Advertisement

The Post-professional Transition

  • Edgar A BurnsEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The post-professional transition stretching from the 1970s to today recognises functionalist theories of professions as intellectually bankrupt. Sociologists and others introduced alternative concepts critiquing beliefs that the functions of profession determine how professions work, should be respected or remunerated. Scholars, however, view post-professionalism in very different ways and changes happening to professions are described here under six headings that break intellectually from functional theory despite functionalism’s persistence: as a stage in occupational development, embodying new professional identities, imagining a new kind of society, forming a new middle class, as occupational deprofessionalisation, or present-day work dilemmas. Initial reactions labelled post-professionalism the ‘power approach’ since it named professional power and influence, but the post-professional transition is much richer, covering multiple, complex, discursive and structural changes impacting professional work.

References

  1. Abbott, A. D. (1988). The system of professions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Abel, R. L. (1979). The rise of professionalism. British Journal of Law & Society, 6, 82–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, P. (1972). More is different. Science, 177(4047), 393–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Appiah, K. A. (1991). Is the post- in post-modernism the post- in post-colonialism? Critical Inquiry, 17(2), 336–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashcroft, K., Davies, J., & Riddell, R. (1997). Changing orthodoxies in teacher education and the making of professional partnerships. The Redland Papers, 5, 46–51.Google Scholar
  6. Baldwin, J. (2014). James Baldwin’s National Press Club speech 1986. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTjY4rZFY5c.
  7. Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ball, S. J. (2004). Education for sale! The commodification of everything? King’s Annual Education Lecture 2004. London: University of London. http://www.asu.edu/educ/epsl/CERU/Articles/CERU-0410-253-OWI.pdf.
  9. Ball, S. J. (2005). The commodification of education in England: Towards a new form of social relations (pp. 1–30). Kyoto: Japan-UK Education Forum. http://wwwsoc.nii.ac.jp/juef/ac/2005/kyoto05.pdf.
  10. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Berg, I., & Govel, S. (1973). Education and jobs: The great training robbery. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
  12. Bricheno, P., & Thornton, M. (2016). Crying in cupboards: What happens when teachers are bullied. Kibworth Beauchamp, UK: Troubador.Google Scholar
  13. Burns, E. A. (2007). Positioning a post-professional approach to studying professions. New Zealand Sociology, 22(1), 69–98.Google Scholar
  14. Burrage, M. C., & Torstendahl, R. (Eds.). (1990). Professions in theory and history. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Carnegie, G., & Edwards, R. (2001). The construction of the professional accountant: The case of the Incorporated Institute of Accountants, Victoria (1886). Accounting, Organizations & Society, 26(4–5), 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Casey, C. (1995). Work, self and society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Collins, R. (1979). The credential society. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Cronin, B., & Davenport, E. (1988). Post-professionalism: Transforming the information heartland. London: Taylor Graham.Google Scholar
  19. Derber, C., Schwartz, W. A., & Magrass, Y. R. (1990). Power in the highest degree: Professionals and the rise of a new mandarin order. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Duyvendak, J. W., Knijn, T., & Kremer, M. (2007). Policy, people, and the new professional: De-professionalization and re-professionalization in care and welfare. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Empson, L. (2006). Profession. Oxford, UK. http://www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/ccc/Profession.htm.
  22. Evetts, J. (2014). Professionalism: Theoretical changes and challenges. Travail Emploi Formation, 11, 90–110.Google Scholar
  23. Fielding, S. L. (2016). Empowerment evaluation, postprofessionalization, and oligarchy: A retrospective. Journal of Applied Social Science, 10(1), 44–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fournier, V. (1999). The appeal to ‘professionalism’ as a disciplinary mechanism. The Sociological Review, 47(2), 280–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fournier, V. (2000). Boundary work and the (un)making of the professions. In N. Malin (Ed.), Professionalism, boundaries and the workplace (pp. 67–86). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Freidson, E. (1970a). Professional dominance. New York: Atherton.Google Scholar
  27. Freidson, E. (1970b). Profession of medicine. New York: Dodd, Mead.Google Scholar
  28. Freidson, E. (1994). Professionalism reborn: Theory, prophecy, and policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  29. Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  30. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. New York: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  31. Goodson, I. F., & Hargreaves, A. (Eds.). (1996). Teachers’ professional lives. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  32. Grey, C. (1994). Career as a project of the self and labour process discipline. Sociology, 28(2), 479–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Haapakorpi, A. (2012). Work organization and professionalization in new media industry: The case of a Finnish company. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 2(1), 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Halffman, W., & Hoppe, R. (2004). Scientific expertise and political decision making (pp. 1–14). http://bbt-webserver.bbt.utwente.nl/rethinking/Downloads/HH_Sci_Pol_Bounds.pdf.
  35. Halliday, T. C. (1987). Beyond monopoly: Lawyers, state crises, and professional empowerment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Halmos, P. (Ed.). (1973). Professionalisation and social change. Keele, UK: University of Keele.Google Scholar
  37. Halsey, A. H. (1992). Decline of donnish dominion. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Hargreaves, A. (1996). Teachers’ professional lives: Aspirations and actualities. In I. Goodson & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teachers’ professional lives (pp. 1–27). London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  39. Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers & Teaching, 6(2), 151–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Holroyd, C. (2000). Are assessors professional? Student assessment and the professionalism of academics. Active Learning in Higher Education, 1(1), 28–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. House, R. (2003). Therapy and modernity: Deconstructing and transcending profession-centred therapy. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  42. Hugman, R. (1991). Power in caring professions. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Illich, I. (1977). Disabling professions. In I. Illich, et al. (Eds.), Disabling professions (pp. 11–40). New York: Marion Boyars.Google Scholar
  44. Johnson, T. J. (1972). Professions and power. London: Macmillan. Republished Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
  45. Johnson, T. J. (1973). Imperialism and the professions: Notes on the development of professional occupations in Britain’s colonies and the new states. In P. Halmos (Ed.), Professionalisation and social change (pp. 281–309). Keele, UK: Keele University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Kay, F. M. (2004). Professionalism and exclusionary practices: Shifting the terrain of privilege and professional monopoly. International Journal of the Legal Profession, 11(1–2), 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Khoury, R. M. (1980). The sociology of the professions: Are we headed down a dead-end street? Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 8(1), 31–36.Google Scholar
  48. Krause, E. A. (1996). Death of the guilds: Professions, states, and the advancement of capitalism, 1930 to the present. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Kritzer, H. M. (1999). The professions are dead, long live the professions: Legal practice in a post-professional world. Law & Society Review, 33(3), 713–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kuhlmann, E. (2003). Gender differences, gender hierarchies and professions: An embedded approach to the German dental profession. The International Journal of Sociology & Social Policy, 23(4–5), 80–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Larson, M. S. (1977). The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  52. Lather, P. (2004). This is your father’s paradigm: Government intrusion and the case of qualitative research in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1), 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Liyanagunawardena, T., Adams, A., & Williams, S. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008–2012. The International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lounsbury, M., & Leblebici, H. (2004). The origins of strategic practice: Product diversification in the American mutual fund industry. Strategic Organization, 2(1), 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mac an Ghaill, M., Hanafin, J., &. Conway, P. F. (2004). Gender politics and exploring masculinities in Irish education (Report 3). Dublin, Ireland: National Council for Curricula and Assessment.Google Scholar
  56. Macdonald, K. M. (1995). The sociology of the professions. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  57. Macdonald, K. M., Ritzer, G., & Hall, R. R. (1988). The sociology of the professions. Dead or alive? Work & Occupations, 15(3), 251–273.Google Scholar
  58. Martin, B. (1998a). Knowledge, identity and the middle-class: From collective to individualised class formation? The Sociological Review, 46(4), 653–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Martin, B. (1998b). Transforming the contemporary ‘new middle class’: From professionals and managers to ‘bricoleurs’? (pp. 1–28). http://hi.rutgers.edu/szelenyi60/martin.html.
  60. May, C. (2007). The clinical encounter and the problem of context. Sociology, 41(1), 29–45.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507072282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Milles, J. (2004). Leaky boundaries and the decline of the autonomous law school library. Law Library Journal, 96(3), 387–423.Google Scholar
  62. Mohanty, C. T. (1991). Cartographies of struggle: Third world women and the politics of feminism. In C. T. Mohanty, A. Russo, & L. Torres (Eds.), Third world women and the politics of feminism (pp. 1–47). Bloomingham: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Moorhead, R., Sherr, A., & Paterson, A. (2003). Contesting professionalism: Legal aid and nonlawyers in England and Wales. Law & Society Review, 37(4), 765–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Morrell, K. (2004). Analysing professional work in the public sector: The case of NHS nurses (pp. 1–29). Leicestershire, UK: Loughborough University. https://Dspace.Lboro.Ac.Uk/Dspace-Jspui/Bitstream/2134/2078/1/2004-1.Pdf.
  65. Nichols, T. (2017). The death of expertise: The campaign against established knowledge and why it matters. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Oney, S. (1984). Target marketing: Going after the ‘Muppie’ market. Madison Avenue, 26, 78–81.Google Scholar
  67. O’Regan, D. (2001). Genesis of a profession: Towards professional status for internal auditing. Managerial Auditing Journal, 16(4), 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pahl, R. (1991). Review—C. Derber, W. Schwartz, & Y. Magrass, Power in the highest degree: Professionals and the rise of the mandarin order. Work, Employment and Society, 5(4), 664–665.Google Scholar
  69. Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Randall, G., & Kindiak, D. (2008). Deprofessionalization or post-professionalization? Reflections on the state of social work as a profession. Social Work in Health Care, 47(4), 341–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ravn, A. (1999, November). Shifts in the nature of home-school research (pp. 1–18). Paper presented to ERNAPE roundtable conference: Education is partnership, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  72. Reid, H. G. (2001). Democratic theory and the public sphere project: Rethinking knowledge, authority, and identity. New Political Science, 23, 517–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rubin, H. (2004). The compromised commons: Encroaching market forces and the effects of good work. In J. Solomon (Ed.), GoodWork® project report series (pp. 1–35). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  74. Schauble, G. (1996). The change of daily activities during the period of transition to retirement for singles and couples. Zeitscrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie, 29(5), 351–361.Google Scholar
  75. Seddon, J. (2005). Freedom from command and control (2nd ed.). New York: Productivity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Seelig, P. (1986). Muppie market. Incentive Marketing, 160(3), 34–35.Google Scholar
  77. Steckel, C. (1981). The ministry as a profession and calling. Word & World, 1(4), 373–381.Google Scholar
  78. Stevens, R. (2001). Public roles for the medical profession in the United States: Beyond theories of decline and fall. Milbank Quarterly, 79(3), 327–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Stronach, I., Corbin, B., McNamara, O., & Warne, T. (2000). Towards an uncertain politics of professionalism: Teacher and nurse identities in flux. Manchester, UK: Manchester Metropolitan University. http://Www.Esri.Mmu.Ac.Uk/Respapers/.
  80. Susskind, R., & Susskind, D. (2015a). The future of professions: How technology will transform the work of human experts. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Susskind, R., & Susskind, D. (2015b, October). The future of professions. YouTube Google Talk. London. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulXwTpW2oFI.
  82. Svensson, L. G. (2003a). Market, management and professionalism: Professional work and changing organisational contexts. In H. Mieg & M. Pfadenhauer (Eds.), Professionelles leistung—Professional performance. Konstanz, Germany: UVK.Google Scholar
  83. Svensson, L. G. (2003b). The quest for professionalism and the dialectic of individualism and collectivism in work organisations. Knowledge, Work & Society, 1(1), 107–129.Google Scholar
  84. Svensson, L. G. (2006). New professionalism, trust and competence: Some conceptual remarks and empirical data. Current Sociology, 54(4), 579–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sweet, A. (2012). Neofunctionalism and supranational governance (pp. 1–39). Law Faculty Scholarship Series, Paper 4628. New Haven, CT: Yale University. http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers.
  86. Tight, M. (2009). The development of higher education in the United Kingdom since 1945. Maidenhead, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Toren, N. (1972). Social work: The case of a semi-profession. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  88. Torstendahl, R. (1990). Essential properties, strategic aims and historical development: Three approaches to theories of professionalism. In M. C. Burrage & R. Torstendahl (Eds.), Professions in theory and history. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  89. Torstendahl, R., & Burrage, M. C. (Eds.). (1990). The formation of professions: Knowledge, state and strategy. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  90. Touraine, A. (1995). Critique of modernity. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  91. Trosow, S. (2004–2005). The database and the fields of law: Are there new divisions of labor? Law Library Journal, 96(1), 63–93.Google Scholar
  92. Veelken, L. (1988). Study for senior citizens: A model of post-professional scientific further education for elderly people. Zeitscrift Fur Gerontologie, 21(4), 198–205.Google Scholar
  93. Witz, A. (1992). Professions and patriarchy. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Waikato UniversityNapierNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations