Violence and Meaning pp 41-58 | Cite as
The Temporality of Violence: Destruction, Dissolution and the Construction of Sense
Abstract
Violence tends to the destruction of meaningful entities and of that through which such entities are meaningful. Not all violence is annihilating in its effects, but violence aims towards a nothingness which discloses a certain fragility of meaning. The obliteration of the singular, the reduction of organic and structural unity to charred flesh and rubble, is not simply an event within a world, but an event that threatens worldly sense. The constitution of such worldly sense is dependent on time, on the interweaving of temporal tendencies, or orientations, in Husserlian terms: retention and protention. But this interweaving of temporal orientations requires a minimal order of continuity whereby retention, both near and far, and near and far protention allow for a sense of temporal stretch which has a unity and a sense. This is true even though every now may be new, temporal relations being of self-differentiation. Annihilating violence—whether of the individual raped and tortured or the community left bereft through war, colonization or natural disaster—has a traumatizing effect which results in a disconnection from the past and derealization of that which profoundly modifies the retentional and protentional orientations. The vulnerability of temporal constitution, which violence discloses, reveals a fundamental absence at the core of time itself and a nothingness threatening the stability of normalized meaningful entities and spaces while revealing a groundless space of the emergence of meaning.
Bibliography
- Amery, J. (2009). At the Mind’s Limits: Contemplations by a Survivor on Auschwitz and Its Realities. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Arendt, H. (1970). On Violence. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
- Aristotle. (1984). The Physics. In J. Barnes (Ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Barthes, R. (2002). A Lover’s Discourse: Fragments. London: Vintage Classics.Google Scholar
- Benjamin, W. (1968). Theses on the Philosophy of History. In H. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations (pp. 253–265). New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
- Benjamin, W. (1986). The Critique of Violence. In Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings (E. Jephcott, Trans.) (pp. 277–300). New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
- Bergson, H. (1991). Matter and Memory (N. M. Paul & W. S. Palmer, Trans.). New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
- Blanchot, M. (2015). The Writing the Disaster (A. Smock, Trans.). London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
- Brison, S. (2011). Aftermath: Violence and the Remaking of the Self. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Caruth, C. (1996). Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative, and History. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
- Cavarero, A. (2009). Horrorism: Naming Contemporary Violence (W. McCuaig, Trans.) New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Dastur, F. (2000). Phenomenology of the Event: Waiting and Surprise. Hypatia, 15(4), 178–189.Google Scholar
- Derrida, J. (1992). The Force of Law: The “Mystical Foundations of Authority”. In D. Connell, M. Rosenfeld, & D. Carlson (Eds.), Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice (pp. 3–67). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Husserl, E. (2001). In R. Bernet & D. Lohmar (Eds.), Die Bernauer Manuskripte über das Zeitbewusstsein (1917/18). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority (A. Lingis, Trans.). Pittsburg: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
- Merleau-Ponty, M. (1965). The Structure of Behavior. London: Metheun.Google Scholar
- Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The Visible and the invisible (A. Lingis, Trans.). Pittsburg: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
- Merleau-Ponty, M. (2013). The Phenomenology of Perception (D. Landes, Trans.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Ó Murchadha, F. (2002). Being and Ruination. Simmel and Heidegger on the Phenomenology of Ruins. Philosophy Today, 46(SPEP Supplement), 10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ó Murchadha, F. (2017). Speaking After the Phenomenon: The Promise of Things and the Future of Phenomenology. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 48(1), 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Plato. (1961a). Parmenides. In E. Hamilton & H. Cairns (Eds.), The Complete Dialogues of Plato. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Plato. (1961b). Timaeus. In E. Hamilton & H. Cairns (Eds.), The Complete Dialogues of Plato. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Ratcliffe, M. (2017). Grief and the Unity of Emotions. Mid-West Studies in Philosophy, XLI, 154–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ravaisson, F. (2009) Of Habit (C. Carlisle & M. Sinclaire, Trans.). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Ricoeur, P. (1994). Time and Narrative vol. 1 (K. McLaughlin, Trans.) Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
- Simmel, G. (1996). “Die Ruine” in Philosophische Kultur. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
- Staudigl, M. (2015). Phänomenologie der Gewalt. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tengelyi, L. (2004). The Wild Region in Life-History. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar