Advertisement

Professionalisation Discourses

  • Edgar A BurnsEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The concept of professionalisation discourse generates understanding of how professions link the organisational information described in the previous chapter to naturalised narratives of modernisation, progress and science that Max Weber called formal rationalisation. Early professions claimed to be both good and expert and since then have successfully bundled these ideas together. The powerfully ‘built together’ quality of these discourses about professions continually resists challenge. For two centuries, this pairing has justified the value of professional work and legitimated demands for social status and earning. Even though previously effective, this bundling is not an adequate explanation of professions, professionals or professionalism. A better explanation is gained reviewing five temptations that shape descriptions of professions, revealing a more realistic and accurate picture of professionalisation and professions’ claims.

References

  1. Abbott, A. D. (1988). The system of professions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Abbott, A. D. (2001). Time matters: On theory and method. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Abbott, A. D., & Smith, D. R. (1983). A labor market perspective on the mobility of college football coaches. Social Forces, 61(4), 1147–1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Abbott, A. D., & Smith, D. R. (1984). Governmental constraints and labour market mobility. Journal of Work & Occupations, 11(1), 29–53.Google Scholar
  5. Adam, B. E. (2009). Cultural future matters: An exploration in the spirit of Max Weber’s methodological writings. Time & Society, 18(1), 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Adams, T. L. (1998). Gender and women’s employment in the male-dominated profession of dentistry: 1867–1917. The Canadian Review of Sociology & Anthropology, 35(1), 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Adams, T. L. (2011). Professions in civil society and the state: Invariant foundations and consequences. Contemporary Sociology, 40(6), 751–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ballard, J., Scales, K., & Edwards, M. A. (2006). Perceptions of information technology careers among women in career development transition. Information Technology, Learning, & Performance Journal, 24(2), 1–9.Google Scholar
  9. Barton, D., & Tusting, K. (2005). Beyond communities of practice: Language power and social context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bazerman, C., & Paradis, J. (Eds.). (1991). Textual dynamics of the professions. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  11. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Berlant, J. L. (1975). Profession and monopoly: A study of medicine in the United States and Great Britain. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bhabha, H. K. (1995). Location of culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Bierer, B. W. (1955). A short history of veterinary medicine in America. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Bourgeault, I. (2015). Magali Sarfatti Larson and Anne Witz: Professional projects, class and gender. In F. Collyer (Ed.), Palgrave handbook of social theory in health, illness and medicine (pp. 520–534). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brazelton, J. K. (1998). Implications for women in accounting: Some preliminary evidence regarding gender communication. Issues in Accounting Education, 13(3), 509–530.Google Scholar
  19. Brezina, T. (1996). Teaching inequality: A simple counterfactual exercise. Teaching Sociology, 24(2), 219–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bricker, R., & Previts, G. J. (1990). The sociology of accountancy: A study of academic and practice community schisms. Accounting Horizons, 4(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  21. Brint, S. (1994). In an age of experts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Brint, S. (2015). Professional responsibility in an age of experts and large organizations. In D. Mitchell & R. Ream (Eds.), Professional responsibility in a diverse society (pp. 9–107). Reform: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Brown, K., & Gilfoyle, D. (Eds.). (2010). Healing the herds: Disease, livestock economies, and the globalization of veterinary medicine. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Bulliet, W. (2016). The wheel: Inventions and reinventions. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Burns, E. A. (2015a). Reading theory or reading historical evidence: The case of Anglo-settler veterinary professionalization. InterDisciplines: Journal of History & Sociology, 6(1), 121–149.Google Scholar
  26. Burns, E. A. (2015b). Re-imagining career transition: Any help from typologies? Journal of Sociology, 51(4), 933–949.Google Scholar
  27. Burns, E. A. (2016). A sociological view of psychology and professional boundaries. Psychology Aotearoa, 8(1), 43–46.Google Scholar
  28. Burrage, M. C., & Torstendahl, R. (Eds.). (1990). Professions in theory and history. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Capaldi, N. (1998). The Enlightenment project. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cipolla, C. (1973). The professions: The long view. Journal of European Economic History, 2(1), 37–51.Google Scholar
  31. Cunningham, B. (Ed.). (2008). Exploring professionalism. London: Institute of Education, Bedford Way.Google Scholar
  32. Dang, R., & Vo, L.-C. (2014). The influence of top management team characteristics on the presence of women on corporate board. Revue Management & Avenir, 5(71), 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Davies, C. (2007). Rewriting nursing history—Again? Nursing History Review, 15, 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2007 [1987]). A thousand plateaus. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  35. Dent, M. (2002). Professional predicaments: Comparing the professionalization projects of German and Italian nurses. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15(2), 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: US art museums, 1920–1940. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 267–292). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. Downie, R. S. (1990). Professions and professionalism. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 24(2), 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ehrenberg, A. (2013). The notion of social pathology: A case study of Narcissus in American Society. In K. Keohane & A. Petersen (Eds.), The social pathologies of contemporary civilization (pp. 11–23). Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  39. Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  40. Epstein, C. (1998). The part-time paradox: Time norms, professional life, family and gender. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Esland, G. (1980). Professions and professionalism. In G. Esland & G. Salaman (Eds.), The politics of work and occupations (pp. 213–250). Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  42. Evetts, J. (1992). Dimensions of career: Avoiding reification in the analysis of change. Sociology, 26(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Evetts, J. (1999a). Professions: Changes and continuities. International Review of Sociology, 9(1), 7585.Google Scholar
  44. Evetts, J. (1999b). Professionalisation and professionalism: Issues for interprofessional care. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 13(2), 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Fawcett, B., & Hanlon, M. (2009). The ‘return to community’: Challenges to human services professionals. Journal of Sociology, 45(4), 433–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Fisher, J. R. (1994). The European enlightenment, political economy and the origins of the veterinary profession in Britain. Argos, 12, 45–51.Google Scholar
  47. Fitzpatrick, P. (1992). The mythology of modern law. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Fitzpatrick, P., & Hunt, A. (1987). Critical legal studies. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  49. Fletcher, J. (2001). Disappearing acts: Gender power, and relational practice at work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  50. Foucault, M. (1973). Birth of the clinic. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  51. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  52. Foucault, M. (1979). Governmentality. Ideology & Consciousness, 6, 521.Google Scholar
  53. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  54. Foucault, M. (1981). Orders of discourse. In R. Young (Ed.), Untying the text (pp. 48–78). Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  55. Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  56. Foucault, M. (2000 [1994]). For an ethic of discomfort. In J. D. Fabion (Ed.), Essential works of Foucault, 1954–1984 (pp. 443–448). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  57. Freidson, E. (1970). Professional dominance. New York: Atherton.Google Scholar
  58. Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  59. Gitlin, T. (2015). Why the ‘enlightenment project’ is necessary and unending. http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/189001/the-enlightenment-project.
  60. Goode, W. J. (1957). Community within a community: The professions. American Sociological Review, 22(2), 194–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Goode, W. J. (1960). Encroachment, charlatanism and the emerging professions: Psychology, sociology and medicine. American Journal of Sociology, 25(6), 902–914.Google Scholar
  62. Gordon, R. J. (2016). The rise and fall of American growth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Green, J. (2005). Professions and community. New Zealand Sociology, 20, 122–141.Google Scholar
  64. Gunnarsson, B.-L., Linnell, P., & Nordberg, B. (Eds.). (1997). The construction of professional discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  65. Hall, S., & Gieben, B. (Eds.). (1992). Formations of modernity. Cambridge, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Hall, S., Held, D., & McGrew, T. (Eds.). (1993). Modernity and its futures: Understanding modern societies. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press and Open University.Google Scholar
  67. Halliday, T. C. (1987). Beyond monopoly: Lawyers, state crises, and professional empowerment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  68. Hampton, M. (1999). Journalists and the ‘professional ideal’ in Britain: The Institute of Journalists, 1884–1907. Historical Research, 72(178), 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Jamous, H., & Peloille, B. (1970). Professions or self-perpetuating system? changes in the French university hospital system. In J. A. Jackson (Ed.), Professions and professionalisation (pp. 111–152). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Joecks, J., Pull, K., & Vetter, K. (2013). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm performance: What exactly constitutes a ‘critical mass?’ Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 61–72.Google Scholar
  71. Johnson, T. J. (1972). Professions and power. London: Macmillan. Republished Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
  72. Johnson, T. J. (1973). Imperialism and the professions: Notes on the development of professional occupations in Britain’s colonies and the new states. In P. Halmos (Ed.), Professionalisation and social change (pp. 281–309). Keele, UK: Keele University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Johnson, T. J. (1977). What is to be known? The structural determination of social class. Economy & Society, 6(2), 194–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Johnson, T. J. (1978). The development of accountancy links in the Commonwealth: Readings in accountancy and business research, 1970–77. London: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.Google Scholar
  75. Johnson, T. J. (1980). Work and power. In G. Esland & G. Salaman (Eds.), The politics of work and occupations (pp. 335–371). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Johnson, T. J. (1982). The state and the professions: Peculiarities of the British. In A. Giddens & G. Mackenzie (Eds.), Social class and the division of labour (pp. 186–208). Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
  77. Johnson, T. J. (1993). Expertise and the state. In T. J. Johnson & M. Gain (Eds.), Foucault’s new domains (pp. 139–152). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  78. Johnson, T. J. (1995). Governmentality and the institutionalization of expertise. In T. J. Johnson, G. Larkin, & M. Saks (Eds.), Health professions and the state in Europe (pp. 7–24). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  79. Jones, D. K., Bradley, W. V., & Oberlander, J. (2014). Pascal’s wager: Health insurance exchanges, Obamacare, and the Republican dilemma. Journal of Health Politics, Policy & Law, 39(1), 97–137. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-2395190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Kalberg, S. (1980). Max Weber’s types of rationality: Cornerstones for the analysis of rationalization processes in history. American Journal of Sociology, 85(5), 1145–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Kimball, B. A. (1995). The ‘true professional ideal’ in America. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  82. Kohn, R. D. (1922). The significance of the professional ideal: Professional ethics and the public interest. Annals of the American Academy of Political & Social Science, 101(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271622210100102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Krause, E. A. (1996). Death of the guilds: Professions, states, and the advancement of capitalism, 1930 to the present. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Kronman, A. T. (1995). The lost lawyer: Falling ideals of the legal profession. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  85. Kuhlmann, E. (2003). Gender differences, gender hierarchies and professions: An embedded approach to the German dental profession. The International Journal of Sociology & Social Policy, 23(4–5), 80–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Larson, M. S. (1977). The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  87. Larson, M. S. (2008). Response to David Sciulli’s ‘Revisionism in sociology of professions today: Conceptual approaches by Larson’. Sociologica, 2(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2383/28766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Linklater, A. (2002). Measuring America. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  89. Macdonald, K. M. (1984). Professional formation: The case of Scottish accountants. British Journal of Sociology, 35(2), 174–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Macdonald, K. M. (1995). The sociology of the professions. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  91. Martin, B. (1998a). Knowledge, identity and the middle-class: From collective to individualised class formation? The Sociological Review, 46(4), 653–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Martin, B. (1998b). Transforming the contemporary ‘new middle class’: From professionals and managers to ‘bricoleurs’? (pp. 1–28). http://hi.rutgers.edu/szelenyi60/martin.html.
  93. Mason, P. (2016). Postcapitalism. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  94. Millerson, G. (1964). Dilemmas of professionalism. New Society, 4, 15–18.Google Scholar
  95. Murphy, R. (1988). Social closure: The theory of monopolisation and exclusion. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  96. Muzio, D., & Ackroyd, S. (2005). On the consequences of defensive professionalism: Recent changes in the legal labour process. Journal of Law & Society, 32(4), 615–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. O’Neill, O. (2002). A question of trust. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  98. Parker, M. (Ed.). (1999). Ethics and community in the health care professions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  99. Payne, S., & Doyal, L. (2012). Revisiting gender justice in health and healthcare. In E. Kuhlmann, & E. Annandale (Eds.), Palgrave handbook of healthcare (2nd ed., pp. 19–35). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  100. Perrucci, R., & Gerstl, J. (1969). Professions without community: Engineers in American society. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  101. Pickard, S. (2009). The professionalization of general practitioners with a special interest: Rationalization, restratification and governmentality. Sociology, 43(2), 250–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Pitney, N. (2015, June 24). Meet the 63rd black woman in American history with a physics PhD. Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/24/chanda-prescod-weinstein_n_7574020.html.
  103. Poggi, G. (1965). A main theme of contemporary sociological analysis: Its achievements and limitations. British Journal of Sociology, 16(4), 263–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Polanyi, K. (1957). The great transformation. Boston, MA: Beacon.Google Scholar
  105. Ricoeur, P. (1981). Narrative time. In W. Mitchell (Ed.), On narrative (pp. 165–186). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  106. Ricoeur, P. (1990). Time and narrative. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  107. Rothblatt, S. (1995). How ‘professional’ are the professions? A review article—The ‘true professional ideal’ in America, a history by Bruce A. Kimball/The quest for authority and honor in the American professions, 1750–1900 by Samuel Haber and others. Comparative Studies in Society & History, 37(1), 194–204.Google Scholar
  108. Schudson, M. (1990). Origins of the ideal of objectivity in the professions. New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar
  109. Sciulli, D. (2007). Professions before professionalism. European Journal of Sociology, 48(1), 121–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Sciulli, D. (2009). Professions in civil society and the state: Invariant foundations and consequences. Boston, MA: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Shettley, M. (2016). Hidden figures: The true story of four black women and the space race. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
  112. Sølvberg, L. M., & Jarness, V. (2019). Assessing contradictions: Methodological challenges when mapping symbolic boundaries. Cultural Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975518819907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Steinmetz, G. (2013). Major contributions to sociological theory and research on empire 1830s–present. In G. Steinmetz (Ed.), Sociology and empire: The imperial entanglements of a discipline (pp. 1–50). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Suchman, M. (1995). Review of ‘The lost lawyer: Failing ideals of the legal profession’ by Anthony T. Kronman. Contemporary Sociology, 24(2), 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Susskind, R., & Susskind, D. (2015, October). The future of professions. YouTube Google Talk. London. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulXwTpW2oFI.
  116. Svensson, L. G., & Evetts, J. (Eds.). (2010). Sociology of professions. Sweden: Daidalos.Google Scholar
  117. Tamanaha, B. (2001). Socio-legal positivism and a general jurisprudence. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 21(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Torstendahl, R. (2005). The need for a definition of ‘profession’. Current Sociology, 53(6), 947–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Torstendahl, R., & Burrage, M. C. (Eds.). (1990). The formation of professions: Knowledge, state and strategy. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  120. Tousijn, W. (2006). Beyond decline: Consumerism, managerialism and the need for a new medical professionalism. Health Sociology Review, 15(5), 469–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Vollmer, H. M., & Mills, D. L. (Eds.). (1966). Professionalization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  122. Wade, L. (2015). Chart of the week: What happened to women in computer science? The Society Pages. http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2015/01/10/chart-of-the-week-what-happened-to-women-in-computer-science/.
  123. Wagner, P. (2010). Multiple trajectories of modernity: Why social theory needs historical sociology. Thesis Eleven, 100, 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Weber, M. (1958 [1919]). Bureaucracy. In H. Gerth, & C. W. Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber (pp. 196–244). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  125. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  126. Wilensky, H. L. (1964). The professionalization of everyone? American Journal of Sociology, 70(2), 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Willis, E. (2006). The sociological quest (4th ed.). Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  128. Witz, A. (1992). Professions and patriarchy. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Woolgar, S. (1988). Science: The very idea. Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood.Google Scholar
  130. Young, M., & Muller, J. (Eds.). (2014). Knowledge, expertise and the professions. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Waikato UniversityNapierNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations