Advertisement

Language Learning and Literacy: The Multilingual Subject in Narratives of Older Immigrant Refugee Women

  • Anne GoldenEmail author
  • Elizabeth Lanza
Chapter
Part of the Educational Linguistics book series (EDUL, volume 39)

Abstract

The turn towards viewing literacy as social practice combines the notions of literacy and language learning. The situation of adult language learners with little or no schooling in countries with a highly literate self-image (such as in Scandinavia) necessitates reflection on the notions of language learning and literacy, especially in the case of refugees, who have been subjected to harrowing experiences in their flight to freedom. The recent emphasis on the multilingual subject in language learning has called for the importance of bringing the subject into focus when studying different aspects of multilingualism such as the learning of language and literacy in a new language. The present study meets this call through the analysis of interactions involving two medical doctors, former refugees, in conversation with a researcher in Norway. The doctors narrate their own experiences, and evaluate and comment on stories told by others, including their work with patients, who are also refugees. The analysis reveals a merging of language and literacy learning in the doctors’ conceptualization of activities necessary for the patients’ treatment. Central to the analysis are the notions of participation, agency, empowerment and embodiment.

Keywords

Refugees Rehabilitation Adult language learners Participation Narratives Empowerment 

References

  1. Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aitchinson, D. (2010). Extended, embodied cognition and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 35, 1–25.Google Scholar
  3. Bamberg, M. G. W. (1997). Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bamberg, M. G. W. (2012). Narrative analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 85–102). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.  https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (2000). Literacy practices. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanič (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 7–15). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Baynham, M. (2000). Narrative as evidence in literacy research. Linguistics and Education, 11(2), 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baynham, M., & Prinsloo, M. (2009). Introduction: The future of literacy studies. In M. Baynham & M. Prinsloo (Eds.), The future of literacy studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Advances in Linguistics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bigelow, M., & King, K. (2015). Somali immigrant youths and the power of print literacy. Writing Systems Research, 7, 4–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Block, D. (2007). The rise of identity in SLA research, Post Firth and Wagner (1997). The Modern Language Journal, 91(5), 863–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brockmeier, J., & Carbaugh, D. (2001). Narrative and identity: Studies in autobiography, self and culture. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2016). Embodied sociolinguistics. In N. Coupland (Ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cameron, L., Maslen, R., Todd, Z., Maule, J., Stratton, P., & Stanley, N. (2009). The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 24(2), 63–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Fina, A. (2003). Identity in narrative. A study of immigrant discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Fina, A. (2009). Narratives in interview – The case of accounts. For an interactional approach to narrative genres. Narrative Inquiry, 9(2), 233–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2015). The handbook of narrative analysis. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Franker, Qarin. (2007). Bildval i alfabetisering – en fråga om synsätt. ROSA 9, institutet för svenska som andrespråk, Göteborg universitet.Google Scholar
  18. Franker, Qarin. (2011). Literacitet och visuella texter. Studier om lärare och kortutbildade deltagere i sfi. Stockholms univeristet.Google Scholar
  19. Gee, J. P. (2000). The new literacy studies: From ‘socially situated’ to the work of the social. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanic Context (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing (pp. 180–196). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Gee, J. P. (2015). The new literacy studies. In J. Rowsell & K. Pahl (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of literacy studies (pp. 35–48). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Georgakopoulou, A. (2007). Small stories, interaction and identity. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Golden, A., & Lanza, E. (2012). Narratives on literacy: Adult migrants’ identity construction in interaction. In A. Pitkänen-Huta & L. Holm (Eds.), Literacy practices in transition. Perspectives from the Nordic countries (pp. 27–53). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  24. Golden, A., & Lanza, E. (2013). Metaphors of culture: Identity construction in migrants’ narrative discourse. Intercultural Pragmatics, 10(2), 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ignatow, G. (2007). Theories of embodied knowledge: New directions for cultural and cognitive sociology? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 37, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kozar, O., & Yates, L. (2017). Factors in language learning after 40: Insights from a longitudinal study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 57, 181–204.  https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2015-0113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kramsch, C. (2009). The multilingual subject. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  31. Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lanza, E. (2012). Empowering a migrant identity: Agency in narratives of a work experience in Norway. Sociolinguistic Studies, 6(2), 285–307.Google Scholar
  33. May, S. (2014). The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL and bilingual education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Miller, E. (2014). The language of adult immigrants. Agency in the making. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
  36. Palvenko, A. (2007). Autobiographic narratives as data in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 28(2), 163–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pavlenko, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Second language learning as participation and the (re)construction of selves. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 155–177). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Perry, K. H., Shaw, D. M., Ivanyuk, L., & Tham, Y. S. S. (2018). The “Ofcourseness” of functional literacy: Ideologies in adult literacy. Journal of Literacy Research, 50(1), 74–96.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X17753262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Street, B. (2008). New literacies, new times: Developments in literacy studies. In H. Hornberger Nancy (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and education. Boston: Springer.Google Scholar
  42. Street, B. (2009). Ethnography of writing and reading. In D. R. Olsen & N. Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Turner, M. (1996). The literary mind: The origins of thought and language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. van Lier, L. (2008). Agency in the classroom. In J. P. Lantolf & M. E. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
  45. Vitanova, G., Miller, E. R., Gao, X., & Deters, P. (2015). Introduction to theorizing and analyzing agency in second language learning: Interdisiplinary approaches. In P. Deters, X. Gao, E. R. Miller, & G. Vitanova (Eds.), Theorizing and analyzing agency in second language learning: Interdisiplinary approaches (pp. 1–17). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MultiLing, Center for Multilingualism across the Lifespan, Department of Linguistics and Scandinavian StudiesUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations