Advertisement

Organic Tomatoes in Italy

  • Michele Donati
  • Marianna Guareschi
  • Mario VenezianiEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Italy is the second most important processed tomato producer in the world, at 13.6% of the world production of processed tomatoes. Almost half of the Italian production originates in the tomato cluster of northern Italy, and the lion’s share of the cultivated area is concentrated in Emilia Romagna. Organic tomato growing and production can be considered niche activities – accounting for only 6.6% of the utilized agricultural area – but they are subject to increasing consumer demand. The northern Italy tomato cluster is characterized by a unique governance mechanism which brings together producer associations, associations of producer associations and processor associations in an inter-branch organization. Partly because of the existence of this unique governance mechanism, organic processed tomatoes in the northern Italy cluster appear to be more sustainable than their reference product in almost all the domains measured by the systematic indicators employed in the assessment. Organic tomatoes do not perform better than their reference product in terms of export share, blue water footprint and gender equality.

References

  1. Almeida, J., Achten, W. M. J., Verbist, B., Heuts, R. F., Schrevens, E., & Muys, B. (2014). Carbon and water footprints and energy use of greenhouse tomato production in Northern Italy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 18(6), 898–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bellassen, V., Giraud, G., Hilal, M., Arfini, F., Barczak, A., Bodini, A., Brennan, M., Drut, M., Duboys de Labarre, M., Gorton, M., Hartmann, M., Majewski, E., Monier-Dilhan, S., Muller, P., Poméon, T., Tocco, B., Tregear, A., Veneziani, M., Vergote, M.-H., Vitterso, G., Wavresky, P., & Wilkinson, A. (2016). Methods and indicators for measuring the social, environmental and economic impacts of food quality schemes, short food supply chains and varying public sector food procurement policies on agri-food chain participants and rural territories. Deliverable 3.2 of the Strength2Food Project. [Online], available at https://www.strength2food.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/D3_2_Methodological-Handbook.pdf. Last accessed 6 May 2019.
  3. Canali, G. (2012). Il pomodoro da industria nel nord Italia: l’innovazione organizzativa per migliorare la competitività. Agriregionieuropa, anno 8 n°30.Google Scholar
  4. Clune, E., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140(2), 766–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fanfani, R., & Pieri, R. (2017). Il sistema agro-alimentare dell’Emilia-Romagna. Rapporto 2017. Unioncamere e Regione Emilia-Romagna Assessorato Agricoltura, Caccia e Pesca.Google Scholar
  6. Gray, R. (2009). Tomatoes annual report. Gain Report. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. Roma.Google Scholar
  7. Halpern, D. (1999). Social capital: The new golden goose. Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Cambridge University. Unpublished review.Google Scholar
  8. IO. (2017). Report Conclusivo. OI Pomodoro da Industria-Nord Italia. [Online], available at http://www.oipomodoronorditalia.it/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/REPORT-2017.pdf. Last accessed 3 May 2019.
  9. IO. (2018). Report Conclusivo. OI Pomodoro da Industria-Nord Italia. [Online], available at http://www.oipomodoronorditalia.it/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/REPORT-2018.pdf. Last accessed 3 May 2019.
  10. ISMEA- Istituto di Servizi del Mercato Agroalimentare. (2017). I numeri della filiera del pomodoro da industria. Roma: ISMEAGoogle Scholar
  11. Mantino, F., & Forcina, B. (2018). Market, policies and local governance as drivers of environmental public benefits: the case of the localised processed tomato in Northern Italy. Agriculture, 8, 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. OI Northern Italy Tomato for Industry. (2015). Passata, Polpa e Concentrato di Pomodoro Product Environmental Footprint Report. Product Environmental Footprint Enhanced by Regions – Life PREFER Project.Google Scholar
  13. Periti, F. (1998). Agricoltura e istituzioni agrarie a Piacenza. Piacenza: TIP.LE.CO.Google Scholar
  14. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone – the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  15. Röös, E., & Karlsson, H. (2013). Effect of eating seasonal on the carbon footprint of Swedish vegetable consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michele Donati
    • 1
  • Marianna Guareschi
    • 2
  • Mario Veneziani
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental SustainabilityUniversità di ParmaParmaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Economics and ManagementUniversità di ParmaParmaItaly

Personalised recommendations