Advertisement

The Importance of ICT and Wearable Devices in Monitoring the Health Status of Coronary Patients

  • Pedro SobreiroEmail author
  • Abílio Oliveira
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1026)

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of death in the world, despite its avoidable nature, as in the case of coronary artery disease. The healthcare technology market trends make access to information and communication technologies (ICT), including wearable devices, increasingly available to the general population. Understanding the perspectives of healthcare professionals in the use of these technologies in clinical settings for surveillance and promotion of the health status of patients with coronary diseases may help to bring technological advances closer to the expectations of clinical practice. After two sessions of focus groups, we present the results obtained from the textual analysis of the discussion between Nurses, Cardiac Physiologists, Physiotherapists, and Physicians. The findings of this study are important in the domain of adoption and acceptance of technology in health care and contribute (with a set of items) to the development of a questionnaire, to be used in a subsequent study.

Keywords

Health status Coronary patients Information and communication technologies (ICT) Wearable devices Adoption and acceptance of technology 

References

  1. 1.
    Mendis, S., Weltgesundheitsorganisation, World Heart Federation (eds.): Global Atlas on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Control. World Health Organization, Geneva (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    OECD: Health at a Glance 2017. OECD Publishing, Paris (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1787/health_glance-2017-en
  3. 3.
    Khan, N., Marvel, F.A., Wang, J., Martin, S.S.: Digital Health Technologies to Promote Lifestyle Change and Adherence. Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 19 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-017-0560-4
  4. 4.
    del Hoyo-Barbolla, E., Arredondo, M.T., Ortega-Portillo, M., Fernandez, N., Villalba-Mora, E.: A new approach to model the adoption of e-health. Presented at the (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1109/MELCON.2006.1653319
  5. 5.
    Buys, R., Claes, J., Walsh, D., Cornelis, N., Moran, K., Budts, W., Woods, C., Cornelissen, V.A.: Cardiac patients show high interest in technology enabled cardiovascular rehabilitation. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Making 16 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-016-0329-9
  6. 6.
    Silva, B.M.C., Rodrigues, J.J.P.C., de la Torre Díez, I., López-Coronado, M., Saleem, K.: Mobile-health: a review of current state in 2015. J. Biomed. Inform. 56, 265–272 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2015.06.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gund, A., Lindecrantz, K., Schaufelberger, M., Patel, H., Sjöqvist, B.A.: Attitudes among healthcare professionals towards ICT and home follow-up in chronic heart failure care. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Making. 12 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-138
  8. 8.
    Olla, P., Shimskey, C.: mHealth taxonomy: a literature survey of mobile health applications. Health Technol. 4, 299–308 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-014-0093-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sadegh, S.S., Khakshour Saadat, P., Sepehri, M.M., Assadi, V.: A framework for m-health service development and success evaluation. Int. J. Med. Inform. 112, 123–130 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.01.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marakhimov, A., Joo, J.: Consumer adaptation and infusion of wearable devices for healthcare. Comput. Hum. Behav. 76, 135–148 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gatzoulis, L., Iakovidis, I.: Wearable and portable eHealth systems. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 26, 51–56 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1109/EMB.2007.901787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pevnick, J.M., Birkeland, K., Zimmer, R., Elad, Y., Kedan, I.: Wearable technology for cardiology: an update and framework for the future. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 28, 144–150 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcm.2017.08.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leximancer Pty Ltd.: Leximancer User Guide. Release 4.5, p. 141 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL)LisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), ISTAR-IULLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations