Advertisement

Lines and Boxes: The Geometry of Thought

  • Barbara TverskyEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The Frontiers Collection book series (FRONTCOLL)

Abstract

Lines simplify and abstract; they also focus attention, leading a body or a mind from place to place. The eye creates lines where there are none, connecting occluded fragments to perceive objects. The body creates lines in the world on paths, on bookshelves, and on streets. The hand creates lines on the page to represent things and ideas, organized and messy. The mind creates lines, moving from thought to thought.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Julie Heiser, Jeff Zacks, Masaki Suwa, Azadeh Jamalian, Juliet Chou, Andrea Kantrowitz, Valeria Giardino, Melissa Zrada, and Yang Liu for years of collaboration. The following grants facilitated the research and/or preparation of the manuscript: National Science Foundation CHS-1513841, HHC 0905417, IIS-0725223, IIS-0855995, and REC 0440103, and Office of Naval Research NOOO14-PP-1-O649, N000140110717, and N000140210534 and The Varieties of Understanding Project at Fordham University and The John Templeton Foundation. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Varieties of Understanding Project, Fordham University, or The John Templeton Foundation.

References

  1. Collin, S.H., Milivojevic, B., Doeller, C.F.: Hippocampal hierarchical networks for space, time, and memory. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 17, 71–76 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Constantinescu, A.O., O’Reilly, J.X., Behrens, T.E.: Organizing conceptual knowledge in humans with a gridlike code. Science 352(6292), 1464–1468 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deuker, L., Bellmund, J.L., Schröder, T.N., Doeller, C.F.: An event map of memory space in the hippocampus. Elife 5, e16534 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eichenbaum, H., Cohen, N.J.: Can we reconcile the declarative memory and spatial navigation views on hippocampal function? Neuron 83(4), 764–770 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Epstein, R.A., Patai, E.Z., Julian, J.B., Spiers, H.J.: The cognitive map in humans: spatial navigation and beyond. Nat. Neurosci. 20(11), 1504 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Garvert, M.M., Dolan, R.J., Behrens, T.E.: A map of abstract relational knowledge in the human hippocampal–entorhinal cortex. Elife 6, e17086 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hassabis, D., Maguire, E.A.: Deconstructing episodic memory with construction. Trends Cognit. Sci. 11(7), 299–306 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Howard, I.P., Templeton, W.B.: Human spatial orientation. Wiley, Oxford (1966)Google Scholar
  9. Kantrowitz, A.: What artists do (and say) when they draw. In: Zacks, J.M., Taylor, H.A. (eds.) Representations in mind and world: Essays inspired by Barbara Tversky, pp. 209–220. Routledge, NY (2018)Google Scholar
  10. Milivojevic, B., Doeller, C.F.: Mnemonic networks in the hippocampal formation: From spatial maps to temporal and conceptual codes. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 142(4), 1231 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Moser, E.I., Kropff, E., Moser, M.B.: Place cells, grid cells, and the brain’s spatial representation system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 31, (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mullally, S.L., Maguire, E.A.: Memory, imagination, and predicting the future: a common brain mechanism? Neuroscience 20(3), 220–234 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. O’Keefe, J., Nadel, L.: The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1978)Google Scholar
  14. Poppenk, J., Evensmoen, H.R., Moscovitch, M., Nadel, L.: Long-axis specialization of the human hippocampus. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17(5), 230–240 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schacter, D.L., Benoit, R.G., Szpunar, K.K.: Episodic future thinking: Mechanisms and functions. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 17, 41–50 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Scoville, W.B., Milner, B.: Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 20(1), 11 (1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Talmy, L.: How language structures space. Spatial orientation, pp. 225–282. Springer, Boston, MA (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tversky, B.: Distortions in memory for maps. Cogn. Psychol. 13(3), 407–433 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tversky, B.: Mind in motion: How action shapes thought. Basic Books, NY (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tversky, B.: Visualizing thought. Top. Cogn. Sci. 3(3), 499–535 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tversky, B., Heiser, J., Lee, P., Daniel, M-P.: Explanations in gesture, diagram, and word. In: Coventry, K.R., Tenbrink, T., Bateman, J.A. (eds.) Spatial language and dialogue, pp. 119–131. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tversky, B., Suwa, M.: Thinking with sketches. In: Markman, A.B., Wood, K.L. (eds.) Tools for innovation: The science behind the practical methods that drive new ideas. Oxford, NY (2009)Google Scholar
  23. Tversky, B., Zacks, J., Lee, P., Heiser, J.: Lines, blobs, crosses and arrows: Diagrammatic communication with schematic figures. In: International conference on theory and application of diagrams, pp. 221–230. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Columbia UniversityNYUSA
  2. 2.Stanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations