Advertisement

Complex and Supercomplex Adaptive Systems

  • Victoria OrangeEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter starts by looking at complex systems theory and, more importantly, complex adaptive systems theory; these systems are defined, their features are outlined and the items that make up the systems are described. Important phenomena such as boundaries and balance are addressed. It is also shown how complex systems theory fits in with other systems theories. An important point in this chapter is the introduction of supercomplex systems and, more precisely, supercomplex adaptive systems and the characteristics of them. It is important to understand these systems and how they work as they are developed in detail in the subsequent chapters. This chapter ends with a section outlining how the term supercomplexity has been used in other work and how it is used in this book.

Keywords

Complex systems theory Complex adaptive systems theory Boundaries Balance Supercomplex systems Supercomplex adaptive systems Supercomplexity 

References

  1. Arnold, R., and J. Wade. 2015. A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach. Procedia Computer Science 44: 669–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baicchi, A. 2015. Construction learning as a complex adaptive system. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baianu, I., and R. Poli. 2011. From simple to complex and ultra-complex systems: A paradigm shift towards non-abelian systems dynamics. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana, Trento University and Mitteleuropa Foundation.Google Scholar
  4. Barnett, R. 2014. The university in an age of supercomplexity: Challenges and possibilities. London: Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  5. Cabej, N. 2015. Building the most complex structure on Earth: An epigenetic narrative of development and evolution of animals. Academic Press and Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands and Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  6. Chan, S. 2001. Complex adaptive systems. ESD.83 Research Seminar in Engineering Systems.Google Scholar
  7. Cilliers, P. 2016. Boundaries, hierarchies and networks in complex systems. In Critical Complexity, ed. PaulHG Cilliers, 85–96. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  8. Cilliers, P. 2001. Boundaries, hierarchies and networks in complex systems. International Journal of Innovation Management 5 (2): 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crowcroft, J. 2019. Introduction to network theory. [Online] Available at https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/teaching/1011/PrincComm/slides/graph_theory_1-11.pdf. Accessed 22 March 2019.
  10. Colchester, J. 2016. Innovation home—Systems innovation. Systems Innovation. [Online] Available at https://complexitylabs.io/complex-system/?print-posts=word. Accessed 22 March 2019.
  11. Cottingham, J., R. Stoothoff, and D. Murdoch. 1985. The philosophical writings of descartes. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Davis, B., D. Sumara, and R. Luce-Kapler. 2008. Engaging minds. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Dodder, R., and R. Dare. 2000. Complex adaptive systems and complexity theory: Inter-related knowledge domains. Cambridge: Complex Adaptive Systems and Complexity Theory: Inter-related Knowledge Domains by Rebecca Dodder and Robert DareESD.83: Research Seminar in Engineering Systems Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  14. Ducard, G. 2017. Modeling and analysis of dynamic systems. Zürich: Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control.Google Scholar
  15. Farnam Street. 2019. An introduction to complex adaptive systems. [Online] Available at https://fs.blog/2014/04/mental-model-complex-adaptive-systems/. Accessed 22 March 2019.
  16. Fausto-Sterling, Anne. 2016. On the critiques of the concept of sex: An interview with Anne Fausto-Sterling. differences 27 (1): 189–205.Google Scholar
  17. Fivaz, R. 1994. The nature of order in complex systems. Systems Research 11: 43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Green, D. 2016. How change happens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hayes, F. 2018. Shaked, H., and Schechter, C. (2017). Systems thinking for school leaders: Holistic leadership for excellence in education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Leadership and Policy in Schools 17 (4): 647–649.Google Scholar
  20. Hayward, L., S. Higgins, K. Livingston, and D. Wyse. 2017. Living with supercomplexity. The Curriculum Journal 28 (2): 155–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holmes, P. 2008. History of mathematics—A short history of dynamical systems theory: 1885–2007. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  22. Hoogduin, Lex. 2016. Complexity, uncertainty and economic policy. Paper prepared for the OECD-EC-INET Oxford Workshop on Complexity and Policy, 29–30 September, OECD HQ, Paris.Google Scholar
  23. Kramsch, C. 2012. Why is everyone so excited about complexity theory in applied linguistics? Mélanges CRAPEL 33 (Special Edition): 10–24.Google Scholar
  24. Lambert, David. 1999. Geography and moral education in a super complex world: The significance of values education and some remaining dilemmas. Philosophy & Geography 2 (1): 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668799908573652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Larsen-Freeman, D. 2013. Complexity theory: A new way to think. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 13 (2): 369–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lin, Y., X. Duan, C. Zhao, and L. Xu. 2013. Systems science: Methodological approaches (Advances in Systems Science and Engineering (ASSE)), 1st ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  27. Louie, A. 2010. Robert Rosen’s anticipatory systems. Foresight 12 (3): 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mazzola, T., and D. Nelson. 2014. Systems theory. [Online] Available at https://www.slideserve.com/ray-dorsey/csc551-systems-theory-living-systemstheory.
  29. Meadows, D.H. 2008. Thinking in systems: A primer. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. Mitchell, S. 2003. Biological complexity and integrative pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moreno, Y. 2014. Complex systems and networks. [Online] Available at https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/ern/docs/ev_20140623_co03_en.pdf.
  32. New England Complex Systems Institute. 2019. Concepts: Adaptive—New England complex systems institute. [Online] Available at http://www.necsi.edu/guide/concepts/adaptive.html. Accessed 22 March 2019.
  33. Osberg, D., G. Biesta, and P. Cilliers. 2008. From representation to emergence: Complexity’s challenge to the epistemology of schooling. Educational Philosophy and Theory 40 (1): 213–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Perone, S., and Simmering, V. 2017. Applications of dynamic systems theory to cognition and development. Advances in Child Development and Behavior 52: 43–80.Google Scholar
  35. Pinazo-Calatayud, D. 2006. An approach to the study of emotions As complex dynamical systems. Electronic Magazine of Motivation and Emotion 9 (22): 1–25. Google Scholar
  36. Rickles, D., P. Hawe, and A. Shiell. 2007. A simple guide to chaos and complexity. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 61 (11): 933–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rosen, R. 1985. Anticipatory systems. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  38. Sevaldson, B. 2011. Giga-mapping: Visualisation for complexity and systems thinking in design. Oslo: Oslo School of Architecture and Design, Ocean Design Research Association.Google Scholar
  39. Smith, L., and E. Thelen. 2003. Development as a dynamic system. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (8): 343–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Spirkin, A. 1983. Dialectical materialism. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
  41. Stave, K.A., Hopper, M. 2008. Assessing the effectiveness of systems thinking interventions in the classroom. 26th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society.Google Scholar
  42. Times Higher Education (THE). 2019. New life amid chaos. [Online] Available at https://www.timeshighereducation.com/books/new-life-amid-chaos/156411.article. Accessed 22 March 2019.
  43. Tyers, D. 2015. Using dynamic systems theory as a conceptual framework to understand the interaction of culture and language in language education. 15th IALIC Conference Intercultural Communication in Social Practice.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Language and Global StudiesUniversity of Central LancashirePrestonUK

Personalised recommendations