://www.eti.co.uk/insights/the-evidence-for-deploying-bioenergy-with-ccs-beccs-in-the-uk.
  41. GCCSI. 2017. The Global Status of CCS. Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute. http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/status.
  42. GCCSI. 2018. Large-scale CCS Facilities, Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute. http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/projects/large-scale-ccs-projects.
  43. Gorder, P. 2018. A Fossil Fuel Technology that Doesn’t Pollute. Ohio State University News, January 2. https://news.osu.edu/news/2018/01/02/a-fossil-fuel-technology-that-doesnt-pollute.
  44. Gough, C. and Vaughan, N. 2015. Synthesising Existing Knowledge on the Feasibility of BECCS, DECC Supported Avoid Programme, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Manchester, Grantham Institute, Imperial College London, Walker Institute, University of Reading. http://www.avoid.uk.net/2015/07/synthesising-existing-knowledge-on-the-feasibility-of-beccs/.
  45. Hausfather, Z. 2018. Analysis: How ‘Natural Climate Solutions’ Can Reduce the Need for BECCS. Climate Brief, May 21. http://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-how-natural-climate-solutions-can-reduce-the-need-for-beccs.
  46. Homes à Court, S. 2017. Does the Best CCS Power Station in the World Provide a Model for Australia? Quora, November 9. https://www.quora.com/Does-the-best-CCS-power-station-in-the-world-provide-a-model-for-Australia.
  47. Hughes, G. 2017. The Bottomless Pit. Global Warming Policy Foundation, London. http://www.thegwpf.org/content/uploads/2017/06/CCS-Report.pdf.
  48. Hydrogenics. 2018. Hydrogenics Power to Gas Entry of Their Commercial Web Site. http://www.hydrogenics.com/wp-content/uploads/power-to-gas-4pg-brochure-2012.pdf.
  49. IEA. 2015. Integrated Carbon Capture and Storage Project at SaskPower’s Boundary Dam Power Station. International Energy Agency GHG Programme Report, Cheltenham. http://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/2015-06.pdf.
  50. IEA. 2018. International Energy Agency GHG Programme. Information Sheets and Reports. http://ieaghg.org/ccs-resources/what-is-ccs.
  51. IMechE. 2018. Energy from Gas: Taking a Whole System Approach. Institution of Mechanical Engineers, London. http://www.imeche.org/news/news-article/new-report-using-gas-grid-to-store-excess-electricity-could-boost-uk-renewables.
  52. IPCC. 2017. Fifth Assessment Report, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva. http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/index.shtml.
  53. IRENA. 2017. Perspectives for the Energy Transition: Investment Needs for a Low-carbon Energy System. International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi, Joint report with the International Energy Agency. http://www.irena.org/menu/index.aspx?mnu=Subcat&PriMenuID=36&CatID=141&SubcatID=3828.
  54. ITM Power. 2018. ITM Power Company Web Site. http://www.itm-power.com/project/rwe-power-to-gas.
  55. Jacobson, M., Delucchi, M. Bauer, Z., Goodman, S., Chapman, W., Cameron, M., Bozonnat, C., Chobadi, L., Clonts, H., Enevoldsen, P., Erwin, J., Fobi, S., Goldstrom, O., Hennessy, E., Liu, J., Lo, J., Meyer, C., Morris, S. and Yachanin, A. 2017. 100% Clean and Renewable Wind, Water, and Sunlight All-Sector Energy Roadmaps for 139 Countries of the World. Joule 1(1): 108–121. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542435117300120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Keane, K. 2018. UK’s First Carbon Capture and Storage Project ‘Operational by Mid 2020s’. BBC News report, November 28. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-business-46358715
  57. Keay, M. 2018. Decarbonisation of Heat and the Role of ‘Green Gas’ in the United Kingdom. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Decarbonisation-of-heat-and-the-role-of-green-gas’-in-the-United-Kingdom-NG-128.pdf.
  58. Keller, D., Young, F. and Oschlies, A. 2014. Potential Climate Engineering Effectiveness and Side Effects During a High Carbon Dioxide-Emission Scenario. Nature Communications 5, No. 3304. http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2014/140225/ncomms4304/full/ncomms4304.html.
  59. Kriegler, E., Luderer, G., Bauer, N., Baumstark, L., Fujimori, S., Popp, A, Rogelj, J., Streer, J. and van Vuuren, D. 2018. Pathways Limiting Warming to 1.5°C: A Tale of Turning Around in No Time? Royal Society, Philosophical Transactions B. http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/roypta/376/2119/20160457.full.pdf.
  60. Lackner, K. 2015. The Need for Negative Carbon Emissions and Direct Capture from Air. Power Point Presentation, Arizona State University. https://absuploads.aps.org/presentation.cfm?pid=11396.
  61. Lowe, J. 2016. Do We Need BECCS to Avoid Dangerous Climate Change? Guest Post. Carbon Brief, April 14. https://www.carbonbrief.org/guest-post-do-we-need-beccs-to-avoid-dangerous-climate-change.
  62. Lowes, R. 2016. Heat Decarbonisation Calls for Proven Technology. UK Energy Research Centre Blog, August 11. http://www.ukerc.ac.uk/network/network-news/heat-decarbonisation-calls-for-proven-technology.html.
  63. Morgan, J. 2013. Zero Emission Syn-fuel from Sea Water. Brave New Climate Blog, January 16. https://bravenewclimate.com/2013/01/16/zero-emission-synfuel-from-seawater.
  64. Musaddique, S. 2017. Wind Turbines Could Power Scottish Smelter and Steel Plants. The Independent, September 6. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/wind-turbines-scotland-smelter-steel-plants-mills-highlands-gfc-alliance-motherwell-a7932946.html.
  65. Newton-Cross, G. and Evans, H. 2015. Delivering Greenhouse Gas Emission Savings through UK Bioenergy Value Chains. Energy Technologies Institute, Loughborough. http://www.eti.co.uk/insights/delivering-greenhouse-gas-emission-savings-through-uk-bioenergy-value-chains.
  66. Novek, E., Shaulsky, E., Fishman, Z., Pfefferle, L. and Elimelech, M. 2016. Low-Temperature Carbon Capture Using Aqueous Ammonia and Organic Solvents. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 3(8): 291–296. http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ogleby, G. 2018. Are We a Step Closer to Achieving the ‘Green Hydrogen Economy’? Eddies News Service, January 17. https://www.edie.net/news/6/Could-the%2D%2Dgreen-hydrogen%2D%2Deconomy-be-set-for-take-off-/.
  68. Ondrey, G. 2015. Modified MOFS Could Cut Carbon-Capture Costs in Half. Chemical Engineering, April 1. http://www.chemengonline.com/modified-mofs-cut-carbon-capture-costs-half/.
  69. Oxburgh, R. 2016. Lowest Cost Decarbonisation for the UK: The Critical Role of CCS. Report to the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy from the Parliamentary Advisory Group on Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), September. https://gallery.mailchimp.com/4ba4a05396f0bf7eac512a9b0/files/Parliamentary_Advisory_Group_on_CCS_Final_report_VERSION_TO_PUBLISH.pdf.
  70. Papageorgiou, N. 2014. A Cost-effective and Energy-efficient Approach to Carbon Capture. News Mediacom EPFL, October 13. https://actu.epfl.ch/news/a-cost-effective-and-energy-efficient-approach-to-/.
  71. Peters, A. 2017. This Machine Just Started Sucking CO2 Out of the Air to Save us from Climate Change. Fast Company News, May 31. https://www.fastcompany.com/40421871/this-machine-just-started-sucking-CO2-out-of-the-air-to-save-us-from-climate-change.
  72. REM. 2017. Sheffield Forge Could be the First in the UK to be Powered by Biomass and Biogas. Renewable Energy Magazine, November 17. http://www.renewableenergymagazine.com/biomass/sheffield-forge-could-be-the-first-in-20171117.
  73. Richard, C. 2018. Cost of Wind-generated Hydrogen to Fall Below Natural Gas. Wind Power Monthly, April 28. https://www.windpowermonthly.com/article/1462904/cost-wind-generated-hydrogen-fall-below-natural-gas.
  74. Sattar, A., Leeke, G., Hornung, A. and Wood, J. 2014. Steam Gasification of Rapeseed, Wood, Sewage Sludge and Miscanthus Biochars for the Production of a Hydrogen-rich Syngas. Biomass and Bioenergy 69: 276–286. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953414003663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Shepherd, J. 2018. Silver Bullet to Suck CO2 from Air and Halt Climate Change Ruled Out. The Guardian, February 1. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/feb/01/silver-bullet-to-suck-CO2-from-air-and-halt-climate-change-ruled-out.
  76. Simon, F. 2017. “Game Over” for CCS, Driven Out by Cheap Renewables. Euractiv EU News Service, December 4. http://www.euractiv.com/section/climate-environment/news/game-over-for-ccs-driven-out-by-cheap-renewable.
  77. Sky, J. 2014. Power-to-Gas May Solve Renewables Storage Challenge. DW News Deutsche Welle, July 2. http://www.dw.com/en/power-to-gas-may-solve-renewables-storage-challenge/a-17754416.
  78. Sulleyman, A. 2018. Researchers Discover New Catalyst for Efficiently Recycling Waste Carbon Dioxide into Plastic. The Independent, January 16. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/carbon-dioxide-greenhouse-gases-plastic-polyethylene-copper-catalyst-climate-change-a8162636.html.
  79. Tzimas, E. 2011. Sustainable or Not? Impacts and Uncertainties of Low-Carbon Energy Technologies on Water, EC JRC/AAAS Presentation. http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/jrc/downloads/jrc_aaas2011_energy_water_tzimas.pdf.
  80. Tovey, A. 2017. GFG Alliance Reveals Strategy to Increase UK Steel Production to 5m Tonnes. The Telegraph, November 27. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2017/11/27/gfg-alliance-reveals-strategy-increase-uk-steel-production-5m/.
  81. van Vuuren, D., Stehfest, E., Gernaat, D., van den Berg, M., Bijl, D., Sytze de Boer, H., Daioglou, V., Doelman, J., Edelenbosch, O., Harmsen, M., Hof, A. and van Sluisveld, M. 2018. Alternative Pathways to the 1.5°C Target Reduce the Need for Negative Emission Technologies. Nature Climate Change. http://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-018-0119-8.
  82. Victor, D., Akimoto, K., Kaya, Y., Yamaguchi, M., Cullenwaatrd, D. and Hepburn, C. 2017. Prove Paris Was More Than Paper Promises. Nature, August 1. http://www.nature.com/news/prove-paris-was-more-than-paper-promises-1.22378.
  83. Vidal, J. 2018. How Bill Gates Aims to Clean Up the Planet. The Observer, February 4. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/feb/04/carbon-emissions-negative-emissions-technologies-capture-storage-bill-gates.
  84. Williamson, P. 2016. Emissions Reduction: Scrutinize CO2 Removal Methods. Nature 530 (7589). http://www.nature.com/news/emissions-reduction-scrutinize-CO2-removal-methods-1.19318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wiltshire, A. and Davies-Barnard, T. 2015. Planetary Limits to BECCS Negative Emissions, Avoid 2. Met Office, Grantham Institute, Tyndall Centre, Walker Institute. http://avoid-net-uk.cc.ic.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/delightful-downloads/2015/07/Planetary-limits-to-BECCS-negative-emissions-AVOID-2_WPD2a_v1.1.pdf.
  86. Windgas. 2017. Windgas for the Energy Transition: Uniper Lays Cornerstone for Methanation Plant. Press Release for Uniper project, Uniper and Partners, July 6. https://www.storeandgo.info/fileadmin/press_releases/20160705_PM_Grundstein_Falkenhagen_StoreGo_ENG.pdf.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Engineering & InnovationOpen UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations