Advertisement

CLIL in Secondary Classrooms: History Contents on the Move

  • Elena del PozoEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

New teaching and learning scenarios like Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) require innovative approaches and studies that highlight the creative nature of CLIL methodology (Llinares, A. (2015). Integration in CLIL: A proposal to inform research and successful pedagogy. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000925) compared to other approaches to content and foreign language teaching and learning (Coyle, Hood, & Marsh, CLIL. Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010). While many studies have focused on language learning outcomes, fewer studies have analyzed the effectiveness of teaching content subjects such as history through English (Coffin, Historical Discourse. London: Continuum, 2006), particularly students’ written production through history projects in secondary schools. This chapter presents a teaching experience which aimed to enhance the learning of history, combining the CLIL approach with project work with secondary students in the Madrid region. The design of projects and activities followed Dalton-Puffer’s cognitive discourse functions (CDF) for conceptualizing content and language in CLIL (Dalton-Puffer, A construct of cognitive discourse functions for conceptualising content-language integration in CLIL and multilingual education. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 1–38, 2013). The chapter concludes that meaningful learning in the history subject happens through language- and content-focused tasks which aim to activate prior knowledge, the development of oral and written competences, and the use of project-based and cooperative learning.

Keywords

History CLIL in secondary education Bilingual Project-based learning Cooperative learning Assessment 

References

  1. Beardsmore, B. H. (2008). Multilingualism, cognition and creativity. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(1), 4–19.Google Scholar
  2. Carretero, M., & Montanero, M. (2008). Enseñanza y aprendizaje de la Historia: aspectos cognitivos y culturales. Cultura y Educación, 20(2), 133–142.  https://doi.org/10.1174/113564008784490361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Champagne, M. (2016). Diagrams of the past: How timelines can aid the growth of historical knowledge. Cognitive Semiotics, 9(1), 11–44.  https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2016-0002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coffin, C. (2006). Historical Discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  5. Cooper, H., & Chapman, A. (Eds.). (2009). Constructing History. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL. Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and Special Education: Issues in Assessment and Pedagogy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  8. Cummins, J. (2017, January 28). Pedagogies of Powerful Communication in CLIL and Bilingual Education. Conference read at the congress ‘Evidence-Based Strategies to Support Bilingual Education in Spain and the US’, University of Salamanca.Google Scholar
  9. Dalton-Puffer, C. (2013). A construct of cognitive discourse functions for conceptualising content-language integration in CLIL and multilingual education. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Darling-Hammond, L., & McCloskey, L. (2008). Assessment for learning around the world. What would it mean to be internationally competitive? Phi Delta Kappan, 90(4), 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. del Pozo, E. (2009). Portfolio: un paso más allá en CLIL. Prácticas en EducaciónBilingüe y Plurilingüe, 1. Castilla y León: Ediciones Prácticas en Educación y Centro de Estudios Hispánicos.Google Scholar
  12. del Pozo, E. (2012). Experiencia pedagógica de la enseñanza de Geografía e Historia en inglés en secundaria. Los proyectos de trabajo en el aula. Madrid: Graó. Retrieved from http://www.grao.com/llibres/nivell-educatiu/ensenanza-reglada/los-proyectos-de-trabajo-en-el-aula
  13. Egea, A., Arias, L., & Casanova, E. (2018). La metodología por proyectos como oportunidad para la introducción de la historia y el patrimonio en las aulas de Educación Infantil. Contextos Educativos, 22, 79–95. Universidad de Murcia.  https://doi.org/10.18172/con.3185
  14. Eleanitz Project. (2010). History 4. Compulsory Secondary Education. Second Cycle. Donostia: IkastolenElkartea.Google Scholar
  15. Flecha, R. (Ed.) (2015). Successful educational actions in/outside the classroom. In Successful Educational Actions for Inclusion and Social Cohesion in Europe (Springer Briefs in Education) (pp. 31–45). Cham: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11176-6_4Google Scholar
  16. Ford, A. (2015). Progression in Historical Thinking. Association of School and College Leaders. Retrieved from https://www.ascl.co.uk/help-and-advice/guidance-paper-progression-and-assessment-in-history.html
  17. Gómez, C. J., & Miralles, P. (2018). Las competencias históricas en perspectiva comparada. Enfoques internacionales sobre su desarrollo y evaluación. Educatio Siglo XXI, 36(1), 11–20. Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia.Google Scholar
  18. Gómez, C. J., & Sáiz, J. (2017). Narrative inquiry and historical skills. A study in teacher training. RevistaElectrónica de InvestigaciónEducativa, 19(4), 19–32.  https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2017.19.4.910Google Scholar
  19. González, I. (1988). Una didáctica de la Historia. Madrid: Ediciones de la Torre.Google Scholar
  20. Kelly, K. (2014). Ingredients for Successful CLIL. British Council-BBC. Retrieved from https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/keith-kelly-ingredients-successful-clil-0
  21. Little, D. (2009). The European Language Portfolio: Where Pedagogy and Assessment Meet. Graz: Council of Europe. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/portfolio/elp-related-publicationsGoogle Scholar
  22. Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R. (2012). The Roles of Language in CLIL. Cambridge: Language Teaching Library.Google Scholar
  23. LOMCE (Spanish Organic Law for the Quality of Education). (2013). Spain: Ministry of Education, Culture, and Sports.Google Scholar
  24. Lorenzo, F. (2017). Historical literacy in bilingual settings: Cognitive academic language in CLIL history narratives. Linguistics and Education, 37, 32–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Luff, I. (2016). Cutting the Gordian Knot: Taking control of assessment. Teaching History, 164, 38–44. London: Historical Association.Google Scholar
  26. Morton, T. (2018). Reconceptualizing and describing teachers’ knowledge of language for content and language integrated learning (CLIL). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(3), 275–286.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1383352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Myskow, G. (2018a). Calibrating the ‘right values’: The role of critical inquiry tasks in social studies textbooks. Visual Communication, 18(1), 1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357218778876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Myskow, G. (2018b). Changes in attitude: Evaluative language in secondary school and university history textbooks. Linguistics and Education, 43, 53–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2017.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pedwell, C., & Perrons, D. (2007). Politics of Democratic Governance. London: LSE Gender Institute.Google Scholar
  30. Pendry, A., Husbands, C., Arthur, J., & Davison, J. (1998). History Teachers in the Making: Professional Learning. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Reierstam, H. (2015). Assessing Language or Content? A Comparative Study of the Assessment Practices in Three Swedish Upper Secondary CLIL Schools. Gothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive (GUPEA), University Publications Electronic Archive (GUPEA). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2077/40701
  32. Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The Language of Schooling. A Functional Linguistic Perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Seixas, P., & Morton, T. (2013). The Big Six Historical Thinking Concepts. Toronto: Nelson.Google Scholar
  34. Tedick, D. J., & Wesely, P. M. (2015). A review of research on content-based foreign/second language education in US K-12 contexts. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 25–40.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. UNDP. (2010). A Guide to UNDP Democratic Governance Practice. UN Development Programme. Retrieved from http://content.undp.org/go/cms-service/download/publication/?version=live&id=2551865
  36. Virta, A. (2001). Student teachers’ conceptions of history. International Journal of Historical Learning, Teaching and Research, 2(1). Retrieved from http://www.ex.ac.uk/historyresource/journal3/journalstart.htmCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations