Advertisement

Kaleidoscope of User Involvement – Product Development Methods in an Interdisciplinary Context

  • Anne WallischEmail author
  • Olga Sankowski
  • Dieter Krause
  • Kristin Paetzold
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1026)

Abstract

Involving user perspectives into product development activities means involving empiric science methods into engineering sciences. On the one hand, human-centered research methods should assist engineering designers in problem definition, solution generation, decision-making and evaluation aligned to the users. On the other hand, different research logics and approaches of problem solving can be an obstacle to the application of methods from other disciplines. The article presents a terminology aimed at supporting interdisciplinary understanding of methods and its underlying conceptualizations.

Keywords

Design methodology Interdisciplinary design User-centered design User involvement User research methods 

References

  1. 1.
    Kim, J., Wilemon, D.: Focusing the fuzzy front-end in new product development. R&D Manag. 32, 269–279 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sanders, E.B.-N., Stappers, P.J.: Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-Design 4, 5–18 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cavaye, A.L.M.: User participation in system development revisited. Inf. Manag. 28, 311–323 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wallisch, A., Sankowski, O., Krause, D., Paetzold, K.: Overcoming fuzzy design practice: revealing potentials of user-centered design research and methodological concepts related to user involvement. In: 25th ICE/IEEE International Technology Management Conference, Nizza, France (2019)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Geyer, F., Lehnen, J., Herstatt, C.: Customer Need Identification Methods in New Product Development: What Works “Best”? (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877018500086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kujala, S.: Effective user involvement in product development by improving the analysis of user needs. Behav. Inf. Technol. 27, 457–473 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    ISO 9241-11:2018: Ergonomics of human-system interaction – Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts (2018)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zogaj, S., Bretschneider, U.: Customer integration in new product development: a literature review concerning the appropriateness of different customer integration methods to attain customer knowledge (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2485240
  9. 9.
    Olsen, T.O., Welo, T.: Maximizing product innovation through adaptive application of user-centered methods for defining costumer value. J. Technol. Innov. 6, 172–192 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kremer, S., Lindemann, U.: A framework for understanding, communicating and evaluating user experience potentials. In: 20th ICED International Conference on Engineering Design, Milano, Italy (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bae, J., Cho, K., Kim, C.: Developing a framework of new mixed method, social networking services group diary and its application in practice. In: 20th ICED International Conference on Engineering Design, Milano, Italy (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Prahalad, C.K., Ramaswamy, V.: Co-creation experiences: the next practice in value creation. J. Interact. Mark. 18, 5–14 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Verschuere, B., Brandsen, T., Pestoff, V.: Co-production: the state of the art in research and the future agenda. Voluntas 23, 1083–1101 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Voorberg, W.H., Bekkers, V.J.J.M., Tummers, L.G.: A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Manag. Rev. 17, 1333–1357 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Blessing, L.T.M., Chakrabarti, A.: DRM - A Design Research Methodology. Springer, London (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eckert, C.M., Clarckson, P.J., Stacey, M.K.: The spiral of applied research: a methodological view on integrated design research. In: 14th ICED International Conference on Engineering Design, Stockholm, Sweden (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gericke, K., Eckert, C.M., Stacy, M.K.: What do we need to say about a design method? In: 21th ICED International Conference on Engineering Design, Vancouver, Canada (2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gerring, R.J.: Psychology and Life, 20th edn. Pearson International, London (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wundt, W.: An Introduction to Psychology. George Allen & Unwin Limited, London (1924)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Wallisch
    • 1
    Email author
  • Olga Sankowski
    • 2
  • Dieter Krause
    • 2
  • Kristin Paetzold
    • 1
  1. 1.Universität der Bundeswehr MünchenNeubibergGermany
  2. 2.Technische Universität HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations