Ruptured: Reproductive Loss, Bodily Boundaries, Time and the Life Course in Archaeology

  • Rebecca GowlandEmail author
Part of the Bioarchaeology and Social Theory book series (BST)


The concept of the bounded body is powerfully resonant within the post-industrialised Western world; it is performed and reinforced through cultural practices which observe the maintenance of bodily space and the delineation of individual bodies. Recent research on the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease hypothesis, epigenetics and microchimerism has increasingly exposed the fragility of this construct. As feminist scholars have stated, the pregnant body represents the ultimate boundary transgression: the body within a body. This chapter aims to provide a theoretical exploration of the maternal body, the interconnectedness of mothers and infants in relation to bodily boundaries, and the impact of reproductive loss (miscarriage/neonatal death). Approximately 15–25% of pregnancies end in miscarriage, and infant mortality rates in the past are estimated at 25–30%. Reproductive loss brings violent rupture to a woman’s sense of bodily boundaries, both literally, in that she is unable to contain the foetus, but also because she is required to reconfigure her expected self. Up to 40% of mothers who miscarry suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) 3 months afterwards. This rupture of the infant-mother nexus creates social anxieties concerning the boundedness of both infants and mothers that have hitherto-unexplored repercussions for burial practice and bioarchaeological interpretations.


Miscarriage Funerary practices Stillborn Maternity Foetus Personhood DOHaD Fertility Pollution 


  1. Agarwal, S. C. (2016). Bone morphologies and histories: Life course approaches in bioarchaeology. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 159(S61), 130–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ammon, A., Galindo, C., & Li, D. K. (2012). A systematic review to calculate background miscarriage rates using life table analysis. Birth Defects Research Part A Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 94(6), 417–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Astuti, R. (1998). “It's a boy,” “It's a girl!”: Reflections on sex and gender in Madagascar and beyond. In M. Lambert & A. Strathern (Eds.), Bodies and persons. Comparative perspectives from Africa and Melanesia (pp. 29–52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barker, D. J. P. (2012). Developmental origins of chronic disease. Public Health, 126(3), 185–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barker, D. J. P., Eriksson, J. G., Forsén, T., & Osmond, C. (2002). Fetal origins of adult disease: Strength of effects and biological basis. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31(6), 1235–1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bauchner, H., & Vinci, R. (2001). What have we learnt from the Alder Hey affair? BMJ, 322, 309–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benthien, C. (2002). Skin. On the cultural border between self and the world. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Boeyens, J., van der Ryst, M., & Coetzee, F. (2009). From uterus to jar: The significance of an infant pot burial from Melora Saddle, an early nineteenth-century African farmer site on the Waterberg Plateau. Southern African Humanities, 21, 213–238.Google Scholar
  9. Brereton, G. (2013). Cultures of infancy and capital accumulation in pre-urban Mesopotamia. World Archaeology, 45, 232–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cannon, A., & Cook, K. (2015). Infant death and the archaeology of grief. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 29(2), 399–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carroll, M. (2011). Infant death and burial in Roman Italy. Journal of Roman Archaeology, 24, 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carroll, M. (2018). Infancy and earliest childhood in the Roman world. A fragment of time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cecil, R. (1996). The anthropology of pregnancy loss: Comparative studies in miscarriage, stillbirth and neonatal death. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  14. Chapman, J. (2010). “Deviant” burials in the neolithic and chalcolithic of Central and South Eastern Europe. In K. Rebay-Salisbury, M. L. Stig Sorensen, & J. Hughes (Eds.), Body parts and body wholes (pp. 30–45). Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
  15. Chávez, A., Martinez, C., & Soberanes, B. (2000). The effect of malnutrition on human development: A 24-year study of well-nourished and malnourished children living in a poor Mexican village. In A. H. Goodman, D. L. Dufour, & G. H. Pelto (Eds.), Nutritional anthropology: Biocultural perspectives on food and nutrition (pp. 234–252). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Chung, G. C., & Kuzawa, C. W. (2014). Intergenerational effects of early life nutrition: Maternal leg length predicts offspring placental weight and birth weight among women in rural Luzon, Philippines. American Journal of Human Biology, 26(5), 652–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cocks, A. H. (1921). A Romano-British homestead in the Hambleden Valley. Archaeologia, 71, 141–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Conkey, M. W., & Spector, J. (1984). Archaeology and the study of gender. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 7, 1–29.Google Scholar
  19. Craven, C., & Peel, E. (2017). Queering reproductive loss: Exploring grief and memorialization. In E. R. M. Lind & A. Deveau (Eds.), Interrogating pregnancy loss: Feminist writings on abortion, miscarriage and stillbirth (pp. 225–245). Bradford: Demeter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cressy, D. (2010). Birth, Marriage & Death. In Ritual religion, and the life-cycle in Tudor and Stuart England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Damm, C. (1986). An appeal for women in archaeology. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 5(2), 215–218.Google Scholar
  22. Dasen, V. (2011). Childbirth and infancy in Greek and Roman antiquity. In B. Rawson (Ed.), Companion to families in the Greek and Roman worlds (pp. 291–314). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Davey Smith, G. (2011). Epidemiology, epigenetics and the ‘gloomy prospect’: Embracing randomness in population health research and practice. International Journal of Epidemiology, 40(3), 537–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dewar, S., & Boddington, P. (2004). Returning to the Alder Hey report and its reporting: Addressing confusions and improving inquiries. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30(5), 463–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger. An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. DiCaglio, S. (2017). Staging embryos: Pregnancy, temporality and the history of the Carnegie stages of embryo development. Body and Society, 23(2), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Farren, J., Jalmbrant, M., & Ameye, L. (2016). Post-traumatic stress, anxiety and depression following miscarriage or ectopic pregnancy: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open, 6(11), e011864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Finlay, N. (2013). Archaeologies of the beginnings of life. World Archaeology, 45(2), 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Frost, J., Bradle, H., Levitas, R., Smith, L., & Garcia, J. (2007). The loss of possibility: Scientisation of death and the special case of early miscarriage. Sociology of Health & Illness, 29(7), 1003–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fowler, C. (2001). Personhood and social relations in the British Neolithic with a Study from the Isle of Man. Journal of Material Culture, 6(2), 137–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Geller, P. (2017). The bioarchaeology of socio-sexual lives: Queering common sense about sex, gender and sexuality. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gero, J. M. (1985). Socio-politics and the woman at home ideology. American Antiquity, 50(2), 342–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gilmore, H. F., & Halcrow, S. E. (2014). Sense or sensationalism? Approaches to explaining high perinatal mortality in the past. In J. L. Thompson, M. P. Alfonso-Durruty, & J. J. Crandal (Eds.), Tracing childhood: Bioarchaeological investigations of early lives in antiquity (pp. 123–138). Gainsville: Florida University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Graham, E. J. (2013). The making of infants in Hellenistic and early Roman Italy: A votive perspective. World Archaeology, 45(2), 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gilchrist, R. (2012). Medieval life: Archaeology and the life course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Giuffra, V., Vitiello, A., Caramella, D., Fornaciari, A., Giustini, D., & Fornaciari, G. (2013). Rickets in a high social class of renaissance Italy: The Medici children. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 25(5), 608–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gottlieb, A. (2000). ‘Where have all the babies gone?’ Toward an anthropology of infants (and their caretakers). Anthropological Quarterly, 73(3), 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gottlieb, A. (2004). The afterlife is where we come from. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  39. Gowland, R. L. (2015). Entangled lives: Implications of the developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD) hypothesis for bioarcheology and the life course. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 158(4), 530–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gowland, R. L. (2018). Infants and mothers: Linked lives, embodied life courses. In C. Crawford, D. Hadley, & G. Shepherd (Eds.), Oxford handbook of childhood in archaeology (pp. 104–122). Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
  41. Gowland, R. L., & Chamberlain, A. T. (2002). A Bayesian approach to ageing perinatal skeletal material from archaeological sites: Implications for the evidence for infanticide in Roman-Britain. Journal of Archaeological Science, 29(6), 677–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gowland, R. L., Chamberlain, A. T., & Redfern, R. C. (2014). On the brink of being: Re-evaluating infant death and infanticide in Roman Britain. In M. Carroll & E. J. Graham (Eds.), Infant Health and Death in Roman Italy and Beyond (pp. 69–88). Journal of Roman archaeology supplementary series 98). Portsmouth: Journal of Roman Archaeology.Google Scholar
  43. Gowland, R., & Penny-Mason, B. J. (2018). Overview: Archaeology and the medieval life course. In C. Gerrard & A. Gutierrez (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of later medieval archaeology (pp. 759–773). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Gowland, R., & Thompson, T. J. U. (2013). Human identity and identification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Halcrow, S., Tayles, N., & Elliott, G. E. (2018). The bioarcheology of foetuses. In S. Han, T. K. Betsinger, & A. B. Scott (Eds.), The anthropology of the fetus. Biology, culture and society (pp. 88–111). New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  46. Hallam, E., Hockey, J., & Howarth, G. (1999). Beyond the body: Death and social identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Han, S., Betsinger, T., & Scott, A. B. (2018). Conceiving the anthropology of the fetus. In S. Han, T. Betzinger, & A. B. Scott (Eds.), The anthropology of the fetus. Biology, culture and society. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  48. Hausman, B. (2017). Topographies of the afterlife: Reconsidering infant burials in medieval mortuary space. Journal of Social Archaeology, 17(2), 210–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hockey, J., & Draper, J. (2005). Beyond the womb and the tomb: Identity, (dis)embodiment and the life course. Body and Society, 11(2), 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kaufman, S. R., & Morgan, L. M. (2005). The anthropology of the beginnings and ends of life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 317–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kristeva, K. (1982). Powers of horror: An essay on abjection. Translated by Leon S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Landecker, H., & Panofsky, A. (2013). From social structure to gene regulation, and back: A critical introduction to environmental epigenetics for sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 333–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Layne, L. (2000). ‘He was a real baby, with baby things’: A material cultural analysis of personhood, parenthood and pregnancy loss. Journal of Material Culture, 5(3), 321–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Layne, L. (2003). Motherhood lost: The cultural construction of miscarriage and stillbirth in America. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Longhurst, R. (2001). Bodies: Exploring fluid boundaries. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Longhurst, R. (2008). Maternities: Gender, bodies and space. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Lupton, A. (2013). The social worlds of the unborn. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Jones, L. S. (2001). Hope deferred: Theological reflections on reproductive loss (infertility, miscarriage, stillbirth). Modern Theology, 17(2), 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McDowell, L. (1993). Space, place and gender relations: Part II identity, difference, feminist geometries and geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 17(3), 305–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Martin, A. (2010). Microchimerism in the mother(land): Blurring the Borders of body and nation. Body and Society, 16(3), 23–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mays, S. (1993). Infanticide in Roman Britain. Antiquity, 67(257), 883–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mays, S., & Eyers, J. (2011). Perinatal infant death at the Roman Villa Site at Hambleden, Buckinghamshire, England. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(8), 1931–1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Millett, M., & Gowland, R. (2015). Infant and child burial rites in Roman Britain: A study from East Yorkshire. Britannia, 46, 171–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Moore, A. (2009). Hearth and home: The burial of infants within Romano-British domestic contexts. Childhood in the Past, 2(1), 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Murphy, E. (2011). Children’s burial grounds in Ireland (cίllini) and parental emotions toward infant death. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 15(3), 409–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Neugeboren, J. (1976). An Orphan’s tale. Rinehart and Winston: Holt.Google Scholar
  67. Ohinata, F., & Steyn, M. (2001). Report on human skeletal remains from a Later Iron Age site at Simunye (Swaziland). The South African Archaeological Bulletin, 56(173/174), 57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Orme, N. (2001). Medieval children. Yale: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Parkin, T. (1992). Demography and roman society. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Rapp, R. (2018). How/shall we consider the fetus? In S. Han, T. Betzinger, & A. B. Scott (Eds.), The anthropology of the fetus. Biology, culture and society (pp. xii–xiv). New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  71. Richardson, S. S. (2015). Maternal bodies in the postgenomic order: Gender and the explanatory landscape of epigenetics. In S. Richardson & H. Stevens (Eds.), Postgenomics: Perspectives on biology after the genome (pp. 210–231). Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Richardson, S. S., Daniels, C. R., Gillman, M. W., Golden, J., Kukla, R., Kuzawa, C., & Rich-Edwards, J. (2014). Society: don’t blame the mothers. Nature News. 13 Aug 2014.Google Scholar
  73. Riddle, J. (1994). Contraception and abortion from the ancient world to the renaissance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Rutherford, J. (2018). The borderless fetus. Temporal complexity of the lived fetal experience. In S. Han, T. Betzinger, & A. B. Scott (Eds.), The anthropology of the fetus. Biology, culture and society (pp. 15–33). New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  75. Salmon, A. (2004). ‘It takes a community’: Constructing aboriginal mothers and children with FAS/FAE as objects of moral panic in/through a FAS/FAE prevention policy. Journal of the Association for Research on Mothering, 6(1), 112–123.Google Scholar
  76. Salmon, A. (2011). Aboriginal mothering, FASD prevention and the contestations of neoliberal citizenship. Critical Public Health, 21(2), 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Scott, E. (1991). Animal and infant burials in Romano-British villas: A revitalization movement. In P. Garwood, D. Jennings, R. Skeates, & J. Toms (Eds.), Sacred and Profane: Proceedings of a Conference on Archaeology, Ritual and Religion (pp. 115–121). Oxford University Committee for Archaeology Monograph 32). Oxford: Oxford University Committee for Archaeology.Google Scholar
  78. Scott, E. (1999). The Archaeology of Infancy and Infant Death. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, International Series 819.Google Scholar
  79. Shildrick, M. (1997). Leaky bodies and boundaries: Feminism, postmodernism and bio(ethics). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  80. Shildrick, M., & Price, J. (1999). Openings on the body: A critical introduction. In J. Price & M. Schildrick (Eds.), Feminist theory and the body (pp. 1–14). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Shilling, C. (1993). Body and social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Standen, V. G., Arriaza, B. T., & Santoro, C. (2014). Chinchorro mortuary practices on infants: Northern Chile (archaic period BP 7000-3600). In J. L. Thompson, M. P. Alfonso-Durruty, J. J. Crandall, & J.J. (Eds.), Tracing childhood: Bioarchaeological investigations of early lives in antiquity (pp. 58–74). Gainsville: University of Florida Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Strathern, M. (1988). The gender of the gift: Problems with women and problems with society in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stevens, S. T. (2013). Stages of infancy in Roman amphora burial. In J. Evans Grubb & T. Parkin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of childhood and education in the classical world (pp. 625–643). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Temkin, O. (1991). Soranus’ gynecology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  86. University of Cambridge Research News. (2016). Youngest Ancient Egyptian human foetus discovered in miniature coffin at the Fitzwilliam Museum. 12 May 2016. Accessed 3 Jan 2019.
  87. Waterland, R. A., Kellermayer, R., Laritsky, E., Rayco-Solon, P., Harris, R. A., Travisano, M., Zhang, W., Torskaya, M. S., Zhang, J., Shen, L., Manary, M. J., & Prentice, A. M. (2010). Season of conception in rural Gambia affects DNA methylation at putative metastable epialleles. PLoS Genetics, 6(12), e1001252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Waterland, R. A., & Michels, K. B. (2007). Epigenetic epidemiology of the developmental origins hypothesis. Annual Review of Nutrition, 27(1), 363–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Whitehouse, R. (2007). Gender archaeology in Europe. In S. Milledge Nelson (Ed.), Worlds of gender: The archaeology of Women’s lives around the globe (pp. 139–190). Lanham: Alta Mira Press.Google Scholar
  90. Youngs, D. (2010). Life cycle. In L. J. Wilkinson (Ed.), A cultural history of childhood and family in the middle ages (pp. 109–126). London: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ArchaeologyDurham UniversityDurhamUK

Personalised recommendations