Advertisement

Care

  • Nik Kinley
  • Shlomo Ben-Hur
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, the authors introduce the first component of trust in their Leadership OS model—care. Using both their own and previous research, they describe the neural and social underpinnings of care and the functions it plays in a leaders’ Operating System—how it affects people’s performance. They introduce a case study (Herb Kelleher at Southwest Airlines) showing the role and importance of care in a leaders’ OS. They then describe practical techniques leaders can use to increase the degree to which their OS enables and supports care. Finally, they introduce a checklist leaders can use to test the extent people experience care in their OS.

References

  1. 1.
    N. Semmer, A. Elfering, N. Jacobshagen, T. Perrot, T. Beehr and N. Boos, “The emotional meaning of instrumental social support,” International Journal of Stress Management, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 235–251, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. Tardy, “Counteracting task-induced stress: Studies of instrumental and emotional support in problem-solving contexts,” in B. R. Burleson, T. L. Albrecht and I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1994, pp. 71–87.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Fu, “Chinese leadership and culture,” in R. J. House and J. Chhokar (Eds.), Cultures of the world, A GLOBE anthology of in-depth descriptions of the cultures of 14 countries, New York, NY, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2008, pp. 877–908.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Greguras and J. Ford, “An examination of the multidimensionality of supervisor and subordinate perceptions of leader–member exchange,” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, vol. 79, pp. 433–465, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. Stinglhamber and C. Vandenberghe, “Organizations and supervisors as sources of support and targets of commitment: A longitudinal study,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 251–270, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. Arshadi, “The relationships of perceived organizational support (POS) with organizational commitment, in-role performance, and turnover intention: Mediating role of felt obligation,” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 30, pp. 1103–1108, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Eisenberger and F. Stinglhamber, Perceived organizational support: Fostering enthusiastic and productive employees, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2011.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. Madjar, G. Oldham and M. Pratt, “There’s no place like home? The contributions of work and nonwork creativity support to employees’ creative performance,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 757–767, 2002.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. Telle and H. Pfister, “Positive empathy and prosocial behavior: A neglected link,” Emotion Review, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 154–163, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Sulea, D. Virga, L. Maricutoiu, W. Schaufeli, C. Zaborila Dumitru and F. Sava, “Work engagement as mediator between job characteristics and positive and negative extra-role behaviors,” Career Development International, vol. 17, pp. 188–207, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Xu and H. Cooper-Thomas, “How can leaders achieve high employee engagement?,” Leadership and Organization Development Journal, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 399–416, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Sharifirad, “Can incivility impair team’s creative performance through paralyzing employee’s knowledge sharing? A multi-level approach,” Leadership & Organization Development Journal, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 200–225, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Decety and C. Lamm, “Human empathy through the lens of social neuroscience,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 6, pp. 1146–1163, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Decety, “The neural pathways, development and functions of empathy,” Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, vol. 3, pp. 1–6, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Heinrichs, T. Baumgartner, C. Kirschbaum and U. Ehlert, “Social support and oxytocin interact to suppress cortisol and subjective responses to psychosocial stress,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 1389–1398, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    C. Hartley and E. Phelps, “Anxiety and decision-making,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 113–118, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. Sherman, J. Lerner, R. Josephs, J. Renshon and J. Gross, “The interaction of testosterone and cortisol is associated with attained status in male executives,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 110, no. 6, pp. 921–929, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    P. Zak, “The Neuroscience of Trust,” Harvard Business Review, January–February, pp. 84–90, 2017.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    D. Bhanthumnavin, “Perceived social support from supervisor and group members’ psychological and situational characteristics as predictors of subordinate performance in Thai work units,” Human Resource Development Quarterly, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 79–97, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. Harter, F. Schmidt and C. Keyes, “Well-being in the workplace and its relationship to business outcomes,” in C. L. Keyes and J. Haidt (Eds.), Flourishing: The positive person and the good life as well as well-being in the workplace and its relationship to business outcomes: A review of the gallup studies, Washington, DC, American Psychological Association, 2003, pp. 205–224.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. Pazy and Y. Ganzach, “Pay contingency and the effects of perceived organizational and supervisor support on performance and commitment,” Journal of Management, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1007–1025, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Griffin, M. Patterson and M. West, “Job satisfaction and teamwork: The role of supervisor support,” Journal of Organisational Behaviour, vol. 22, pp. 537–550, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. Eisenberger, P. Fasolo and V. Davis-LaMastro, “Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 75, no. 1, p. 51, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    S. Kirmeyer and T. Dougherty, “Work load, tension, and coping: Moderating effects of supervisor support,” Personnel Psychology, vol. 41, pp. 125–139, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    G. Prati and L. Pietrantoni, “The relation of perceived and received social support to mental health among first responders: A meta‐analytic review,” Journal of Community Psychology, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 403–417, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    P. Brough and J. Pears, “Evaluating the influence of the type of social support on job satisfaction and work related psychological well-being,” International Journal of Organisational Behaviour, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 472–485, 2004.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    R. Eisenberger, F. Stinglhamber, C. Vandenberghe, I. Sucharski and L. Rhoades, “Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 565–573, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    I. Onyishi and E. Ogbodo, “The contributions of self-efficacy and perceived organisational support when taking charge at work,” SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2012.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    H. Vinarski-Peretz and A. Carmeli, “Linking care felt to engagement in innovative behaviors in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological conditions,” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 43, 2011.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    L. Zampetakis, P. Beldekos and V. Moustakis, “‘Day-to-day’ entrepreneurship within organisations: The role of trait emotional intelligence and perceived organisational support,” European Management Journal, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 165–175, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    T. Ng and K. Sorensen, “Toward a further understanding of the relationships between perceptions of support and work attitudes: A meta-analysis,” Group & Organization Management, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 243–268, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    L. Shanock and R. Eisenberger, “When supervisors feel supported: Relationships with subordinates’ perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and performance,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 91, no. 3, p. 689, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    C. O’Donnell, H. Jabareen and G. Watt, “Practice nurses’ workload, career intentions and the impact of professional isolation: A cross-sectional survey,” BMC Nursing, vol. 9, no. 2, 2010.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    C. Duhigg, “What Google learned from its quest to build the perfect team,” The New York Times, 25 February 2016.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    K. Illes and M. Mathews, Leadership, trust and communication: Building trust in companies through effective leadership communication, London, UK: Westminster Business School, 2015.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nik Kinley
    • 1
  • Shlomo Ben-Hur
    • 2
  1. 1.WokingUK
  2. 2.LausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations