Advertisement

The Populist Debasing of Social Theory: Liberation Psychology, Cultural-Historical Psychology, and Historical Materialism

  • Carl RatnerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Critical Theory and Practice in Psychology and the Human Sciences book series (CTPPHS)

Abstract

This chapter examines populism in social theory, as opposed to populist political movements in Chap.  5. We demonstrate that populists have misinterpreted emancipatory social theories such as Liberation Psychology, cultural-historical psychology, and historical materialism. We engage in textual analyses of these populist interpretations. They have sought to reduce objective, structural, political-economic, historical-materialist cornerstones of these three social theories to individual, interpersonal, subjectivistic constructs. They often pay lip service to the founders of these theories while distorting their ideas. We shall critique the populist misinterpretations. They contradict the original writings, and they contradict the scientific evidence that supports the original writings.

Keywords

Liberation Psychology Psychoanalysis Revisionism Cultural-historical activity theory Montero Subjectivism Agency 

References

  1. Beckett, P. (1973). Algeria vs. Fanon: The theory of revolutionary decolonization, and the Algerian experience. The Western Political Quarterly, 26, 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Best, B., Bonefeld, W., & O’Kane, C. (2018). The Sage handbook of Frankfurt school critical theory (3 vols.). New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Boschma, J., & Brownstein, R. (2016, February 29). The concentration of poverty in American schools. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2016/02/concentration-poverty-american-schools/471414/
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinctions. A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Byrd, C. (2017). Poison in the Ivy: Race relations and the reproduction of inequality on elite college campuses. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Frank, T. (2005). What’s the matter with Kansas? How conservatives won the heart of America. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  7. Fromm, E. (1978). The method and function of an analytical social psychology. Notes on psychoanalysis and historical materialism. In A. Arato & E. Gebhardt (Eds.), The essential Frankfurt school reader (pp. 477–496). New York: Urizen Books. Originally published 1932.Google Scholar
  8. Ghodsee, K. (2018). Why women have better sex under socialism. New York: Nation Books.Google Scholar
  9. Ghodsee, K., & Mead, J. (2018). What has socialism ever done for women? Catalyst, 2(2), 101–133.Google Scholar
  10. Jimenez-Dominguez, B. (2009). Ignacio Martín-Baró’s social psychology of liberation: Situated knowledge and critical commitment against objectivism. In M. Montero & C. Sonn (Eds.), Psychology of liberation: Theory and applications (pp. 37–50). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Harrington, C. (2019, forthcoming). Neo-liberal subjectivity, self-branding and ‘My Rape Story’ YouTube videos. Critical Sociology.Google Scholar
  12. Heath, A., & Di Stasio, V. (2019, forthcoming). Racial discrimination in Britain, 1969–2017: A meta-analysis of field experiments on racial discrimination in the British labour market. British Journal of Sociology.Google Scholar
  13. Khazan, O. (2018, July). Being Black in America can be hazardous to your health. Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/07/being-black-in-america-can-be-hazardous-to-your-health/561740/
  14. Martin-Baro, I. (1994). Writings for a liberation psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1964). The German ideology. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1975). Collected works (Vol. 3). New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1976). Collected works (Vol. 4). New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Montero, M. (2009). Methods for liberation: Critical consciousness in action. In M. Montero & C. Sonn (Eds.), Psychology of liberation: Theory and applications (pp. 73–91). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Montero, M. (2017). Psychology of liberation revised. In B. Gough (Ed.), Palgrave handbook of critical psychology (pp. 147–162). New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  20. Montero, M., & Sonn, C. (Eds.). (2009). Psychology of liberation: Theory and applications. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Nardi, B. (2017). Review of The transformative mind: Expanding Vygotsky’s approach to development and education, by Anna Stetsenko. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 24(4), 393–396.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2017.1346687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pavon-Cuellar, D. (2017). Why gender violence cannot be explained by class violence: Marxism, psychoanalysis and the sexual-familiar foundation of political-economic oppression. Teoría y Crítica de la Psicología, 9, 244–253.Google Scholar
  23. Perinbam, M. (1973). Fanon and the revolutionary peasantry – The Algerian case. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 11(3), 427–445. http://www.teocripsi.com/ojs/ (ISSN: 2116-3480).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ratner, C. (1993). Review of D’Andrade & Strauss, Human motives and cultural models. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 14, 89–94.Google Scholar
  25. Ratner, C. (2002). Subjectivity and objectivity in qualitative research. Forum Qualitative Social Research (online journal), 3(3). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/829
  26. Ratner, C. (2005). Social constructionism as cultism. Forum qualitative Sozialforschung/forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(2), Art. 13. http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-05/05-2-13-e.htm
  27. Ratner, C. (2006). Epistemological, social, and political conundrums in social constructionism. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 6(3). (online at my web site).Google Scholar
  28. Ratner, C. (2009). Harre’s social philosophy and political philosophy: A social scientific critique. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 39(4), 448–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ratner, C. (2012). Macro cultural psychology. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 207–237). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Ratner, C. (2014). Macro cultural psychology. In T. Teo (Ed.), The encyclopedia of critical psychology. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ratner, C. (2015). Classic and revisionist sociocultural theory and their analyses of expressive language: An empirical assessment. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 2, 51–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ratner, C. (2016). Culture-centric vs. person-centered cultural psychology and political philosophy. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 3, 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ratner, C. (2017a). Marxist psychology, Vygotsky’s cultural psychology, and psychoanalysis: The double helix of science and politics. In C. Ratner & D. Nunes (Eds.), Vygotsky and Marx: Toward a Marxist psychology (pp. 27–108). London: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ratner, C. (2017b). The discrepancy between macro culture and individual, lived psychology: An ethnographic example of Chinese moral behavior. Culture & Psychology, 23, 356–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ratner, C. (2018a). Trends within sociocultural theory, and the utility of “cultural capital” for SCT. In J. Lantolf, M. Poehenr, M. Swain (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sociocultural theory and second language learning and teaching. New York: Routledge. Available on my web page: http://www.sonic.net/~cr2
  36. Ratner, C. (2018b). The genesis of macro cultural psychology’s culture theory from traditional cultural psychology. In G. Jovanović, L. Allolio-Näcke, & C. Ratner (Eds.), The challenges of cultural psychology: Historical legacies and future responsibilities (pp. 369–395). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Ratner, C. (2018c). The genesis of macro cultural psychology’s political orientation from other approaches to cultural psychology. In G. Jovanović, L. Allolio-Näcke, & C. Ratner (Eds.), The challenges of cultural psychology: Historical legacies and future responsibilities (pp. 396–418). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Ratner, C. (2019). Neoliberal psychology. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ratner, C., & Nunes, D. (2017c). Recovering and advancing Vygotsky’s Marxist psychology. In C. Ratner & D. Nunes (Eds.), Vygotksy and Marx toward a Marxist psychology (pp. 1–26). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  40. Sartre, J.-P. (1963). Search for a method. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  41. Stetsenko, A. (2013). The challenge of individuality in cultural-historical activity theory: “Collectividual” dialectics from a transformative activist stance. Outlines-Critical Practice Studies, 14(2). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265047866_The_Challenge_of_Individuality_in_Cultural-_Historical_Activity_Theory_Collectividual_Dialectics_from_a_Transformative_Activist_Stance
  42. Stetsenko, A. (2018). Nature culture in a transformative worldview. In G. Jovanović, L. Allolio-Näcke, & C. Ratner (Eds.), The challenges of cultural psychology: Historical legacies and future responsibilities (pp. 37–56). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Taylor, K. (2019, March 13). Succeeding while black. Boston Review. https://bostonreview.net/race/keeanga-yamahtta-taylor-succeeding-while-black
  44. Vygotsky, L. S. (1994). The socialist alteration of man. In R. Van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 175–184). Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  45. Vygotsky, L. (1997a). Collected works (Vol. 3). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  46. Vygotsky, L. (1997b). Educational psychology. Boca Raton: St. Lucie Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Cultural Research and EducationTrinidadUSA

Personalised recommendations