The Role of eParticipation in the Expansion of Individual Capabilities

  • Marie Anne MacadarEmail author
  • Gabriela Viale Pereira
  • Fernando Bichara Pinto
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11686)


This article seeks to understand how eParticipation can boost individual capabilities in an ICT4D context. The analysis has regard eParticipation as a mechanism for expanding capabilities since it increases the democratic and participatory involvement of individuals in society. To this end, we examined the eParticipation field according to Sæbø et al. [18] and Medaglia [11], combining the capability approach from Sen’s [21] and Nussbaum’s [15] perspectives. Although the literature recognized that the capability approach is particularly difficult to operationalize in practice, we discovered some mechanisms in the eParticipation literature to support our analysis. However, despite its apparent benefits, eParticipation can indirectly contribute toward increasing inequalities among people since it is not available to all. We believe that recognition of the inequalities generated by the digital divide and the subsequent decrease in eParticipation could lead to a better understanding of the ICT4D context and assist in public policy-making.


eParticipation Capability Approach (CA) Information and Communication Technology for Development (ICT4D) 


  1. 1.
    Agrawal, D., Kettinger, W., Zhang, C.: The openness challenge: why some cities take it on and others don’t. In: Proceedings of the 20th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2014), Savannah, Georgia, USA (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Avgerou, C.: Discourses on ICT and development. Inf. Technol. Int. Dev. 6(3), 1–18 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bass, J.M., Nicholson, B., Subrahmanian, E.: A framework using institutional analysis and the capability approach in ICT4D. Inf. Technol. Int. Dev. 9(1), 19–35 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown, A.E., Grant, G.G.: Highlighting the duality of the ICT and development research agenda. Inf. Technol. Dev. 16(2), 96–111 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harrison, T.M., et al.: Open government and e-government: democratic challenges from a public value perspective. Inf. Polity 17(2), 83–97 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heeks, R.: Do information and communication technologies (ICTs) contribute to development? J. Int. Dev. 22(5), 625–640 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heeks, R., Molla, A.: Impact Assessment of ICT-for-development projects: A Compendium of Approaches. Development Informatics Working Paper No. 36, University of Manchester, UK (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Helbig, N., Gil-García, J.R., Ferro, E.: Understanding the complexity of electronic government: implications from the digital divide literature. Gov. Inf. Q. 26(1), 89–97 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kleine, D., Unwin, T.: Technological revolution, evolution and new dependencies: what’s new about ICT4D? Third World Q. 30(5), 1045–1067 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kock, N., Gaskins, L.: The mediating role of voice and accountability in the relationship between internet diffusion and government corruption in Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa. Inf. Technol. Dev. 20(1), 23–43 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Medaglia, R.: eParticipation research: moving characterization forward (2006–2011). Gov. Inf. Q. 29(3), 346–360 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Madon, S.: Evaluating the developmental impact of e-governance initiatives: an exploratory framework. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Countries 20(5), 1–13 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    de Miranda, P.R.M., Cunha, M.A., Pugas-Filho, J.M.: eParticipation in smart cities of developing countries: research-based practical recommendations. In: Gil-Garcia, J.R., Pardo, T.A., Nam, T. (eds.) Smarter as the New Urban Agenda. PAIT, vol. 11, pp. 315–332. Springer, Cham (2016). Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nam, T., Pardo, T.A.: Smart city as urban innovation: focusing on management, policy, and context. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance September, pp. 185–194. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nussbaum, M.C.: Creating Capabilities. The Human Development Approach. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Puri, S.K., Sahay, S.: Role of ICTs in participatory development: an Indian experience. Inf. Technol. Dev. 13(2), 133–160 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Robeyns, I.: The capability approach: a theoretical survey. J. Hum. Dev. 6(1), 93–117 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sæbø, Ø., Rose, J., Flak, L.S.: The shape of eParticipation: characterizing an emerging research area. Gov. Inf. Q. 25(3), 400–428 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sen, A.: Well-being, agency and freedom: the dewey lectures. J. Philos. 82(4), 169–221 (1985)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sen, A.: Development as capability expansion. J. Dev. Plan. 19, 41–58 (1989)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sen, A.: Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Susha, I., Grönlund, Å.: eParticipation research: systematizing the field. Gov. Inf. Q. 29(3), 373–382 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Walsham, G.: Are we making a better world with ICTs? Reflections on a future agenda for the IS field. J. Inf. Technol. 27(2), 87–93 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zheng, Y.: Different spaces for e-development: what can we learn from the capability approach? Inf. Technol. Dev. 15(2), 66–82 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Federal University of Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.Danube University KremsKrems a. d. DonauAustria

Personalised recommendations