Advertisement

The Effect of High-Speed Milling on Surface Roughness of 42CrMo4 Hardened Steel Using a Ball Nose End-Mill Cutter

  • Sai LotfiEmail author
  • Belguith Rami
  • Baili Maher
  • Dessein Gilles
  • Bouzid Wassila
Conference paper
  • 69 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The surface roughness is a decisive criterion for the quality of the machined surface. Many researchers are interested to study the effects of the machining parameters on the surface quality as: the cutting conditions, the machining strategies, the tool geometries and the machining errors. All these studies are developed for the stationary feed rate and neglected the cinematic effects caused by machine deceleration and acceleration when the tool trajectories change a direction. The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the velocity changes on the surface roughness. A set of machining tests in high-speed end-milling of the 42CrMo4 material by a ball nose end-mill is made. For the same cutting conditions, the roughness is measured on three zones respectively the acceleration, the stationary and the deceleration zone. It was seen that the cinematic change causes a poor surface roughness.

Keywords

Roughness High-speed milling 42CrMo4 Acceleration and deceleration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work is carried out thanks to the support and funding allocated to the Unit of Mechanical and Materials Production Engineering (UGPM2/UR17ES43) by the Tunisian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research.

References

  1. 1.
    Mersni W, boujelbene M, ben Salem S, Alghamdi A-S (2018) Optimization of the surface roughness in ball end milling of titanium alloy Ti–6Al–4 V using the Taguchi method. Proc Manuf 20: 271–276Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bouzid W, Zghal A, Sai L (2004) Taguchi method for design optimization of milled surface roughness. Mater Technol 19–3:159–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sekulic Pejic M, Brezocnik V, Gostimirović M, Hadzistevic M (2018) Prediction of surface roughness in the ball-end milling process using response surface methodology, genetic algorithms, and grey wolf optimizer algorithms. Adv Prod Eng Manag 13–1:18–30Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wojciechowski S, Twardowski P, Chwalczuk T (2013) Surface roughness of hardened steel after ball end milling with various surface inclinations. Arch Mech Technol Autom 33–1:55–64Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hossain MSJ, Nafis A (2012) Surface roughness prediction modeling for AISI 4340 after ball end mill operation using artificial intelligence. I J Sci Eng Res 3–5:1–10Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dikshit MK, Puri AB, Maity A (2016) Optimization of surface roughness in ball-end milling using teaching-learning-based optimization and response surface methodology. J Eng Manuf 1–12Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jatti VS, Sekhar R, Patil RK (2013) Study of ball nose end milling of LM6 Al Alloy: surface roughness optimization using genetic algorithm. I J Eng Tech 5–3:2859–2865Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kurt M, Hartomacýoðlu S, Mutlu B, Köklü U (2012) Minimization of the surface roughness and form error on the milling of free-form surfaces using a grey relational analysis. Mater Technol 46–3:205–213Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Quintana G, Ciurana J, Ribatallada J (2010) Surface roughness generation and material removal rate in ball end milling operations. Mater Manuf Process 25–6:386–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vishal KM, Pankaj K, Baljeet S (2014) A review of optimization of surface roughness of Inconel 718 in end milling using Taguchi method. J Eng Res Appl 4–12:103–109Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chuan S, Peiqing Y (2011) The look-ahead function-based interpolation algorithm for continuous micro-line trajectories. I J Adv Manuf Technol 54:649–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sai Lotfi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Belguith Rami
    • 1
    • 2
  • Baili Maher
    • 2
  • Dessein Gilles
    • 2
  • Bouzid Wassila
    • 1
  1. 1.Unité de Génie de Production Mécanique et Matériaux, ENISSfaxTunisie
  2. 2.Laboratoire Génie de ProductionUniversité de Toulouse; INPT/ENITTarbes CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations