Advertisement

Effects of the Use of Smart Glasses on Eyesight

  • Natasa Vujica Herzog
  • Amer BeharicEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1026)

Abstract

Smart glasses, also named as data glasses, are an example of Head Mounted Display (HMD) with a great potential in different manufacturing environments. They collect data from a wireless network and project information directly into the user’s eye. It is evidenced from the literature that HMD can cause headaches, pressure in the eyes, problems with focusing and difficulties with text reading. Therefore, we tried to research whether use of smart glasses could be harmful for the human eye or not. To study the addressed problems, a research was performed in testing warehouse environment at the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering. Users comfort was tested through questionnaire and several eyes investigations before and after use of smart glasses in Healthcare Center Maribor. The results of the performed ophthalmologic tests show that there are some statistically significant differences between tests results performed before and after use of smart glasses that cannot be overlooked.

Keywords

Human-systems integration Smart glasses Industry 4.0 Warehouse 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Slovenian Research Agency in the framework of Grant P2-0190. The research was funded by The Public Scholarship, Development, Disability and Maintenance Fund of the Republic of Slovenia.

References

  1. 1.
    Hein, D.W.E., Jodoin, J.L., Rauschnabel, P.A., Ivens, B.S.: Are Wearables Good or Bad for Society? An Exploration of Societal Benefits, Risks, and Consequences of Augmented Reality Smart Glasses, Chapter 1 in Mobile Technologies and Augmented Reality in Open Education, IGI Global, USA (2017).  https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2110-5.ch001
  2. 2.
    Rauschnabel, P.A., Brem, A., Ivens, B.S.: Who will buy smart glasses? Comput. Hum. Behav. 49, 635–647 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rauschnabel, P.A., Ro, Y.K.: Augmented reality smart glasses: an investigation of technology acceptance drivers (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Peli, E.: Visual and optometric issues with head-mounted displays. In: Proceedings of the IS&T Optics & Imaging in the Information Age, The Society for Imaging Science and Technology, pp. 364–369 (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Klein-Theyer, A., Horwath-Winter, J., Rabensteiner, D.F., Schwantzer, G., Wultsch, G:. The impact of visual guided order picking on ocular comfort, ocular surface and tear function. PLoS One 11(6) (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Josefsson, P., Lingegard, S.: Potential of Smart Glasses in a Spare Parts Distribution Center. Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peli, E.: Visual issue in the use of a head mounted monocular display. Opt. Eng. 29(8), 883–892 (1990).  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.55674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schuff, D., Corral, K., Turetken, O.: Comparing the understandability of alternative data warehouse schemas: an empirical study. Decis. Support Syst. 52(1), 9–20 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2011.04.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jungmin, H., Seon Hee, B., Hyeon-Jeong, S.: Comparison of visual discomfort and visual fatigue between head-mounted display and smartphone. In: Proceedings of the IS&T International Symposium on Electronic Imaging, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging, Society for Imaging Science and Technology, pp. 212–217 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.2352/issn.2470-1173.2017.14.hvei-146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rosenfield, M.: Computer vision syndrome: a review of ocular causes and potential treatments. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 31, 502–515 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    De Koster, R., Le-Duc, T., Roodbergen, K.J.: Design and control of warehouse order picking: a literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 182(2), 481–501 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Parede, T.R., et al.: Quality of vision in refractive and cataract surgery, indirect measurers: review article. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 72(6), 386–390 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Karatepe, A.S., Köse, S., Eğrilmez, S.: Factors affecting contrast sensitivity in healthy individuals: a pilot study. Turk. J. Ophthalmol. 47(2), 80–84 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ramulu, P., Salim, S.: Standard Automated Perimetry. http://eyewiki.aao.org/Standard_Automated_Perimetry

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of MariborMariborSlovenia
  2. 2.Healthcare Center Dr. Adolfa Drolca MariborMariborSlovenia

Personalised recommendations