Advertisement

Placebo Research and Clinical Practice

  • Pekka LouhialaEmail author
Chapter
  • 4 Downloads
Part of the The International Library of Bioethics book series (ILB)

Abstract

Placebos–understood as inert substances–were introduced in the late 1940’s as an important tool in clinical research. From the beginning, placebo effect has had two meanings: the changes in the placebo group in research and the changes in an individual patient in clinical care. These two situations are fundamentally different, since the aim of research is to find out whether a new method works and the aim of clinical medicine is to help the individual patient. For reasons presented in Chap.  2, ‘placebo effect’ is a confusing label to describe the changes in a patient in clinical care.

References

  1. Annoni, M., and F.G. Miller. 2016. Placebo effects and the ethics of therapeutic communication: A pragmatic perspective. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 26: 79–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold, M.H., D.G. Finniss, and I. Kerridge. 2015. Destigmatising the placebo effect. American Journal of Bioethics 15 (10): 21–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balint, M. 1955. The doctor, his patient, and the illness. Lancet 268: 683–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrett, B., D. Muller, D. Rakel, D. Rabago, L. Marchand, and J.C. Scheder. 2006. Placebo, meaning and health. Perspectives of Biology and Medicine 49: 178–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartley, H., K. Faasse, R. Horne, and K.J. Petrie. 2016. You can’t always get what you want: The influence of choice on nocebo and placebo responding. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 50: 445–451.Google Scholar
  6. Bingel, U., V. Wanigasekera, K. Wiech, R. Ni Mhuircheartaigh, M.C. Lee, M. Ploner, et al. 2011. The effect of treatment expectation on drug efficacy: Imaging the analgesic benefit of the opioid remifentanil. Science Translational Medicine 3: 70ra14.Google Scholar
  7. Blasini, M., N. Peiris, T. Wright, et al. 2018. The role of patient–practitioner relationships in placebo and nocebo phenomena. International Review of Neurobiology 139: 211–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brien, S., L. Lachance, P. Prescott, et al. 2011. Homeopathy has clinical benefits in rheumatoid arthritis patients that are attributable to the consultation process but not the homeopathic remedy: A randomized controlled trial. Rheumatology 50: 1070–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, X., K. Zou, N. Abdullah, N. Whiteside, A. Sarmanova, M. Doherty, and W. Zhang. 2017. The placebo effect and its determinants in fibromyalgia: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Clinical Rheumatology 36: 1623–1630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crum, A., and B. Zuckerman. 2017. Changing mindsets to enhance treatment effectiveness. JAMA 317: 2063–2064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cuijpers, P., and I.A. Cristea. 2015. What if a placebo effect explained all the activity of depression treatments? World Psychiatry 14: 310–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Di Blasi, Z., E. Harkness, E.W. Ernst, A. Georgiou, and J. Kleijnen. 2001. Influence of context effects on health outcomes: A systematic review. Lancet 357: 757–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Egbert, L.D., G.E. Battit, C.E. Welch, and M.K. Bartlett. 1964. Reduction of postoperative pain by encouragement and instruction of patients. New England Journal of Medicine 270(16): 825–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ernst, E. 2011. Homeopathy, non-specific effects and good medicine have we lost core medical values? Rheumatology 50: 1007–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Faria, V., C. Linnman, A. Lebel, and D. Borsook. 2014. Harnessing the placebo effect in pediatric migraine clinic. Journal of Pediatrics 165: 659–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feinstein, A.R. 2002. Post-therapeutic response and therapeutic ‘Style’: Re-formulating the ‘Placebo Effect’. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 55: 427–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geers, A.L., J.P. Rose, S.L. Fowler, H.M. Rasinski, J.A. Brown, and S.G. Helfer. 2013. Why does choice enhance treatment effectiveness? Using placebo treatments to demonstrate the role of personal control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 105: 549–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heath, I. 2018. Back to the future: Aspects of the NHS that should never change. BMJ 362: k3187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaptchuk, T.J., J.M. Kelley, L.A. Conboy, R.B. Davis, C.E. Kerr, E.E. Jacobson, et al. 2008. Components of placebo effect: randomised controlled trial in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. BMJ 336(7651): 999–1003.Google Scholar
  20. Krupnick, J.L., S.M. Sotsky, S. Simmens, J. Moyer, I. Elkin, J. Watkins, et al. 1996. The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy outcome: Findings in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaboration Research Program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 64 (3): 532–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lucassen, P., and F. Olesen. 2016. Context as a drug: Some consequences of placebo research for primary care. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 34: 428–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meissner, K., N. Kohls, and L. Colloca. 2011. Introduction to placebo effects in medicine: Mechanisms and clinical implications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 366: 1783–1789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Miller, F.G., and T.J. Kaptchuk. 2008. The power of context: Reconceptualizing the placebo effect. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 101: 222–225.Google Scholar
  24. O’Connor, A.M., R.A. Pennie, and R.E. Dales. 1996. Framing effects on expectations, decisions, and side effects experienced: The case of influenza immunization. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 49: 1271–1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rakel, D.P., T.J. Hoeft, B.P. Barrett, B.A. Chewning, B.M. Craig, and M. Niu. 2009. Practitioner empathy and the duration of the common cold. Family Medicine 41: 494–501.Google Scholar
  26. Rossettini, G., E. Carlino, and M. Testa. 2018. Clinical relevance of contextual factors as triggers of placebo and nocebo effects in musculoskeletal pain. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 19: 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stewart, M.A. 1995. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: A review. Canadian Medical Association Journal 152: 1423–1433.Google Scholar
  28. Thomas, K.B. 1987. General practice consultations: Is there any point in being positive? BMJ 294: 1200–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Verheul, W., A. Sanders, and J. Bensing. 2010. The effects of physicians’ affect-oriented communication style and raising expectations on analogue patients’ anxiety, affect and expectancies. Patient Education and Counseling 80: 300–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Weiland, A. 2012. Encounters between medical specialists and patients with medically unexplained physical symptoms; influences of communication on patient outcomes and use of health care: A literature overview. Perspectives on Medical Education 1: 192–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.University of TampereTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations