• V. J. McClendon
  • David R. SquiresEmail author
Part of the Educational Media and Technology Yearbook book series (EMTY, volume 42)


Part Two focuses on Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) research and educational use cases providing evidence that the affordances of AR, VR, and mixed reality, defined as an immersive multiplatform experience reality (XR), have begun to make indelible changes in teaching and learning in the United States. XR’s recent developments stimulated the editors to propose a special edition to mark the interoperability of immersive technology to push the boundaries of human curiosity, creativity, and problem solving. After years of incremental development, XR has reached a critical level of investment, infrastructure, and emerging production. The chapters included in Part Two illustrate how XR can push user inquiry, engagement, learning, and interactivity to new levels within physical and digital contexts. We believe that XR may soon prove to be more valuable as a series of interconnected learning modes which move back and forth along a continuum, evolving from Milgrim’s three-dimensional taxonomic frame and extending to newer more global ways of blended human-technology-environmental interactivity (Milgram, Takemura, Utsumi, & Kishino, 1994). This emerging continuum and collaborative evolution suggests that a broader “multimediated reality is multiscale, multimodal, multisensory, multiveillant, and multidimensional” (Mann, Furness, Yuan, Iorio, & Wang, 2018, p. 13).


  1. Birt, J., Moore, E., & Cowling, M. (2017). Improving paramedic distance education through mobile mixed reality simulation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(6). Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education.Google Scholar
  2. Blum, A. (2018, March 19). ARCore vs. ARKit: Which is better for building Augmented Reality apps? Retrieved from
  3. Donachie, P. (2017, October 6). Can VR be a tool for inspiring empathy in higher ed? Education Dive. Retrieved from
  4. Driver, M., Zimmer, K., & Murphy, K. (2018). Using mixed reality simulations to prepare preservice special educators for collaboration in inclusive settings. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 26(1), 57–77. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education.Google Scholar
  5. Foundry10. (2017). Applied VR in the schools, 2016–2017, elementary findings: Interest in virtual reality. Retrieved from
  6. Hof, R. (2015, November 15). Brands look far and wide for a niche in Virtual Reality. Retrieved from
  7. Horwitz, J. (2018, May 1). Oculus Go VR headset hits shelves ahead of F8 launch and developer giveaway (Updated). Retrieved from
  8. IEEE. (2017). Retrieved from Scholar
  9. Kang, I. (2017, November 21). Oculus whiffed: Virtual reality was supposed to help us understand each other unlike any other medium. That’s a delusion. Slate. Retrieved from
  10. Kosowatz, J. (2017, May 1). Mixed reality replaces cadavers as teaching tool. Retrieved from
  11. Mann, S., Furness, T., Yuan, Y., Iorio, J., & Wang, Z. (2018). All reality: Virtual, augmented, mixed (X), mediated (X, Y), and multimediated reality. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.08386.Google Scholar
  12. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., & Kishino, F. (1994). Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, SPIE, 2351, 282–292.Google Scholar
  14. Milk, C. (2015, March). Chris Milk: How virtual reality can create the ultimate empathy machine [Video file]. Retrieved from
  15. Murphy, K. & Kellinger, J. (2017). At first I was really nervous: Integrating mixed reality simulations into urban preservice teacher coursework. In P. Resta & S. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1722–1726). Austin, TX: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
  16. Myers, R. (2017). Virtual Reality and depth of empathy. In J. Dron & S. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 723–728). Vancouver, BC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved September 4, 2018 from
  17. OpenXR. (2016, December 6). Retrieved from
  18. Virtual Reality Reporter. (2016, March 9). SuperData expands research scope of $40 billion virtual reality market. Retrieved from
  19. Robinson, A. (2017, May 3). VR was sold as an ‘empathy machine’ – but some artists are getting sick of it. The verge. Retrieved from
  20. SXSW. (2018, August 30). SXSW PanelPicker®. Retrieved from
  21. Wolcott, B. (2018, July 31). XR lab and virtual world technologies. Retrieved from
  22. Workman, S. (2018, July 30). Mixed reality: A revolutionary breakthrough in teaching and learning. Retrieved from
  23. Yang, R. (2017, April 5). “If you walk in someone else’s shoes, then you’ve taken their shoes”: Empathy machines as appropriation machines [Blog post]. Retrieved from
  24. Yuan, Y. (2017, May 31). IEEE P2048 standards paving the road for virtual reality and augmented reality. IEEE Standards University. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Library and eLearning, Bellevue CollegeBellevueUSA
  2. 2.Instructional Design and Educational Technology Program, Texas A&M University-Corpus ChristiCorpus ChristiUSA

Personalised recommendations