Advertisement

Motivation: A Valuation Systems Perspective

  • Andero Uusberg
  • Gaurav Suri
  • Carol Dweck
  • James J. GrossEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Nebraska Symposium on Motivation book series (NSM, volume 66)

Abstract

Why do people do what they do? The field of motivation offers many different answers to this question, and in this chapter, we integrate a number of these answers by offering a novel perspective that views motivational processes as emerging from distributed yet highly interactive valuation systems that guide behavior. Each valuation system consists of hierarchical perception loops that use ascending feedback control to match mental models to the world and hierarchical action loops that use descending feedback control to match means to ends. Motivational force and direction emerge from distributed valuation system dynamics on three broad levels of complexity. On the first inherent motivation level, predictability and competence motives emerge from aggregated gap reduction imperatives of the perception and action loops. On the second intentional motivation level, committed goals and feedback control of goal pursuit emerge from synchronized valuation systems. On the third identity motivation level, goals about goals, or identity, and pursuits of pursuits, or self-regulation, emerge from synchronized intentional motivation. Each level of emergent motivation can produce affective feelings that modulate valuation systems and facilitate learning. The valuation systems perspective integrates key insights about motivation and demonstrates how complex motivational phenomena can emerge from basic perception and action processes.

Keywords

Motivational processes Valuation systems Mental models Perception loops Action loops Intrinsic motivation Intentional motivation Identity motivation Self-regulation Learning 

References

  1. Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E., & Teasdale, J. D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 49–74.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Abuhamdeh, S., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2012). The importance of challenge for the enjoyment of intrinsically motivated, goal-directed activities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 317–330.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211427147CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams, R. A., Shipp, S., & Friston, K. J. (2013). Predictions not commands: Active inference in the motor system. Brain Structure and Function, 218, 611–643.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-012-0475-5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Alexopoulos, T., Muller, D., Ric, F., & Marendaz, C. (2012). I, me, mine: Automatic attentional capture by self-related stimuli. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 770–779.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alicke, M. D., & Sedikides, C. (2009). Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they are and what they do. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 1–48.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280802613866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ashby, W. R. (1954). Design for a brain. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359–372.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043445CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Baldassano, C., Hasson, U., & Norman, K. A. (2018). Representation of real-world event schemas during narrative perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 38, 9689–9699.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0251-18.2018CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Ballard, D. H. (2017). Brain computation as hierarchical abstraction. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Bar, M. (2007). The proactive brain: Using analogies and associations to generate predictions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 280–289.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.005CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Govender, R., & Pratto, F. (1992). The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 893–912.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.6.893CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Barrett, L. F. (2017). The theory of constructed emotion: An active inference account of interoception and categorization. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12, 1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw154CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Barrett, L. F., Mesquita, B., Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2007). The experience of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 373–403.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085709CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Berkman, E. T., Livingston, J. L., & Kahn, L. E. (2017). Finding the “self” in self-regulation: The identity-value model. Psychological Inquiry, 28, 77–98.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2017.1323463CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Berridge, K. C. (2018). Evolving concepts of emotion and motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1647.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01647CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Binder, J. R. (2016). In defense of abstract conceptual representations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1096–1108.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0909-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Binder, J. R., Conant, L. L., Humphries, C. J., Fernandino, L., Simons, S. B., Aguilar, M., & Desai, R. H. (2016). Toward a brain-based componential semantic representation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 33, 130–174.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2016.1147426CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Bogacz, R. (2007). Optimal decision-making theories: Linking neurobiology with behaviour. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 118–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.006CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Braver, T. S. (Ed.). (2016). Motivation and cognitive control. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Burger, J. M., & Cooper, H. M. (1979). The desirability of control. Motivation and Emotion, 3, 381–393.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Carruthers, P. (2018). Valence and value. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 97, 658–680.  https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19–35.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2005). Engagement, disengagement, coping, and catastrophe. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 527–547). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  26. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2011). Self-regulation of action and affect. In K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (2nd ed., pp. 13–39). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  27. Chanes, L., & Barrett, L. F. (2016). Redefining the role of limbic areas in cortical processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 96–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.11.005CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Chang, L. J., & Jolly, E. (2018). Emotions as computational signals of goal error. In A. S. Fox, R. C. Lapate, A. J. Shackman, & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (2nd ed., p. 21). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Cisek, P. (2007). Cortical mechanisms of action selection: The affordance competition hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362, 1585–1599.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Cisek, P. (2012). Making decisions through a distributed consensus. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 22, 927–936.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2012.05.007CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 181–204.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000477CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Cohen, J. D., McClure, S. M., & Yu, A. J. (2007). Should I stay or should I go? How the human brain manages the trade-off between exploitation and exploration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362, 933–942.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Colton, J., Bach, P., Whalley, B., & Mitchell, C. (2018). Intention insertion: Activating an action’s perceptual consequences is sufficient to induce non-willed motor behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147, 1256–1263.  https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Corr, P. J., DeYoung, C. G., & McNaughton, N. (2013). Motivation and personality: A neuropsychological perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 158–175.  https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2013). Evolutionary psychology: New perspectives on cognition and motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 201–229.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131628CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Cunningham, W. A., Zelazo, P. D., Packer, D. J., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2007). The iterative reprocessing model: A multilevel framework for attitudes and evaluation. Social Cognition, 25, 736–760.  https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. D’Mello, S., Lehman, B., Pekrun, R., & Graesser, A. (2014). Confusion can be beneficial for learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 153–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 22–49.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307304092CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. de Lange, F. P., Heilbron, M., & Kok, P. (2018). How do expectations shape perception? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22, 764–779.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.06.002CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Dixon, M. L., Thiruchselvam, R., Todd, R., & Christoff, K. (2017). Emotion and the prefrontal cortex: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 1033–1081.  https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000096CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Duckworth, A. L., Gendler, T. S., & Gross, J. J. (2016). Situational strategies for self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 35–55.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615623247CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Dunning, D. (Ed.). (2011). Social motivation. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  45. Dweck, C. S. (Ed.). (2013). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  46. Dweck, C. S. (2017). From needs to goals and representations: Foundations for a unified theory of motivation, personality, and development. Psychological Review, 124, 689–719.  https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000082CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Ecker, Y., & Gilead, M. (2018). Goal-directed allostasis: The unique challenge of keeping things as they are and strategies to overcome it. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 618–633.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618769847CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Eerola, T. (2016). Expectancy-violation and information-theoretic models of melodic complexity. Empirical Musicology Review, 11, 2–17.  https://doi.org/10.18061/emr.v11i1.4836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Elliot, A. J., & Fryer, J. W. (2008). The goal construct in psychology. In J. Y. Shah & W. L. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  51. Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223–241.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Fishbach, A., Shah, J. Y., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2004). Emotional transfer in goal systems. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 723–738.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Fox, A. S., Lapate, R. C., Shackman, A. J., & Davidson, R. J. (2018). The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Frijda, N. H. (1987). Emotion, cognitive structure, and action tendency. Cognition and Emotion, 1, 115–143.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699938708408043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Frijda, N. H. (2009). Emotion experience and its varieties. Emotion Review, 1, 264–271.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073909103595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 127–138.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2787CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Friston, K., Rigoli, F., Ognibene, D., Mathys, C., Fitzgerald, T., & Pezzulo, G. (2015). Active inference and epistemic value. Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 187–214.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2015.1020053CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Fuster, J. M. (2017). Prefrontal cortex in decision-making: The perception–action cycle. In J.-C. Dreher & L. Tremblay (Eds.), Decision neuroscience (pp. 95–105). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805308-9.00008-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Gable, P., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2010). The motivational dimensional model of affect: Implications for breadth of attention, memory, and cognitive categorisation. Cognition & Emotion, 24, 322–337.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930903378305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Geana, A., Wilson, R. C., Daw, N., & Cohen, J. D. (2016). Boredom, information-seeking and exploration. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1751–1756).Google Scholar
  61. Gershman, S. J. (2018). The successor representation: Its computational logic and neural substrates. Journal of Neuroscience, 38, 7193–7200.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0151-18.2018CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Gershman, S. J. (2019). What does the free energy principle tell us about the brain? ArXiv: 1901.07945 [q-Bio]. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1901.07945
  63. Gibson, J. J. (1954). The visual perception of objective motion and subjective movement. Psychological Review, 61, 304–314.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Gillihan, S. J., & Farah, M. J. (2005). Is self special? A critical review of evidence from experimental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 76–97.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Glimcher, P. W. (2011). Understanding dopamine and reinforcement learning: The dopamine reward prediction error hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 15647–15654.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014269108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2007). The neural basis of decision making. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30, 535–574.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113038CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Gopnik, A., & Schulz, L. (Eds.). (2007). Causal learning. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Grimaldi, P., Lau, H., & Basso, M. A. (2015). There are things that we know that we know, and there are things that we do not know we do not know: Confidence in decision-making. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 55, 88–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.04.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2, 271–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26, 1–26.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Hamilton, A. F., Grafton, S. T., & Hamilton, A. (2007). The motor hierarchy: From kinematics to goals and intentions. In P. Haggard, Y. Rossetti, & M. Kawato (Eds.), Sensorimotor foundations of higher cognition (pp. 381–408). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Harley, J. M., Pekrun, R., Taxer, J. L., & Gross, J. J. (2019). Emotion regulation in achievement situations: An integrated model. Educational Psychologist., 54, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Heckhausen, J. (Ed.). (2000). Motivational psychology of human development: Developing motivation and motivating development. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  74. Henson, R. N., & Gagnepain, P. (2010). Predictive, interactive multiple memory systems. Hippocampus, 20, 1315–1326.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.20857CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Hesslow, G. (2012). The current status of the simulation theory of cognition. Brain Research, 1428, 71–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2011.06.026CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. Huang, Y., & Rao, R. P. N. (2011). Predictive coding. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2, 580–593.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.142CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. Hull, C. L. (1932). The goal-gradient hypothesis and maze learning. Psychological Review, 39, 25–43.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0072640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Hunt, L. T., & Hayden, B. Y. (2017). A distributed, hierarchical and recurrent framework for reward-based choice. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18, 172–182.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage, 14, S103–S109.  https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0832CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  82. Kersten, D., Mamassian, P., & Yuille, A. (2004). Object perception as Bayesian inference. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 271–304.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142005CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  83. Klein, H. J., Wesson, M. J., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Alge, B. J. (1999). Goal commitment and the goal-setting process: Conceptual clarification and empirical synthesis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 885.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.6.885CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  84. Kok, P., & de Lange, F. P. (2015). Predictive coding in sensory cortex. In B. U. Forstmann & E.-J. Wagenmakers (Eds.), An introduction to model-based cognitive neuroscience (pp. 221–244). New York, NY: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2236-9_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Kotabe, H. P., & Hofmann, W. (2015). On integrating the components of self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 618–638.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615593382CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. Kreitler, S. (Ed.). (2013). Cognition and motivation: Forging an interdisciplinary perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Krieglmeyer, R., De Houwer, J., & Deutsch, R. (2013). On the nature of automatically triggered approach–avoidance behavior. Emotion Review, 5, 280–284.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073913477501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Kruglanski, A. W., Shah, J. Y., Fishbach, A., Friedman, R., Chun, W. Y., & Sleeth-Keppler, D. (2002). A theory of goal systems. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 331–378). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  89. Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: “seizing” and “ freezing”. Psychological Review, 103, 263–283.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. Lacey, S., & Lawson, R. (Eds.). (2013). Multisensory imagery. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  91. Lake, B. M., Ullman, T. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Gershman, S. J. (2017). Building machines that learn and think like people. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, E253.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16001837CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  92. Lamme, V. A. F., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2000). The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Neurosciences, 23, 571–579.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01657-XCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  93. Landhäußer, A., & Keller, J. (2012). Flow and its affective, cognitive, and performance-related consequences. In S. Engeser (Ed.), Advances in flow research (pp. 65–85). New York, NY: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2359-1_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Lang, P. J., & Bradley, M. M. (2010). Emotion and the motivational brain. Biological Psychology, 84, 437–450.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.10.007CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  95. Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Coping theory and research: Past, present, and future. Psychosomatic Medicine, 55, 234–247.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  96. Leary, M. R. (2007). Motivational and emotional aspects of the self. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 317–344.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085658CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  97. Lee, D., Seo, H., & Jung, M. W. (2012). Neural basis of reinforcement learning and decision making. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 35, 287–308.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Leotti, L. A., Iyengar, S. S., & Ochsner, K. N. (2010). Born to choose: The origins and value of the need for control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 457–463.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.08.001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  99. Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Louro, M. J., Pieters, R., & Zeelenberg, M. (2007). Dynamics of multiple-goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 174–193.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.174CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  101. Ma, W. J., & Jazayeri, M. (2014). Neural coding of uncertainty and probability. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 37, 205–220.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014017CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  102. Man, V., Nohlen, H. U., Melo, H., & Cunningham, W. A. (2017). Hierarchical brain systems support multiple representations of valence and mixed affect. Emotion Review, 9, 124–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Mann, M., Hosman, C. M. H., Schaalma, H. P., & de Vries, N. K. (2004). Self-esteem in a broad-spectrum approach for mental health promotion. Health Education Research, 19, 357–372.  https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyg041CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  104. Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  105. Maxwell, J. C. (1868). On governors. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 16, 270–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. McAdams, D. P. (2013). The psychological self as actor, agent, and author. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 272–295.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612464657CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  107. McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. (1953). The achievement motive. East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.  https://doi.org/10.1037/11144-000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York, NY: Henry Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Mineka, S., & Hendersen, R. W. (1985). Controllability and predictability in acquired motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 495–529.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  111. Moors, A. (2010). Automatic constructive appraisal as a candidate cause of emotion. Emotion Review, 2, 139–156.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073909351755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Moors, A., Boddez, Y., & De Houwer, J. (2017). The power of goal-directed processes in the causation of emotional and other actions. Emotion Review, 9, 310–318.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916669595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Moors, A., Ellsworth, P. C., Scherer, K. R., & Frijda, N. H. (2013). Appraisal theories of emotion: State of the art and future development. Emotion Review, 5, 119–124.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912468165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Moskowitz, G. B., & Grant, H. (Eds.). (2009). The psychology of goals. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  115. Moulton, S. T., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2009). Imagining predictions: Mental imagery as mental emulation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364, 1273–1280.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Mullally, S. L., & Maguire, E. A. (2014). Memory, imagination, and predicting the future: A common brain mechanism? The Neuroscientist, 20, 220–234.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858413495091CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  117. Mulligan, K., & Scherer, K. R. (2012). Toward a working definition of emotion. Emotion Review, 4, 345–357.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912445818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. O’Doherty, J. P. (2014). The problem with value. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 43, 259–268.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.03.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. O’Leary, D., Uusberg, A., & Gross, J. J. (2017). Identity and self-control: Linking identity-value and process models of self-control. Psychological Inquiry, 28, 132–138.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2017.1337404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. O’Shea, H., & Moran, A. (2017). Does motor simulation theory explain the cognitive mechanisms underlying motor imagery? A critical review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 72.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00072CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  121. Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2014). The neural bases of emotion and emotion regulation: A valuation perspective. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (2nd ed., pp. 23–42). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  122. Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Pellegrini, A. (2009). The role of play in human development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Pessoa, L. (2015). Multiple influences of reward on perception and attention. Visual Cognition, 23, 272–290.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2014.974729CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  125. Pessoa, L. (2018). Emotion and the interactive brain: Insights from comparative neuroanatomy and complex systems. Emotion Review, 10, 204–216.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073918765675CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  126. Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., & DeMarree, K. G. (2007). The meta–cognitive model (MCM) of attitudes: Implications for attitude measurement, change, and strength. Social Cognition, 25, 657–686.  https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Pezzulo, G., & Cisek, P. (2016). Navigating the affordance landscape: Feedback control as a process model of behavior and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 414–424.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.013CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  128. Pezzulo, G., Rigoli, F., & Friston, K. J. (2018). Hierarchical active inference: A theory of motivated control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22, 294–306.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  129. Phaf, H., Mohr, S. E., Rotteveel, M., & Wicherts, J. M. (2014). Approach, avoidance, and affect: A meta-analysis of approach-avoidance tendencies in manual reaction time tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 378.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00378CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  130. Pinker, S. (1999). How the mind works. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 882, 119–127.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08538.xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  131. Pouget, A., Dayan, P., & Zemel, R. (2000). Information processing with population codes. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 1, 125–132.  https://doi.org/10.1038/35039062CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. Pouget, A., Drugowitsch, J., & Kepecs, A. (2016). Confidence and certainty: Distinct probabilistic quantities for different goals. Nature Neuroscience, 19, 366–374.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4240CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  133. Powers, W. T. (1973). Feedback: Beyond behaviorism. Science, 179, 351–356.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.179.4071.351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. Radvansky, G. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2011). Event perception. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2, 608–620.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Rangel, A., Camerer, C., & Montague, P. R. (2008). A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 545–556.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2357CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  136. Ratcliff, R., Smith, P. L., Brown, S. D., & McKoon, G. (2016). Diffusion decision model: Current issues and history. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 260–281.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.007CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  137. Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2014). Neurocognitive mechanisms of perception–action coordination: A review and theoretical integration. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 46, 3–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.05.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Ryan, R. M. (2012). The Oxford handbook of human motivation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Scherer, K., Dan, E., & Flykt, A. (2006). What determines a feeling’s position in affective space? A case for appraisal. Cognition and Emotion, 20, 92–113.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930500305016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Scott, S. H. (2004). Optimal feedback control and the neural basis of volitional motor control. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 532–546.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1427CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. Seth, A. K. (2013). Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 565–573.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.007CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. Seth, A. K. (2015). The cybernetic Bayesian brain: From interoceptive inference to sensorimotor contingencies. In T. Metzinger & J. M. Windt (Eds.), Open MIND. Frankfurt, Germany: MIND Group. Retrieved from http://www.open-mind.net/DOI?isbn=9783958570108Google Scholar
  143. Shadmehr, R., Smith, M. A., & Krakauer, J. W. (2010). Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 33, 89–108.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153135CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  144. Shah, J. Y., Friedman, R., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2002). Forgetting all else: On the antecedents and consequences of goal shielding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1261–1280.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1261CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  145. Shah, J. Y., & Gardner, W. L. (2008). Handbook of motivation science. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  146. Silvia, P. J. (2008). Interest - The curious emotion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 57–60.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00548.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Simon, H. A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106, 467–482.Google Scholar
  148. Simpson, E. H., & Balsam, P. D. (Eds.). (2016). Behavioral neuroscience of motivation. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  149. Skinner, E. A. (1996). A guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 549–570.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  150. Smith, C. A., & Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 7, 233–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Stagner, R. (1977). Homeostasis, discrepancy, dissonance. Motivation and Emotion, 1, 103–138.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Steel, P., & König, C. J. (2006). Integrating theories of motivation. Academy of Management Review, 31, 889–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Sterling, P. (2012). Allostasis: A model of predictive regulation. Physiology & Behavior, 106, 5–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.06.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Stevens, L. E., & Fiske, S. T. (1995). Motivation and cognition in social life: A social survival perspective. Social Cognition, 13, 189–214.  https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1995.13.3.189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Swann, W. B. (1982). The self. Science, 218, 782–782.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.218.4574.782CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  156. Tamir, M. (2015). Why do people regulate their emotions? A taxonomy of motives in emotion regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 199–222.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315586325CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  157. Todorov, E. (2004). Optimality principles in sensorimotor control. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 907–915.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1309CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  158. Tolman, E. C. (1925). Purpose and cognition: The determiners of animal learning. Psychological Review, 32, 285–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Toomela, A. (2016). The ways of scientific anticipation: From guesses to probabilities and from there to certainty. In M. Nadin (Ed.), Anticipation across disciplines (Vol. 29). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22599-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2004). Putting the self into self-conscious emotions: A theoretical model. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 103–125.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1502_01CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Uusberg, A., Taxer, J. L., Yih, J., Uusberg, H., & Gross, J. J. (2019). Reappraising reappraisal. Emotion Review.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073919862617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Van Tongeren, D. R., DeWall, C. N., Green, J. D., Cairo, A. H., Davis, D. E., & Hook, J. N. (2018). Self-regulation facilitates meaning in life. Review of General Psychology, 22, 95–106.  https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Vickery, T. J., Chun, M. M., & Lee, D. (2011). Ubiquity and specificity of reinforcement signals throughout the human brain. Neuron, 72, 166–177.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.08.011CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  164. von Uexküll, J. (1926). Theoretical biology. (D. L. Mackinnon, Trans.). London, England and New York, NY: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co. Ltd. and Harcourt, Brace & Company.Google Scholar
  165. Vuilleumier, P. (2015). Affective and motivational control of vision. Current Opinion in Neurology, 28, 29–35.  https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000159CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  166. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  167. Wessel, J. R., Danielmeier, C., Morton, J. B., & Ullsperger, M. (2012). Surprise and error: Common neuronal architecture for the processing of errors and novelty. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 7528–7537.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6352-11.2012CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  168. Westgate, E. C., & Wilson, T. D. (2018). Boring thoughts and bored minds: The MAC model of boredom and cognitive engagement. Psychological Review, 125, 689–713.  https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000097CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  169. White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297–333.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  170. Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics: Control and communication in the animal and the machine. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  171. Yoo, S. B. M., & Hayden, B. Y. (2018). Economic choice as an untangling of options into actions. Neuron, 99, 434–447.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.06.038CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andero Uusberg
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gaurav Suri
    • 3
  • Carol Dweck
    • 1
  • James J. Gross
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Institute of Psychology, University of TartuTartuEstonia
  3. 3.Department of PsychologySan Francisco State UniversitySan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations