Advertisement

Periodising Professions History

  • Edgar A BurnsEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Claims by and about professions are challenged by a simple chunking method. This obliges conventional professionalisation histories to incorporate alternative evidence. Western modern professions have been around for 200 years and are viewed by many as obvious parts of society. Modern professions are quite new and have spent a lot of time and energy contesting occupational territory in labour markets; they are not simply about knowledge, progress and care in modern society. Contemplating four artificial fifty-year blocks to recount changes and developments to professions usefully disrupts naturalised histories. Earlier professions changed under socioeconomic pressures, and this continues today. Better explanations of how professions developed to the present are necessary preparation for big changes coming with the rebalancing of geopolitical power and the oncoming digital era.

References

  1. Abbott, A. D. (1988). The system of professions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin, R. (2016). The great convergence: Information technology and the new globalization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barnard, A. (2004). History and theory in anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barton, R. (2003). ‘Men of science’: Language, identity and professionalization in the mid-Victorian scientific community. History of Science, 41(1), 73–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, H. S., Greer, B., Hughes, E., & Strauss, A. (1961). Boys in white: Student culture in medical school (3rd print, 1984 ed.). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  6. Berlant, J. L. (1975). Profession and monopoly: A study of medicine in the United States and Great Britain. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York: Greenwood. https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/fr/bourdieu-forms-capital.htm.
  8. Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Brock, D. M., Leblebici, H., & Muzio, D. (2014). Understanding professionals and their workplaces: The mission of the Journal of Professions and Organization. Journal of Professions & Organization, 1(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown, K., & Gilfoyle, D. (Eds.). (2010). Healing the herds: Disease, livestock economies, and the globalization of veterinary medicine. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Bud, R. (2007). Penicillin: Triumph and tragedy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Burns, E. A. (2007). Positioning a post-professional approach to studying professions. New Zealand Sociology, 22(1), 69–98.Google Scholar
  17. Burns, E. A. (2009). ‘Urged for more than fifty years’: Veterinary education in New Zealand, c1900–1964. History of Education Review, 38(1), 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Burns, E. A. (2015). Reading theory or reading historical evidence: The case of Anglo-settler veterinary professionalization. InterDisciplines: Journal of History & Sociology, 6(1), 121–149.Google Scholar
  19. Burrage, M. C., & Torstendahl, R. (Eds.). (1990). Professions in theory and history. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Carr-Saunders, A. M., & Wilson, P. A. (1964 [1933]). The professions. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  21. Corfield, P. J. (1995). Power and the professions in early industrial Britain. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavior Brain Science, 24(1), 87–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cowan, N. (2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Davies, C. (1980). Rewriting nursing history. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  25. Davies, C. (2007). Rewriting nursing history—Again? Nursing History Review, 15, 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dent, M. (1993). Professionalism, educated labour and the state: Hospital medicine and the new managerialism. Sociological Review, 41(2), 244–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Derber, C., Schwartz, W. A., & Magrass, Y. R. (1990). Power in the highest degree: Professionals and the rise of a new mandarin order. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. de Tocqueville, A. (2017 [1835]). Democracy in America. London: Forgotten Books.Google Scholar
  29. Dingwall, R. W. J., & Fenn, P. (1987). ‘A respectable profession?’ Sociological and economic perspectives on the regulation of professional services. International Journal of Law & Economics, 7(1), 51–64.Google Scholar
  30. Eggar, V. (1986). Fabian in Egypt: Salamah Musa and the rise of the professional classes, 1909–1939. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  31. Flexner, A. (1910). The Flexner report: Medical education in the United States and Canada (Bulletin No. 4). New York: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. http://archive.carnegiefoundation.org/pdfs/elibrary/Carnegie_Flexner_Report.pdf.
  32. Flexner, A. (1915). Is social work a profession? School & Society, 1(26), 90–111.Google Scholar
  33. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  34. Foucault, M. (1973). Birth of the clinic. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  35. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  36. Foucault, M. (2000 [1994]). For an ethic of discomfort. In J. D. Fabion (Ed.), Essential works of Foucault, 1954–1984 (pp. 443–448). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  37. Fournier, V. (1999). The appeal to ‘professionalism’ as a disciplinary mechanism. The Sociological Review, 47(2), 280–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fournier, V. (2000). Boundary work and the (un)making of the professions. In N. Malin (Ed.), Professionalism, boundaries and the workplace (pp. 67–86). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Freidson, E. (1970a). Professional dominance. New York: Atherton.Google Scholar
  40. Freidson, E. (1970b). Profession of medicine. New York: Dodd, Mead.Google Scholar
  41. Friedman, S. (2015). The limits of capital gains: Using Bourdieu to understand social mobility into elite occupations. In J. Thatcher, N. Ingram, C. Burke, & J. Abrahams (Eds.), Bourdieu: The next generation (pp. 107–123). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Go, J. (2003). Waves of American empire, 1787–2003: US empire and imperialistic activity from the shores of Tripoli to Iraq. International Sociology, 22(1), 5–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Go, J. (2009). The ‘new’ sociology of empire and colonialism. Sociology Compass, 3(5), 775–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Go, J. (2013a). For a postcolonial sociology. Theory & Society, 42(1), 25–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Go, J. (2013b). Sociology’s imperial unconscious: The emergence of American sociology in the context of empire. In G. Steinmetz (Ed.), Sociology and empire (pp. 82–105). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Goode, W. J. (1957). Community within a community: The professions. American Sociological Review, 22(2), 194–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Goode, W. J. (1969). The theoretical limits of professionalization. In A. Etzioni (Ed.), The semi professions and their organization: Teachers, nurses, and social workers (pp. 266–313). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  48. Green, J. (2005). Professions and community. New Zealand Sociology, 20, 122–141.Google Scholar
  49. Green, W. A. (1995). Periodizing world history. History & Theory, 34(2), 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Grey, C. (1994). Career as a project of the self and labour process discipline. Sociology, 28(2), 479–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Harford, T. (2007). The undercover economist. New York: Random.Google Scholar
  52. Harrington, B. (2015). Going global: Professionals and the micro-foundations of institutional change. Journal of Professions & Organization, 2(2), 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Haug, M. R. (1975). The deprofessionalization of everyone? Sociological Forces, 8(3), 197–213.Google Scholar
  54. Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2006). Understanding the historical turn in the policy sciences: A critique of stochastic, narrative, path dependency and process-sequencing models of policy-making over time. Policy Sciences, 39(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Illich, I. (1975). Medical nemesis. London: Marion Boyars.Google Scholar
  56. Illich, I. (1977). Disabling professions. In I. Illich, et al. (Eds.), Disabling professions (pp. 11–40). New York: Marion Boyars.Google Scholar
  57. James, D. (2015). How Bourdieu bites back: Recognising misrecognition in education and educational research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 45(1), 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Jenkins, L. A. (2016). ‘For love or for money’: A history of amateurism in the Olympic Games. Fightland Blog. http://fightland.vice.com/blog/for–love–or–for–money–a–history–of–amateurism–in–the–olympic–games.
  59. Johnson, T. J. (1972). Professions and power. London: Macmillan. Republished Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
  60. Johnson, T. J. (1973). Imperialism and the professions: Notes on the development of professional occupations in Britain’s colonies and the new states. In P. Halmos (Ed.), Professionalisation and social change (pp. 281–309). Keele, UK: Keele University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Johnson, T. J. (1995). Governmentality and the institutionalization of expertise. In T. J. Johnson, G. Larkin, & M. Saks (Eds.), Health professions and the state in Europe (pp. 7–24). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Jones, S. D. (2003). Valuing animals. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Kimball, B. A. (1995). The ‘true professional ideal’ in America. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  64. Krause, E. A. (1996). Death of the guilds: Professions, states, and the advancement of capitalism, 1930 to the present. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Langerock, H. (1915). Professionalism: A study in professional deformation. American Journal of Sociology, 21(1), 30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Larson, M. S. (1977). The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  67. Larson, M. S. (1990). On the matter of experts and professionals, or how impossible is it to leave nothing unsaid. In R. Torstendahl & M. C. Burrage (Eds.), The formation of professions (pp. 11–23). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  68. Linklater, A. (2002). Measuring America. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  69. Lorey, D. E. (1992). The rise of the professions in twentieth-century Mexico: university graduates and occupational changes since 1929. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Latin American Publications Center.Google Scholar
  70. Macdonald, K. M. (1995). The sociology of the professions. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  71. Malatesta, M. (Ed.). (2002). Society and the professions in Italy, 1860–1914. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Marshall, T. (1939). The recent history of professionalisation in relation to social structure and social policy. Canadian Journal of Economics & Political Sciences, 5, 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Martineau, H. (2016 [1837]). Society in America (Vol. 1). London: Forgotten Books.Google Scholar
  74. May, C. (2007). The clinical encounter and the problem of context. Sociology, 41(1), 29–45.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507072282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Mcdonald, T. J. (Ed.). (1996). The historic turn in the human sciences. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  76. McDonald, L. (2001). Florence Nightingale and the early origins of evidence-based nursing. Evidence Based Nursing, 4(3), 68–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Miller, G. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Millerson, G. (1964a). Dilemmas of professionalism. New Society, 4, 15–18.Google Scholar
  79. Millerson, G. (1964b). The qualifying associations: A study in professionalisation. London: Routledge. Republished 2003.Google Scholar
  80. Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Mishra, A. (2012). China has become the preferred destination for medical education. University World News. http://Www.Universityworldnews.Com/Article.Php?Story=20120904100946519.
  82. Moen, P., & Roehling, P. (2005). The career mystique: Cracks in the American dream. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  83. Nichols, R. (2010). Postcolonial studies and the discourse of Foucault: Survey of a field of problematization. Foucault Studies, 9, 111–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. O’Neill, O. (2002). A question of trust. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Olmstead, A., & Rhode, P. (2004a). An impossible undertaking: The eradication of bovine tuberculosis in the United States. The Journal of Economic History, 64(3), 734–772.Google Scholar
  86. Olmstead, A., & Rhode, P. (2004b). The ‘Tuberculous cattle trust’: Disease contagion in an era of regulatory uncertainty. The Journal of Economic History, 64(4), 929–963.Google Scholar
  87. Olmstead, A., & Rhode, P. (2015). Arresting contagion: Science, policy, and conflicts over animal disease control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Otto, M. (2017). Teeth: The story of beauty, inequality, and the struggle for oral health in America. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  89. Papps, E., & Olssen, M. (1997). Doctoring childbirth and regulating midwifery in New Zealand: A Foucauldian perspective. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore.Google Scholar
  90. Parsons, T. (1951). Social structure and dynamic process: The case of modern medical practice. In T. Parsons (Ed.), The social system (pp. 428–479). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  91. Perkin, H. (1969). The origins of modern English society, 1771–1880. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  92. Perkin, H. (1981). Professionalism and property: English society since 1880. Reading, UK: University of Reading.Google Scholar
  93. Perkin, H. (1989). The rise of professional society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  94. Perkin, H. (1996). The third revolution: Professional elites in the modern world. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  95. Pratt, M. (1992). Imperial eyes. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Pugh, L. (1962). From farriery to veterinary medicine, 1785–1795. Cambridge, UK: Heffer & Sons.Google Scholar
  97. Radkau, J. (2009). Max Weber: A biography. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  98. Reader, W. J. (1966). Professional men: The rise of the professional classes in nineteenth-century England. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
  99. Reiger, K. (2008). Domination or mutual recognition? Professional subjectivity in midwifery and obstetrics. Social Theory & Health, 6(2), 132–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Robertson, R. (1992). Globalisation: Social theory and social culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  101. Saks, M. (2005). Professions and the public interest: Medical power, altruism and alternative medicine. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Shaw, G. B. (1911). The doctor’s dilemma. New York: Brentano. https://openlibrary.org/publishers/Brentano’s.
  103. Siegrist, H. (1990). Professionalisation as a process: Patterns, progression and discontinuity. In M. C. Burrage & R. Torstendahl (Eds.), Professions in theory and history: Rethinking the study of professions (pp. 177–202). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  104. Smith, A. (2018 [1778]). Wealth of nations (Vol. 8). http://www.adamsmith.org/quotes.
  105. Smithcors, J. F. (1958). Veterinary public health matters in colonial America. Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association, 132(5), 194–201.Google Scholar
  106. Spree, R. (1980). The impact of the professionalisation of physicians on social change in Germany during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 15, 24–39.Google Scholar
  107. Steinmetz, G. (2010). Ideas in exile: Refugees from Nazi Germany and the failure to transplant historical sociology into the United States. International Journal of Politics, Culture, & Society, 23(1), 1–27.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-009-9062-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Steinmetz, G. (2011). Bourdieu, historicity, and historical sociology. Cultural Sociology, 5(1), 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Steinmetz, G. (2013). Major contributions to sociological theory and research on empire 1830s–present. In G. Steinmetz (Ed.), Sociology and empire: The imperial entanglements of a discipline (pp. 1–50). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Susskind, R., & Susskind, D. (2015). The future of professions: How technology will transform the work of human experts. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  111. Torstendahl, R., & Burrage, M. C. (Eds.). (1990). The formation of professions: Knowledge, state and strategy. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  112. Vallis, R. (2011). A veterinary awakening: The history of government veterinarians in Australia. Canberra, ACT: Department of Agriculture, Fisheries & Forestry.Google Scholar
  113. Van Kreiken, R. (2003, September 23–26). Legal reasoning as a field of knowledge production: Luhman, Bourdieu and law’s autonomy. ESA Spanish Sociological Association. University of Murcia, Spain.Google Scholar
  114. Varul, M. (2010). Talcott Parsons, the sick role and chronic illness. Body and Society, 16(2), 72–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Vollmer, H. M., & Mills, D. L. (Eds.). (1966). Professionalization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  116. Wagner, P. (2001). Modernity: One or many? In J. Blau (Ed.), Blackwell companion to sociology (pp. 30–42). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  117. Wagner, P. (2010). Multiple trajectories of modernity: Why social theory needs historical sociology. Thesis Eleven, 100, 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Wilensky, H. L. (1964). The professionalization of everyone? American Journal of Sociology, 70(2), 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Wilentz, S. (2005). The rise of American democracy: Jefferson to Lincoln. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  120. Witz, A. (1992). Professions and patriarchy. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Waikato UniversityNapierNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations