Advertisement

A Review of the Risk Perception of Construction Workers in Construction Safety

  • Siu Shing ManEmail author
  • Jacky Yu Ki Ng
  • Alan Hoi Shou Chan
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1026)

Abstract

This research reviews the empirical studies on the risk perception of construction workers from January 2010 to April 2019. Results show that the risk perception of construction workers is an important construct in understanding their behavior at work. Previous studies have attempted to assess the cognitive risk perception of construction workers but have overlooked the affective risk perception of construction workers. These studies have also failed to report the content, convergent, discriminant, and criterion-related validity tests when they measured the construction workers’ risk perception. These validity tests are vital for developing a valid scale because relevant literature lacks a psychometrically sound instrument, which measures the risk perception of construction workers. Further efforts are necessary to develop a reliable and valid scale for quantifying both the cognitive and affective risk perception of construction workers.

Keywords

Construction safety Construction worker Risk perception 

References

  1. 1.
    CPWR – The Center for Construction Research and Training. Construction Chart Book. https://www.cpwr.com/sites/default/files/publications/The_6th_Edition_Construction_eChart_Book.pdf
  2. 2.
    Guo, H., Yu, Y., Skitmore, M.: Visualization technology-based construction safety management: a review. Autom. Constr. 73, 135–144 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhou, Z., Goh, Y.M., Li, Q.: Overview and analysis of safety management studies in the construction industry. Saf. Sci. 72, 337–350 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Man, S.S., Chan, A.H.S., Wong, H.M.: Risk-taking behaviors of Hong Kong construction workers-a thematic study. Saf. Sci. 98, 25–36 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fleming, M., Lardner, R.: Strategies to Promote Safe Behaviour as Part of a Health and Safety Management System. HSE Books, Norwich (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaplan, S., Garrick, B.J.: On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal. 1(1), 11–27 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aven, T.: A unified framework for risk and vulnerability analysis covering both safety and security. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 92(6), 745–754 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baloi, D., Price, A.D.F.: Modelling global risk factors affecting construction cost performance. Int. J. Project Manage. 21(4), 261–269 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mosteller, F., Nogee, P.: An experimental measurement of utility. J. Polit. Econ. 59(5), 371–404 (1951)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Edwards, W.: Probability-preferences in gambling. Am. J. Psychol. 66(3), 349–364 (1953)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Lichtenstein, S.: Why study risk perception? Risk Anal. 2(2), 83–93 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Slovic, P.: Perception of risk. Science 236(4799), 280–285 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen, C.: Perceived risk, usage frequency of mobile banking services. Managing Serv. Qual. Int. J. 23(5), 410–436 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rhodes, N., Pivik, K.: Age and gender differences in risky driving: the roles of positive affect and risk perception. Accid. Anal. Prev. 43(3), 923–931 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bohm, J., Harris, D.: Risk perception and risk-taking behavior of construction site dumper drivers. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 16(1), 55–67 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hallowell, M.: Safety risk perception in construction companies in the Pacific Northwest of the USA. Constr. Manag. Econ. 28(4), 403–413 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Caponecchia, C., Sheils, I.: Perceptions of personal vulnerability to workplace hazards in the Australian construction industry. J. Saf. Res. 42(4), 253–258 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Arezes, P.M., Bizarro, M.: Alcohol consumption and risk perception in the Portuguese construction industry. Open Occup. Health Saf. J. 3, 10–17 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lu, S., Yan, H.: A comparative study of the measurements of perceived risk among contractors in China. Int. J. Project Manage. 31(2), 307–312 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lopez del Puerto, C., Clevenger, C.M., Boremann, K., Gilkey, D.P.: Exploratory study to identify perceptions of safety and risk among residential Latino construction workers as distinct from commercial and heavy civil construction workers. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 140(2), 04013048 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Perlman, A., Sacks, R., Barak, R.: Hazard recognition and risk perception in construction. Saf. Sci. 64, 22–31 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rodríguez-Garzón, I., Lucas-Ruiz, V., Martínez-Fiestas, M., Delgado-Padial, A.: Association between perceived risk and training in the construction industry. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 141(5), 04014095 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gürcanlı, G.E., Baradan, S., Uzun, M.: Risk perception of construction equipment operators on construction sites of Turkey. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 46, 59–68 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Carriço, A., Gomes, A.R.C., Gonçalves, A.P.: Quantitative analysis of the construction industry workers’ perception of risk in municipalities surrounding Salvador. Procedia Manuf. 3, 1846–1853 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang, P., Lingard, H., Blismas, N., Wakefield, R., Kleiner, B.: Work-health and safety-risk perceptions of construction-industry stakeholders using photograph-based Q methodology. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 141(5), 04014093 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhao, D., McCoy, A.P., Kleiner, B.M., Mills, T.H., Lingard, H.: Stakeholder perceptions of risk in construction. Saf. Sci. 82, 111–119 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang, C.M., Xu, B.B., Zhang, S.J., Chen, Y.Q.: Influence of personality and risk propensity on risk perception of Chinese construction project managers. Int. J. Project Manage. 34(7), 1294–1304 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Xia, N., Wang, X., Griffin, M.A., Wu, C., Liu, B.: Do we see how they perceive risk? An integrated analysis of risk perception and its effect on workplace safety behavior. Accid. Anal. Prev. 106, 234–242 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Namian, M., Albert, A., Feng, J.: Effect of distraction on hazard recognition and safety risk perception. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 144(4), 04018008 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Low, B.K.L., Man, S.S., Chan, A.H.S.: The risk-taking propensity of construction workers—an application of quasi-expert interview. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15(10), 2250–2260 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pandit, B., Albert, A., Patil, Y., Al-Bayati, A.J.: Impact of safety climate on hazard recognition and safety risk perception. Saf. Sci. 113, 44–53 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Low, B.K.L., Man, S.S., Chan, A.H.S., Alabdulkarim, S.: Construction worker risk-taking behavior model with individual and organizational factors. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16(8), 1335–1347 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rundmo, T.: Safety climate, attitudes and risk perception in Norsk Hydro. Saf. Sci. 34(1–3), 47–59 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Siu Shing Man
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jacky Yu Ki Ng
    • 1
  • Alan Hoi Shou Chan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering ManagementCity University of Hong KongKowloon TongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations