Process Operator Students’ Abilities to Assess OSH Risks

  • Noora NenonenEmail author
  • Sanna Nenonen
  • Sari Tappura
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1026)


Safety competence is an important process operator skill. Due to hazardous work assignment and environments, skills in assessing the risks related to occupational safety and health (OSH) are especially important. Carrying out risk assessments can be difficult, and several problems have been identified. The aim of this study was to discover how well process operator students are able to assess OSH-related risks. Risk assessment exercises with observations were carried out for students (n = 35) in three vocational education and training (VET) organizations. The results showed that all students were able to identify at least some hazards. The students identified the most probable, high-risk, and easily observable hazards. Those with previous training or experience in work and risk assessment were more capable of identifying a wide range of risks. We conclude that successful risk assessment requires related competence, which should be developed via theoretical and practical learning during VET.


Hazard recognition Risk identification Risk assessment Workplace safety Manufacturing industry 



The authors gratefully acknowledge the Finnish Work Environment Fund for the funding of this study and the teachers and students of the cooperating VET organizations for their contributions.


  1. 1.
    Rodríguez, M., Díaz, I.: A systematic and integral hazards analysis technique applied to the process industry. J. Loss Prevent. Process Ind. 43, 721–729 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nazir, S., Sorensen, L.J., Øvergård, K.I., Manca, D.: How distributed situation awareness influences process safety. Chem. Eng. Trans. 36, 409–414 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tappura, S., Kivistö-Rahnasto, J.: Annual school safety activity calendar to promote safety in VET. In: Arezes, P.M., et al. (eds.) Occupational Safety and Hygiene VI: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Occupation Safety and Hygiene (SHO 2018), pp. 131–135. CRC Press, London (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tappura, S., Nenonen, S, Nenonen, N.: Developing safety competence process for vocational students. In: Ahram T., Karwowski W., Taiar, R. (eds.) Human Systems Engineering and Design, IHSED 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 876, pp. 668–674. Springer, Cham (2018)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Council Directive 89/391/EEC on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work (1989)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    European Agency for Safety and Health at Work: Summary - Second European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks (ESENER 2). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Laberge, M., Ledoux, E.: Occupational health and safety issues affecting young workers: a literature review. Work 39(3), 215–232 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Salminen, S.: Have young workers more injuries than older ones? An international literature review. J. Saf. Res. 35(5), 513–521 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Albert, A., Hallowell, M.R., Skaggs, M., Kleiner, B.: Empirical measurement and improvement of hazard recognition skill. Saf. Sci. 93, 1–8 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bahn, S.: Workplace hazard identification and management: the case of an underground mining operation. Saf. Sci. 57, 129–137 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heikkilä, A.-M., Malmén, Y., Nissilä, M., Kortelainen, H.: Challenges in risk management in multi-company industrial parks. Saf. Sci. 48, 430–435 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carter, G., Smith, S.: Safety hazard identification on construction projects. J. Construct. Eng. Manage. 132(2), 197–205 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haslam, R.A., Hide, S.A., Gibb, A.G.F., Gyi, D.E., Pavitt, T., Atkinson, S., Duff, A.R.: Contributing factors in construction accidents. Appl. Ergon. 36, 401–415 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ministry of Social Affairs and Health: Riskien arviointi työpaikalla – työkirja. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health and The Centre for Occupational Safety (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Unit of Industrial Engineering and ManagementTampere UniversityTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations