Advertisement

Bridging Language, Literacy and Learning

  • Sangeeta Bagga-GuptaEmail author
  • Helle Pia Laursen
  • Anne Golden
Chapter
Part of the Educational Linguistics book series (EDUL, volume 39)

Abstract

In this chapter the complex relationships between the familiar, established concepts of “language”, “literacy” and “learning” are discussed and the need for building new understandings between these concepts and bridges across them is argued for. The concepts of language and literacy, and the interface between them, are not, and have never been static ones; however, there is increased recognition regarding the mobileness of semiotic resources due to accelerated globalization processes that have significantly shaped language and literacy practices. In addition, learning practices and processes are shaped by these developments and new demographics and technological advancements have changed the ways in which people (can) meet and (can) learn language and literacy. Different ways in which the three central L’s – Language, Literacy and Learning – have been introduced and attended to in the scholarship at large – particularly in the domains of Second Language Acquisition and (New) Literacy Studies, including scholarship on learning in multilingual contexts – are highlighted. This chapter also briefly introduces the other contributions in this volume.

Keywords

Monolingual bias Mobility Transitions Language sciences Educational sciences Social practices 

References

  1. Bagga-Gupta, S. (1995). Human development and institutional practices. Women, child care and the mobile creches. Linköping Studies in Arts and Sciences 130. Doctoral dissertation. Department of Communication Studies. Linköping University. Sweden.Google Scholar
  2. Bagga-Gupta, S. (2002). Explorations in bilingual instructional interaction: A sociocultural perspective on literacy. Journal of the European Association on Learning and Instruction, 5(2), 557–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00032-9.
  3. Bagga-Gupta, S. & Messina Dahlberg, G. (2017). Mobilization of nomenclature in the language and diversity areas in learning and instruction. Paper at the invited symposium of SIG 21 at EARLI 2017, Education in the crossroads of economy and politics – Role of research in the advancement of public good. 29 August – 2 September. Tampere, Finland.Google Scholar
  4. Bagga-Gupta, S. (2017a). signed languages in bilingual education. In: May S. (General Ed), Encyclopedia of language and education. García O. & Lin A. M.Y. (eds) Volume 5: Bilingual and multilingual education. (pp. 131–145). Rotterdam: Springer. https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-02258-1_12
  5. Bagga-Gupta, S. (2017b). Going beyond oral-written-signed-virtual divides: Theorizing languaging from social practice perspectives. Writing and Pedagogy, 8(1), 49–75.  https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.27046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bagga-Gupta, S. (2017c). Languaging and Isms of reinforced boundaries across settings: Multidisciplinary ethnographical explorations. In D. J. Rivers & K. Zotzmann (Eds.), ISMS in language education. Oppression, intersectionality and emancipation (Volume 11 series language and social life) (pp. 203–229). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  7. Bagga-Gupta, S. (2019). Languaging across time and space in educational contexts. Language studies and deaf studies. Deafness and Education International, 21(2–3), 65–73.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14643154.2019.1594081.
  8. Bagga-Gupta, S., & Messina Dahlberg, G. (2018). Meaning-making or heterogeneity in the areas of language and identity? The case of translanguaging and nyanlända across time and space. International Journal of Multilingualism, 15(4), 383–411.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2018.1468446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bagga-Gupta, S., Lyngvaer Hansen, A., & Feilberg, J. (Eds.). (2017). Identity revisited and reimagined. Empirical and theoretical contributions on embodied communication across time and space. Rotterdam: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Bagga-Gupta, S., Messina Dahlberg, G., & Lindberg, Y. (Eds.). (2019). Virtual sites as learning spaces. Critical issues on languaging research in changing eduscapes in the 21st century. London: Palgrave Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Barton, D. (1994). Literacy. An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bloome, D., Carter, S. P., Christian, B. M., Otto, S., & Shuart-Faris, N. S. (2005). Discourse analysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events. A microethnographic perspective. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Cenoz, J. and Gorter, D. (2011). A holistic approach to multilingual education: Introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 339–343.Google Scholar
  15. Clemsensen, N., & Holm, L. (2017). Relocalising academic literacy. Diversity, writing and collective learning in an international Master’s programme. Learning and Teaching, 10(3), 34–55.Google Scholar
  16. Collins, J., & Blot, R. K. (2003). Literacy and literacies. Texts, power and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cook, G. (2000). Language play. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. De Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
  19. Douglas Fir Group. (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. Modern Language Journal, 100, 19–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 286–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fra Tyler, A., & Ortega, L. (2018). Usage-inspired L2 instruction: An emergent, researched pedagogy. In A. E. Tyler, L. Ortega, M. Uno, & H. I. Park (Eds.), Usageinspired L2 instruction. Researched Pedagogy (pp. 3–28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  23. Gal, S., & Irvine, J. (1995). The boundaries of languages and disciplines: How ideologies construct difference. Social Research, 62, 967–1001.Google Scholar
  24. Garcia, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian.Google Scholar
  25. Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Gee, J. P. (2005). Semiotic social spaces and affinity spaces. In D. Barton & K. Tusting (Eds.), Beyond communities of practice: Language, power, and social context (pp. 214–232). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Golden, A., & Lanza, E. (2012). Narratives on literacies – Adult migrants’ identity construction in interaction. In L. Holm & A. Pitkänen-Huhta (Eds.), Literacy practices in transition. Perspectives from the Nordic countries. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  28. Goody, J. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Gynne, A., & Bagga-Gupta, S. (2015). Languaging in the twenty-first century. Exploring varieties and modalities in literacies inside and outside learning spaces. Language and Education, 29(6), 509–526.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2015.1053812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heath, S. B. (1984). Ways with words. Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Holm, L. (2017). Constructions of the literacy competence levels of multilingual students. Language and Education, 31(5), 449–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Holm, L., & Pôyhönen, S. (2012). Localizing supranational concepts of literacy in adult second language teaching. In A. Pitkänen-Huhta & L. Holm (Eds.), Literacy practices in transition. Perspectives from the Nordic countries. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  33. Hull, G., & Schultz, K. (2001). Literacy and learning out of school: A review of theory and research. Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 575–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hymes, D. (1962). In T. Gladwin & W. C. Sturtevant (Eds.), The ethnography of speaking in Anthropology and Human Behaviour (pp. 13–53). Washington, DC: Anthropological Society of Washington.Google Scholar
  35. Kramsch, C. (2000). Social discursive constructions of self in L2 learning. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 133–153). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kramsch, C. (2009). The multilingual subject. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Kramsch, C. (2014). Teaching foreign languages in an era of globalization: Introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 98, 296–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Landri, P., & Newman, E. (2014). Mobile sociologies of education. European Educational Research Journal, 13(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
  39. Laursen, H. P. (2013). Umbrellas and angels standing straight – A social semiotic perspective on multilingual children’s literacy. Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(6), 690–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Laursen, H. P., & Mogensen, N. D. (2016a). Language competence in movement: A child’s perspective. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13(1), 74–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Laursen, H. P., & Mogensen, N. D. (2016b). Timespacing competence. Multilingual children’s linguistic worlds. Social Semiotics, 26(5), 563–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Laursen, H. P., Daugaard, L. M., Ladegaard, U., Østergaard, W. O. B. and Wulff, L. (2018). Metalanguaging Matters. Multilingual Children Engaging with “the Meta”. International Journal of Bias, Identity and Diversities in Education, 3(1), 22–39.Google Scholar
  43. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Leung, C., & Lewkowitcz, J. (2017). Second language academic literacies: Evolving understandings. In B. V. Street & S. May (Eds.), Literacies and language education. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  45. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically. Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  47. Mäkitalö, Å., Linell, P., & Säljö, R. (2017). Memory practices and learning. Interactional, institutional and sociocultural perspectives. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing. Å. Mäkitalo.Google Scholar
  48. May, S. (Ed.). (2014). The multilingual turn. Implications for SLA, TESOL and bilingual education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Messina Dahlberg, G., & Bagga-Gupta, S. (2015). Learning on-the-go in institutional telecollaboration: Anthropological perspectives on the boundaries of digital spaces. In E. Dixon & M. Thomas (Eds.), Researching language learner interaction online: From social media to MOOCs (Vol. 13, pp. 259–281). San Marcos: CALICO.Google Scholar
  50. Ortega, L. (2014). Ways forward for a bi/multilingual turn in SLA. In S. May (Ed.), The multilingual turn. Implications for SLA, TESOL and bilingual education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Pavlenko, A. (2018). Superdiversity and why it isn’t. Reflections on terminological innovations and academic branding. In S. Breidbach, L. Küster, & B. Schmenk (Eds.), Sloganizations in language education discourse. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  52. Pavlenko, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Second language learning as participation and the (re)construction of selves. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 155–177). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Pietikäinen, S., & Pitkänen-Huhta, A. (2013). Multimodal literacy practices in the indigenous Sámi classroom: Children navigating in a complex multilingual setting. International Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 12, 230–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pitkänen-Huhta, A., & Holm, L. (Eds.). (2012). Literacy practices in transition. Perspectives from the Nordic countries. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  55. Pitkänen-Huhta, A., & Nikula, T. (2013). Teenagers making sense of their foreign language practices: Individual accounts indexing social discourses. In P. Benson & L. Cooker (Eds.), The applied linguistic individual: Sociocultural approaches to autonomy, agency and identity (pp. 104–118). Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
  56. Rampton, B. (1987). Stylistic variability and not speaking “normal” English: Some post-Labovian approaches and their implications for the study of interlanguage. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Second language acquisition in context (pp. 47–58). London: Prentice-Hall International.Google Scholar
  57. Rampton, B. (1995). Crossing: Language and ethnicity among adolescents. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  58. Rampton, B. (1997). Dichotomies, difference, and ritual in second language learning and teaching. Applied Linguistics, 20(3), 316–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Säljö, R. (2005). Lärande och kulturella redskap: om lärprocesser och det kollektiva minnet. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  60. Säljö, R. (2010). Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 53–64.Google Scholar
  61. Säljö, R. (2017). Afterword cultural experience, identities and diversification in the hands of researchers. In S. Bagga-Gupta, A. L. Hansen, & J. Fielberg (Eds.), Identity revisited and reimagined. Empirical and theoretical contributions on embodied communication across time and space (pp. 311–317). Rotterdam: Springer.Google Scholar
  62. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Street, B. V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Street, B. V. (2006). Autonomous and Ideological Models of Literacy: Approaches from New Literacy Studies. E-Seminar January 17–24. 2006, European Association of Social Anthropologists (EASA), Media Anthropology Network, 1–15. Available from http://www.philbu.net/mediaanthropology/street_newliteracy.pdf.
  65. Thorne, S. L. (2016). Bridging activities: Bringing the world into the language classroom. CASLS Intercom. Available from http://caslsintercom.uoregon.edu/content/21297.
  66. Vertovec, S. (2006). The emergence of super-diversity in Britain. Centre of Migration, Policy and Society. Oxford: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  67. Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sangeeta Bagga-Gupta
    • 1
    Email author
  • Helle Pia Laursen
    • 2
  • Anne Golden
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Education and Communication, Jönköping UniversityJönköpingSweden
  2. 2.Danish School of Education (DPU), Aarhus UniversityCopenhagenDenmark
  3. 3.MultiLing, Department of Linguistics and Scandinavian StudiesUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations