Advertisement

Text Universe: A Pedagogical Strategy to Teach Literary Classics

  • Anette SvenssonEmail author
  • Stefan Lundström
Chapter

Abstract

Svensson and Lundström focus on teaching literary classics across analogue and digital media spaces by using a text universe, that is a source text and its various re-presentations, as a way to challenge educational discourses and create opportunities for students to expand socio-political boundaries. In the chapter, the Pride and Prejudice-universe is analysed in order to explore what the different re-presentations add to the particular universe as well as how they contribute to the understanding of the source text, Austen’s novel. Focusing on intersectionality in remakes (adaptations) and makeovers (fan fictions and variation novels), the analysis demonstrates how the text universe provides scope for subaltered voices within the intersectional framework and presents a counter-discourse to the historical space of the classic Pride and Prejudice, thus becoming a virtual learning site for socially negotiated knowledge.

Keywords

Text universe Literature teaching and learning Adaptations Fan fiction Intersectionality 

References

  1. Andrews, G. (Writer), & Zeff, D. (Director). (2008). Lost in Austen [Television Series]. UK: Mammoth Screen.Google Scholar
  2. Applebee, A. N. (1996). Curriculum as Conversation. Transforming Traditions of Teaching and Learning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Austen, J. (2003). Pride and Prejudice. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  4. Baker, J. (2013). Longbourn. London: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  5. Butler, T. T. (2018). Black Girl Cartography: Black Girlhood and Place-Making in Education Research. Review of Research in Education, 42(1), 28–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Calvino, I. (1999). Why Read the Classics? New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  7. Chasin, L. (Producer), & Wright, J. (Director). (2005). Pride & Prejudice [Motion Picture]. UK: Focus Features/Universal Pictures.Google Scholar
  8. Colm Hogan, P. (2014). Emplotting a Storyworld in Drama: Selection, Time, and Construal in the Discourse of Hamlet. In M.-L. Ryan & J.-N. Thon (Eds.), Storyworlds Across Media. Towards a Media-Conscious Narratology (pp. 50–66). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davies, A. (Writer), & Langton, S. (Director). (1995). Pride and Prejudice [Television Series]. UK: BBC.Google Scholar
  10. DuchessofWhimsy. (2012–2014). Impression. Retrieved March 31, 2019, from http://www.fanfiction.net
  11. Duffett, M. (2013). Understanding Fandom: An Introduction to the Study of Media Fan Culture. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  12. Fernandez, R. (Producer), & Hess, J. (Director). (2013). Austenland [Motion Picture]. UK: Fickle Fish Films.Google Scholar
  13. Fielding, H. (1996). Bridget Jones’s Diary: A Novel. London: Picador.Google Scholar
  14. Fielding, H. (Producer), & Maguire, S. (Director). (2001). Bridget Jones’s Diary. The US: Miramax.Google Scholar
  15. Foster Stovel, N. (2011). From Page to Screen: Emma Thompson’s Film Adaptation of Sense and Sensibility. Persuasions Online 32(1). Retrieved March 31, 2019, from http://www.jasna.org
  16. Gaisford, S. (1993). They Lived, Not Very Happily, Ever After: ‘Pemberley’ – Emma Tennant. Review of Pemberley: or Pride and Prejudice Continued by Emma Tennant. Retrieved March 31, 2019, from http://www.independent.co.uk
  17. Grahame-Smith, S., & Austen, J. (2009). Pride and Prejudice and Zombies: The Classic Regency Romance – Now with Ultraviolent Zombie Mayhem. Philadelphia: Quirk Books.Google Scholar
  18. Halliday, M. (1977). Learning How to Mean. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
  19. Halliday, M. (2007). On the Concept of ‘Educational Linguistics’. In J. J. Webster (Ed.), The Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday, Volume 9: Language and Education (pp. 354–367). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  20. Harris, A., & Leonardo, Z. (2018). Intersectionality, Race-Gender Subordination, and Education. Review of Research in Education, 42(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hayles, K. (2012). How We Think. Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Herendeen, A. (2010). Pride/Prejudice. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Hult, F. M. (2010). Theme-Based Research in the Transdisciplinary Field of Educational Linguistics. In F. M. Hult (Ed.), Directions and Prospects for Educational Linguistics (pp. 19–32). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Iedema, R. (2003). Multimodality, Resemiotization: Extending the Analysis of Discourse as Multi-Semiotic Practice. Visual Communication, 2, 29–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. James, P. D. (2011). Death Comes to Pemberley. London: Faber and Faber Ltd.Google Scholar
  26. Jenkins, H. (1992). Textual Poachers: Television Fans & Participatory Cultures. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture. Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Jenkins, H. (2007, March 21). Transmedia Storytelling 101 [Web Log Post]. Retrieved from http://henryjenkins.org/blog/2007/03/transmedia_storytelling_101.html
  29. Jones, S. G. (2002). The Sex Lives of Cult Television Characters. Screen, 41(1), 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. de los Reyes, P., & Mulinari, D. (2005). Intersektionalitet. Kritiska reflektioner över (o)jämlikhetens landskap. Stockholm: Liber.Google Scholar
  31. Lundström, S., & Olin-Scheller, C. (2014). Playing Fiction. The Use of Semiotic Resources in Role Play. Education Inquiry, 5(1), 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lundström, S., & Svensson, A. (2017). Fiktion och lärande i skolan och på fritiden. Forskning om undervisning och lärande, 17(2), 30–51.Google Scholar
  33. MachiavellianOrange. (2005). First Impressions, a Poem. Retrieved March 31, 2019, from http://www.fanfiction.net
  34. McCollough, C. (2009). The Independence of Miss Mary Bennet. New York: Pocket Books.Google Scholar
  35. Olin-Scheller, C. (2010). Författande Fans. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  36. Pucci, S. R., & Thompson, J. (2003). Introduction. The Jane Austen Phenomenon: Remaking the Past at the Millennium. In S. R. Pucci & J. Thompson (Eds.), Jane Austen and Co. Remaking the Past in Contemporary Culture (pp. 1–10). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  37. Pugh, S. (2005). The Democratic Genre: Fan Fiction in a Literary Context. Seren: Bridgend.Google Scholar
  38. Ryan, M.-L. (2014). Story/Worlds/Media: Tuning the Instruments of a Media-Conscious Narratology. In M.-L. Ryan & J.-N. Thon (Eds.), Storyworlds Across Media. Towards a Media-Conscious Narratology (pp. 25–49). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ryan, M.-L., & Thon, J.-N. (2014). Storyworlds Across Media: Introduction. In M.-L. Ryan & J.-N. Thon (Eds.), Storyworlds Across Media. Towards a Media-Conscious Narratology (pp. 1–21). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  40. Sauro, S. (2014). Lessons from the Fandom: Technology-Mediated Tasks for Language Learning. In M. Gonzáles-Lloret & L. Ortega (Eds.), Technology-Mediated TBLT. Researching Technology and Tasks (pp. 239–261). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sauro, S. (2017). Online Fan Practices and CALL. CALICO Journal, 34(2), 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sauro, S., & Sundmark, B. (2016). Report from Middle Earth: Fan Fiction Tasks in the EFL Classroom. ELT Journal, 70(4), 414–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Svensson, A. (2013). Pleasure and Profit: Re-Presentations of Jane Austen’s Ever-Expanding Universe. In L. Raw & R. Dryden (Eds.), The Global Jane Austen: Pleasure, Passion and Possessiveness in the Jane Austen Community (pp. 203–220). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Svensson, A. (2014). The Media Habits of Young People in Sweden: Using Fictional Texts in a School and a Recreational Context. Education Inquiry, 5(3), 337–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Svensson, A. (2015). “New Technologies” and “Old Values”: The Function of Various Text and Media Forms in Literary Studies. Educare, 2015(1), 117–138.Google Scholar
  46. Tefera, A. A., Powers, J. M., & Fischman, G. E. (2018). Intersectionality in Education: A Conceptual Aspiration and Research Imperative. Review of Research in Education, 42(1), vii–xvii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tennant, E. (1993). Pemberley: Or Pride and Prejudice Continued. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  48. The Swedish Media Council. (2017). Ungar & Medier. Stockholm: Medierådet.Google Scholar
  49. Thomas, E. E., & Stornaiuolo, A. (2016). Restorying the Self: Bending Toward Textual Justice. Harvard Educational Review, 86(3), 313–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tosenberger, C. (2008). “Oh My God, the Fan Fiction!”: Dumbledore’s Outing and the Online Harry Potter Fandom. Children’s Literature Association Quarterly, 33(2), 200–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Weldon, F. (Writer), & Coke, C. (Director). (1980). Pride and Prejudice, or First Impressions [Television Series]. UK: BBC.Google Scholar
  52. Yee, D. (1997). Pemberley: A Sequel to Pride and Prejudice and Presumption: An Entertainment. Review of Pemberley: Pride and Prejudice Continued by Emma Tennant. Retrieved March 31, 2019, from http://www.dannyreviews.com
  53. Zipfel, F. (2014). Fiction Across Media: Toward a Transmedial Concept of Fictionality. In M.-L. Ryan & J.-N. Thon (Eds.), Storyworlds Across Media. Towards a Media-Conscious Narratology (pp. 103–125). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Education and CommunicationJönköping UniversityJönköpingSweden
  2. 2.Department of Arts, Communication and EducationLuleå University of TechnologyLuleåSweden

Personalised recommendations