How Does Science Fit into Society? The Fractal Model
According to Studies of Expertise and Experience (SEE), expertise is socialisation into an expert domain. Society consists of many expert domains of different extent, some small and esoteric, some, like language, large and ubiquitous. Expert domains overlap and are embedded within each other like a fractal. Citizens possess ‘ubiquitous meta-expertise’ which enables them to choose domains when seeking expert opinions—such as whether a vaccine is safe. In such cases, citizens must be ready to treat domains of scientific expertise as more valuable than power or celebrity if we are to avoid dystopia and maintain pluralistic democracy with its checks and balances. Democracies depend on their citizens—‘the law of conservation of democracy’; this means we need more civic education to safeguard the future.
KeywordsStudies of Expertise and Experience (SEE) Fractal model Ubiquitous expertise Vaccination The law of conservation of democracy Civic education
- Brooks, David. 2017. The G.O.P. Is Rotting. The New York Times, December 7. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/07/opinion/the-gop-is-rotting.html
- ———. 2018. The End of the Two-Party System. The New York Times, February 12. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/12/opinion/trump-republicans-scarcity.html
- Collins, Harry. 1990. Artificial Experts: Social Knowledge and Intelligent Machines. Inside Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 2004. Interactional Expertise as a Third Kind of Knowledge. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 (2): 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHEN.0000040824.89221.1a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- ———. 2015. Expertise Revisited, Part I—Interactional Expertise. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 54 (Dec.): 113–123.Google Scholar
- ———. 2016. An Imitation Game Concerning Gravitational Wave Physics. ArXiv:1607.07373 [Physics], July. http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.07373
- ———. 2017. Gravity’s Kiss: The Discovery of Gravitational Waves. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 2019. Forms of Life: The Method and Meaning of Sociology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 2007. Rethinking Expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 2017a. Why Democracies Need Science. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 2017b. Probes, Surveys, and the Ontology of the Social. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 11 (3): 328–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815619825.
- Collins, Harry M., and Martin Kusch. 1998. The Shape of Actions: What Humans and Machines Can Do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Collins, Harry M., and Trevor J. Pinch. 1979. The Construction of the Paranormal: Nothing Unscientific Is Happening. The Sociological Review 27 (1_suppl): 237–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1979.tb00064.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1979. What Computers Can’t Do. New York: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 1992. What Computers Still Can’t Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Dreyfus, Hubert L., and Stuart E. Dreyfus. 1986. Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Durant, Darrin. 2018. Servant or Partner? The Role of Expertise and Knowledge in Democracy. The Conversation, March 9. https://theconversation.com/servant-or-partner-the-role-of-expertise-and-knowledge-in-democracy-92026
- ———. 2019. Ignoring Experts. In The Third Wave in Science and Technology Studies: Future Research Directions on the Study of Expertise and Experience, ed. D. Caudill, S.N. Connolly, and M.E. Gorman. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. In Press.Google Scholar
- Evans, Robert. 1999. Macroeconomic Forecasting: A Sociological Appraisal, Routledge Studies in the Modern World Economy. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- ———. 2014. Expert Advisers: Why Economic Forecasters Can Be Useful Even When They Are Wrong. In Experts and Consensus in Social Science, ed. Carlo Martini and Marcel Boumans, 233–252. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Evans, Robert, Harry M. Collins, Martin Hall, Hannah O’Mahoney, and Martin Weinel. 2019. Bonfire Night and Burns Night: Using the Imitation Game to Research English and Scottish Identities. In The Third Wave in the Sociology of Science: Selected Studies in Expertise and Experience, ed. David Caudill, Michael E. Gorman, and Shannon N. Conley, 109–131. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14335-0.
- Ezrahi, Yaron. 1990. The Descent of Icarus: Science and the Transformation of Contemporary Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Frank, Thomas. 2008. Wrecking Crew: How Conservatives Ruined the Government, Enriched Themselves, and Beggared the Nation. New York: Holt Paperbacks.Google Scholar
- Friedman, Jeffrey. 2006. Democratic Competence in Normative and Positive Theory: Neglected Implications of ‘The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics’. Critical Review 18: i–xliii.Google Scholar
- Gross, Paul R., Norman Levitt, and Martin W. Lewis, eds. 1997. The Flight from Science and Reason. Baltimore, MD and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Levitsky, Steven, and Daniel Ziblatt. 2018. How Democracies Die. 1st ed. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
- Mounk, Yascha. 2018a. How Populist Uprisings Could Bring down Liberal Democracy | Mounk, Yascha. The Guardian, March 4, sec. Opinion. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/04/shock-system-liberaldemocracy-populism.
- ———. 2018b. The People VS. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Polanyi, Michael. 1966. The Tacit Dimension. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Runciman, David. 2018. How Democracy Ends. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
- Sarewitz, Daniel. 2016. Saving Science. The New Atlantis 49: 4–40.Google Scholar
- Somin, Ilya. 2013. Democracy and Political Ignorance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Thorpe, Charles. 2008. Political Theory in Science and Technology Studies. In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, ed. Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch, and Judy Wajcman, 63–82. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Wehrens, Rik, and Bethany Hipple Walters. 2017. Understanding Each Other in the Medical Encounter: Exploring Therapists’ and Patients’ Understanding of Each Other’s Experiential Knowledge through the Imitation Game. Health, August. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459317721100.