Advertisement

The 4E Expression

  • Victoria OrangeEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, a definition of Expression as it is seen here is outlined. The main sub-components of Expression are described and an explanation of why it is a complex adaptive system and what its role in the interaction supercomplex adaptive system is offered. The sub-components of Expression are put forward as being Language, Non-Verbal Communication and Art. These are described drawing on the most pertinent literature and it is shown how they are interconnected in the interaction supercomplex adaptive system. The role of this 4E in the overarching system is outlined. Finally, a detailed example of Expression in interaction can be applied in everyday life is given with a commentary.

Keywords

Expression Language Non-Verbal communication Art Everyday life 

References

  1. Allard, E. 2017. Re-examining teacher translanguaging: An ecological perspective. Bilingual Research Journal 40 (2): 116–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baicchi, A. 2015. Construction learning as a complex adaptive system. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnlund, D. 2008. A transactional model of communication. In Communication theory, ed. C. D. Mortensen, 2nd ed., 47–57. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beckner, C., R. Blythe, J. Bybee, M. Christiansen, W. Croft, N. Ellis, J. Holland, J. Ke, D. Larsen-Freeman, and T. Schoenemann. 2009. Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning 59: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bot, K., W. Lowie, and M. Verspoor. 2005. Second language acquisition. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carroll, Noël. 2004. Art and human nature. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62 (2): 95–107. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1559194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Casti, J., and A. Karlqvist. 2003. Art and complexity. Burlington: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  8. De Bot, K., W. Lowie, and M. Verspoor (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10 (1): 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellis, N. 2009. Language as a complex adaptive system. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. García, O., and R. Otheguy. 2014. Spanish and Hispanic bilingualism. In The Routledge handbook of Hispanic applied linguistics (Chapter three), ed. Manel Lacorte, 639–658. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. García, O., and H. Baetens Beardsmore. 2013. Bilingual education in the 21st century. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Griffin, M. 2015. Art as communication. The International Encyclopedia of Communication 1–5.Google Scholar
  13. Hall, S. 1980. Cultural studies: Two paradigms. Media, Culture and Society 2 (1): 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Halsall, F. 2008. Systems of art. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  15. Hargie, O. 2011. Skilled interpersonal communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Harris, Roy, trans. and annot. 1983. Course in general linguistics. London: Duckworth. La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1998, 236pp; Bloomsbury, 2013, ARG, 2nd edition.Google Scholar
  17. Hébert, L. 2011. The functions of language. In Louis Hébert (dir.), Signo. [Online] Rimouski (Quebec).Google Scholar
  18. Hindawi.com. (2019). Complex systems in aesthetics and arts. [Online] Available at https://www.hindawi.com/journals/complexity/si/847358/cfp/. Accessed 26 March 2019.
  19. Knapp, M., J. Hall, and T. Horgan. 2013. Nonverbal communication in human interaction. Boston: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  20. Kramsch, C. 2012. Why is everyone so excited about complexity theory in applied linguistics? Mélanges CRAPEL. [Online] 33(Numéro Spécial). Available at http://www.atilf.fr/spip.php?rubrique618. Accessed 26 March 2019.
  21. Larsen-Freeman, D. 1997. Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 18 (2): 141–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Larsen-Freeman, D. 2002. Making sense of frequency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24 (2): 275–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Larsen-Freeman, D. 2011. A complexity approach to second language development/acquisition. In Alternative approaches to second language acquisition, ed. Dwight Atkinson, 48–72. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Larsen-Freeman, D., and L. Cameron. 2008. Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0194422444.Google Scholar
  25. Leach, E. 1982. Social anthropology, 107. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Leech, G. 1974. Semantics. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin.Google Scholar
  27. Leverone, R. 2016. Crowds as complex adaptive systems: Strategic implications for law enforcement. Homeland Security Digital Library, Naval Postgraduate School. [Online] Available at https://www.hsdl.org/?abstractanddid=792229. Accessed 26 March 2019.
  28. MacSwan, J. 2017. A multilingual perspective on translanguaging. American Educational Research Journal 54 (1): 167–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Makoni, S., and A. Pennycook. 2007. Disinventing and reconstituting languages, 1–41. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  30. McKay, M., M. Davis, and P. Fanning. 1995. Messages: Communication skills book, 2nd ed, 34–36. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.Google Scholar
  31. McKenzie, C., and K. James. 2004. Aesthetics as an aid to understanding complex systems and decision judgement in operating complex systems. E:CO, Special Double Issue 6 (1–2): 32–39.Google Scholar
  32. Mehrabian, A. 1972. Nonverbal communication. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Morley, D. 1980. The nationwide audience: Structure and decoding. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
  34. Otheguy, R., O. García, and W. Reid. (2015). Clarifying translanguaging and deconstructing named languages: A perspective from linguistics. Applied Linguistics Review, 6(3).Google Scholar
  35. Oxford Dictionaries | English. 2019. Expression | Definition of expression in English by Oxford Dictionaries. [Online] Available at https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/expression. Accessed 26 March 2019.
  36. Pennycook, A. 2006. Postmodernism in language policy. In An introduction to language policy: Theory and method, ed. T. Ricento, 60–67. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  37. Radway, J. 1984. Reading the romance. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  38. Savage-Rumbaugh, S., and E. Bates. 1993. Language comprehension in ape and child. Chicago: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schenker, M. 2016. The surprising history of emojis | Webdesigner Depot. [Online] Webdesigner Depot. Available at https://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2016/10/the-surprising-history-of-emojis/. Accessed 26 March 2019.
  40. Schoenemann, P. 1999. Minds and Machines 9 (3): 309–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schoenemann, P. 2017. A complex-adaptive-systems approach to the evolution of language and the Brain. In Complexity in language, 67–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Schwartzhaupt, B. 2013. Conceiving language as a complex adaptive system: A problem for SLA researchers? Signo 38: 261–272.Google Scholar
  43. Simpson, J. 2017. Translanguaging in the contact zone: Language use in superdiverse urban areas. In Multilingualisms and development: Selected proceedings of the 11th language and development conference, ed. H. Colman, 207–223, November 18–20, British Council India, New Delhi, India 2015.Google Scholar
  44. Smith, C. 2019. Fun stats: 28 interesting emoji statistics. [Online] DMR. Available at https://expandedramblings.com/index.php/interesting-emoji-statistics/. Accessed 26 March 2019.
  45. Sommerer, C., and L. Mignonneau. 2003. Modeling complexity for interactive art works on the internet. In Art and complexity, ed. J. Casti and A. Karlqvist, 85–107. New York: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sooriya, P. 2017. Non verbal communication. Solapur: Laxmi Book Publication.Google Scholar
  47. Stecker, R. 1997. Artworks. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Strongman, L. 2017. Language evolution, acquisition, adaptation and change. In Sociolinguistics: Interdisciplinary perspectives, ed. Xiaoming Jiang, 17–32. IntechOpen.  https://doi.org/10.5772/67767.Google Scholar
  49. The Guardian. 2019. Visible darkness: The shadowed streets of Chicago-in pictures. [Online] Available at https://www.theguardian.com/cities/gallery/2018/may/14/clarissa-bonet-visible-darkness-shadowed-streets-chicago-in-pictures-clarissa-bonet. Accessed 26 March 2019.
  50. Watzlawick, P. 1966. A structured family interview. Family Process 5: 256–271.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1966.00256.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Watzlawick, P., J.H. Beavin, and D.D. Jackson. 1967. Pragmatics of human communication. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  52. Wei, L. 2017. Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics 39 (2): 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. YourDictionary. 2019. Old English words and modern meanings. [Online] Available at https://reference.yourdictionary.com/dictionaries/old-english-words-and-modern-meanings.html. Accessed 26 March 2019.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Language and Global StudiesUniversity of Central LancashirePrestonUK

Personalised recommendations