Advertisement

“Style Description: / Provenance: / Period:”: Martin Margiela, Fashion Authorship, and Romantic Literary History

  • Timothy CampbellEmail author
Chapter
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter connects the rise of literary history in the Romantic age with the ambiguous place of history in fashion “authorship.” Drawing from Foucault’s account of the eighteenth-century divergence of scientific and literary authorship (and the new insistence that “every text of poetry or fiction […] state its author and the date, place, and circumstance of its writing”), I consider how fashion authorship differently complements literary production. Fashion’s weaker author function typically licenses the appropriation of older styles without much regard to provenance. But recent developments—particularly in the work of the designer Martin Margiela, who systematically deconstructs authorship via exacting replications of past styles and self-effacing returns to the intrinsic capacities of clothing materials—bring these questions of authorship and history full circle.

Works Cited

  1. Adorno, Theodor W. Aesthetic Theory. Translated by Robert Hullot-Kantor, University of Minnesota Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  2. Barthes, Roland. The Fashion System. Translated by Matthew Ward and Richard Howard, University of California Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  3. Baumgarten, Linda. What Clothes Reveal: The Language of Clothing in Colonial and Federal America. Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, 2002.Google Scholar
  4. Blakley, Johanna. “Lessons from Fashion’s Free Culture.” TEDxUSC, April 2010, https://www.ted.com/talks/johanna_blakley_lessons_from_fashion_s_free_culture.
  5. Breward, Christopher. Fashion, Oxford History of Art Series, Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, Bill. Other Things. University of Chicago Press, 2015.Google Scholar
  7. Douglas, Aileen. Work in Hand: Script, Print, and Writing, 1690–1840. Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
  8. Evans, Caroline. Fashion at the Edge: Spectacle, Modernity, and Deathliness. Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  9. ———. “The Golden Dustman: A Critical Evaluation of the Work of Martin Margiela and a Review of Martin Margiela: Exhibition (9/4/1615).” Fashion Theory, vol. 2, no. 1, 1998, 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ———. The Mechanical Smile: Modernism and the First Fashion Shows in France and America, 1900–1929. Yale University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  11. Foucault, Michel. “What Is an Author?” Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, edited by Donald F. Bouchard, translated by Bouchard and Sherry Simon, Cornell University Press, 1977, 113–38.Google Scholar
  12. Groom, Nick. “Thomas Chatterton Was a Forger.” The Yearbook of English Studies, vol. 28, 1998, 276–91.Google Scholar
  13. Haywood, Ian. The Making of History: A Study of the Literary Forgeries of James Macpherson and Thomas Chatterton in Relation to Eighteenth-Century Ideas of History. Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  14. Maison Martin Margiela. Maison Martin Margiela. Rizzoli, 2009.Google Scholar
  15. Piper, Andrew. Book Was There: Reading in Electronic Times. University of Chicago Press, 2012.Google Scholar
  16. Price, Leah. How to Do Things With Books in Victorian Britain. Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
  17. Vinken, Barbara. Fashion Zeitgeist: Trends and Cycles in the Fashion System. Translated by Mark Hewson, Berg, 2005.Google Scholar
  18. Weber, Caroline. What Marie Antoinette Wore to the Revolution. Picador, 2006.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations