S-FES: A Structure-Driven Modeling Strategy for Product Innovation Design

  • Jinyu Lin
  • Wenyu WuEmail author
  • Chengqi Xue
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1026)


In this paper, based on the evolution of the functional solution model, a number of different (function-behavior-structure) FBS functional design mapping models are presented. It has found many limitations of the existing function solving model. The reuse of knowledge and mapping of post-redesign are separated. The order of mapping is difficult to judge in the image, cannot be integrated into the innovation redesign stage. The order of mapping is blurry. And the changing environment is not expressed in the image. Therefore, this paper optimizes the design of the FBS mapping model for knowledge reuse, as well as images. An innovative design model S-FES including the above structure or behavior is proposed, which overcomes the above shortcomings and improves the efficiency of the FBS model. The practicality of the new model is illustrated by taking a shoe washing machine as an example.


Functional solution model FBS Mapping model Innovation design 



This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, project number is 71871056 and 71471037.


  1. 1.
    Weisbrod, G., Kroll, E.: Idea-configuration-evaluation (ICE): development and demonstration of a new prescriptive model of the conceptual engineering design process based on parameter analysis and C–K theory. Res. Eng. Des. 29, 1–23 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, Y., Zhao, M., Xie, Y., et al.: A new model of conceptual design based on scientific ontology and intentionality theory. part II: the process model. Des. Stud. 38, 139–160 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aubriot, O., Fernandez, S., Trottier, J., et al.: Water technology, knowledge and power. addressing them simultaneously. Wiley Interdisc. Rev. Water 5, e1261 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Qian, L., Gero, J.S.: Function–behavior–structure paths and their role in analogy-based design. AI EDAM 10, 289(1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, Y., Zhang, Z., Xie, Y., et al.: A new model of conceptual design based on Scientific Ontology and intentionality theory. part I: the conceptual foundation. Des. Stud. 37, 12–36 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang, M., Li, G., et al.: A hierarchical functional solving framework with hybrid mappings for supporting the design process in the conceptual phase. J. Eng. Manufact. 226, 1401–1415 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gero, J.S., Fujii, H.: A computational framework for concept formation for a situated design agent. Knowl.-Based Syst. 13, 361–368 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gero, J.S., Kannengiesser, U.: The situated function–behavior–structure framework. Des. Stud. 25, 373–391 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Suwa, M., Gero, J., Purcell, T.: Unexpected discoveries and S-invention of design requirements: important vehicles for a design process. Des. Stud. 21, 539–567 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang, W.Y., Lin, L.F., et al.: B-FES/o: an ontology-based scheme for functional modeling in design for semantic web applications. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design 2005, vol. 2, pp. 24–26. IEEE Press, Coventry (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cascini, G., Fantoni, G., Montagna, F.: Situating needs and requirements in the FBS framework. Des. Stud. 34, 636–662 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang, W.Y., Tor, S.B., Britton, G.A.: A graph and matrix representation scheme for functional design of mechanical products. Int. J. Adv. Manufact. Technol. 25, 221–232 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringSoutheast UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations