Advertisement

Well-being in Europe

  • Annie AustinEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Wellbeing in Politics and Policy book series (WPP)

Abstract

Well-being happens, or doesn’t happen, in a social-political setting. This chapter identifies the main principles and priorities of political settings of well-being in Europe. After a discussion of the dominant political theories found in this region, the central principles of the European Union Constitutional Treaty and Convention on Human Rights are identified. Next, an examination of a selection of country constitutions, along with “Beyond GDP” national well-being initiatives, demonstrates the core values of political conceptions of the good across Northern, Southern, Western and Central-Eastern Europe. Finally, evidence from the World Values Survey reveals the mass priorities of a selection of countries across these different regions. The features of European political conceptions of the good can be described as broadly liberal, with a particular emphasis on the social conditions of well-being.

Keywords

Well-being Europe “Beyond GDP” Values 

References

  1. EU. (2007). Beyond GDP—Measuring Progress, True Wealth and the Well-Being of Nations. Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/printpdf/136879. Accessed March 2019.
  2. EC. (2009). Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament—GDP and Beyond: Measuring Progress in a Changing World. Brussels: European Commission. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/Notice.do?checktexts=checkbox&val=499855. Accessed February 2019.
  3. Ferrera, M. (1996). The ‘Southern model’ of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. German Bundestag. (2013). Government Report on Wellbeing in Germany. Berlin: Federal Press Office. https://www.gut-leben-in-deutschland.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/LB/Government-Report-on-Wellbeing-in-Germany.pdf. Accessed January 2019.
  5. Inglehart, R., Haerpfer, C., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., et al. (Eds.). (2014). World Values Survey: Round Six—Country-Pooled Datafile Version. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp. Madrid: JD Systems Institute.
  6. INSEE. (2018). France, Social Portrait (2018 ed.). Paris: Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques. https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/3646243. Accessed January 2019.
  7. ISTAT. (2018). Equitable and Sustainable Well-Being in Italy. Rome: Instituto Nazionale di Statistica. https://www.istat.it/en/well-being-and-sustainability/the-measurement-of-well-being/bes-report. Accessed 18 February 2019.
  8. Nyman, H., Jónsdóttir, S., Blöndal, L., Etwil, P., Helgeson, T., Rønning, E., et al. (2016). A Nordic Welfare Indicator System (NOVI)—Report for the Nordic Council of Ministers. Reykjavík, Iceland: Ministry of Welfare.Google Scholar
  9. OECD. (2013). How’s Life? 2013: Measuring Well-Being. Paris: OECD. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201392-en. Accessed 4 December 2018.
  10. OECD. (2019). Social Spending (Indicator).  https://doi.org/10.1787/7497563b-en. Accessed 10 March 2019.
  11. ONS. (2011). Measuring What Matters: National Statistician’s Reflections on the National Debate on Measuring National Well-Being. Newport: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
  12. Randall, V. (2000). Childcare policy in the European states: Limits to convergence. Journal of European Public Policy, 7(3), 346–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. State of the Nordic Region. (2018). Nordic Council of Ministers. https://www.nordregio.org/publications/state-of-the-nordic-region-2018/. Accessed January 2019.
  14. Thévenon, O. (2011). Family policies in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. Population and Development Review, 37(1), 57–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations