Advertisement

Introduction

  • Anthony Keith Thompson
  • Suriyan Supapvanich
  • Jiraporn Sirison
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Food, Health, and Nutrition book series (BRIEFSFOOD)

Abstract

Bananas are probably the most important fresh fruit in the world in terms of production and international trade, but it is a very delicate fruit that is easily damaged and has a comparatively short marketable life. Bananas are harvested while still green and unripe and allowed to ripen naturally or, more commonly, treated with a chemical to initiate ripening. The chemical and physical changes that occur during banana ripening and the way they can be controlled has been the subject of an enormous number of research papers for more than a century. This book deals exclusively with how bananas are ripened. However, the technology used is based on, and has implications with, a whole range of factors. These include the cultivar, growing conditions and how and at what maturity the fruit are harvested and handled. Also, various preharvest and postharvest treatments can be applied to bananas and how these impact with the ripening process can have effects. There are well established successful technologies that have evolved and are applied, particularly in more developed temperate countries where bananas are imported. However, most bananas are marketed locally in the country where they are grown and often different technologies are used in the ripening process, which have technical, economic and health implication. All these factors are discussed and interacting implications are considered.

References

  1. Anonymous. (2012). Banana ripening manual. Boston: United Fruit Sales Corp.Google Scholar
  2. Calberto, G., Staver, C., & Siles, P. (2015). An assessment of global banana production and suitability under climate change scenarios. In A. Elbehri (Ed.), Climate change and food systems. Global assessments and implications for food security and trade (pp. 264–291). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  3. Cheesman, E. E. (1947–1949). Classification of the bananas. Kew Bulletin 1947, 106–117. 1948, 11–28, 145–157, 323–328, 1949, 23–28, 133–137, 265–272, 445–449.Google Scholar
  4. Christelová, P., Valarik, M., Hřibová, E., De Langhe, E., & Doležel, J. (2011). A multigene sequence-based phylogeny of the Musaceae (banana) family. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 11, 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christelová, P., De Langhe, E., Hřibová, E., Čížková, J., Sardos, J., Hušáková, M., Van den houwe, I., Sutanto, A., Kepler, A. K., Swennen, R., Roux, N., & Doležel, J. (2017). Molecular and cytological characterization of the global Musa germplasm collection provides insights into the treasure of banana diversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26, 801–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daniells, J., Jenny, C., Karamura, D., & Tomekpe, K. (Eds.). (2001). Musalogue: t of controlled atmosphere storage on ripening and quality of banan Musa. A catalogue of Musa germplasm. Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI).Google Scholar
  7. Davies, P. N. (1990). Fyffes and the banana. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  8. Deepthi, V. P. (2016). Taxonomic scoring and genomic grouping in bananas. Flora and Fauna, 22, 151158.Google Scholar
  9. Embrapa. (2014). Sistema de Produção da Bananeira Irrigada: Cultivares. Embrapa Semiárido http://sistemasdeproducao.cnptia.embrapa.br/FontesHTML/Banana/BananeiraIrrigada/cultivares.htm. Accessed 2 July 2015.
  10. FAOStat. (2019). http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data. Accessed 5 May 2019.
  11. Goswami, M. K., & Handique, F. J. (2013). Explants size response to in vitro propagation of Musa (AAA Group) ‘Amritsagar’ Musa (AAB Group) ‘Malbhog’ and Musa (AAB Group) ‘Chenichampa’ banana. Indian Journal of Applied Research, 3, 40–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heslop-Harrison, J. S., & Schwarzacher, T. (2007). Domestication, genomics and the future for banana. Annals of Botany, 1073–1084.Google Scholar
  13. Jones, D. R. (Ed.). (2000). Diseases of banana, abacá and enset. Wallingford: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Jones, D. R. (2009). Diseases and pests: Constraints to banana production. Acta Horticulturae, 828, 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Molina, G. (2019). Bioversity International – Asia Pacific, Philippine Office: http://banana-networks.org/Bapnet/2016/02/05/kluai-namwa-foc-tr4-resistant-variety/. Accessed 11 March 2019.
  16. Nelson, S. C., & Javier, F. B. (2007). Trials of FHIA banana varieties for resistance to black leaf streak in Pohnpei FSM. 38th Hawaii Banana Industry Association Annual Conference, Kalaeloa, Hawaii, Aug. 24, 2007. https://www.ctahr.hawaii.edu/nelsons/HBIA_2007_Nelson_Javier.pdf. Accessed 28 March 2019.
  17. Ploetz, R. C., Kepler, A. K., Daniels, J., & Nelson, S. C. (2007). Banana and plantain – An overview with emphasis of Pacific Island. Hōlualoa: Permanent Agriculture Resources.Google Scholar
  18. Porcher, M. H. (1998). The University of Melbourne. http://www.plantnames.unimelb.edu.au/Sorting/Musa-cvs.html. Accessed 17 April 2019.
  19. Simmonds, N. W., & Shepherd, K. (1955). The taxonomy and origins of the cultivated bananas. Journal of the Linnaean Society, 55, 302–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stover, R. H., & Simmonds, N. W. (1987). Bananas (3rd ed.). London: Longmans.Google Scholar
  21. Svanes, E., & Aronsson, A. K. S. (2013). Carbon footprint of a Cavendish banana supply chain. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18, 1450–1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Von Loesecke, H. W. (1949). Bananas. London: Interscience.Google Scholar
  23. Wardlaw, C. W. (1961). Banana diseases. London: Longmans.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony Keith Thompson
    • 1
  • Suriyan Supapvanich
    • 1
  • Jiraporn Sirison
    • 1
  1. 1.King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology LadkrabangBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations