People, Not Numbers: Using Data to Humanize and Strengthen Teacher Support Systems in India

  • Mahjabeen RazaEmail author
  • Sharon Kim
  • Monal Jayaram
  • Vivek Sharma
  • Aditya Natraj
  • Edward Seidman
Part of the South Asian Education Policy, Research, and Practice book series (SAEPRP)


Utilizing data to improve teacher professional development presupposes a need to know how it can serve people in the education delivery system. In Gujarat, India progress is steered by using data to build personal agency and integrate actionable evaluation for improvement. The shift in the system, however, manifests from the core: the administrators, principals, and teachers. These individuals are leveraging data to improve their contribution to the system, and in the process, improving the system as a whole. The data that flow between these different levels are meaningful, easy to understand and use. The data are used in different ways, district administrators use them to hone their teacher training programming, principals use them to differentiate their support by teacher needs, and teachers use them for self-reflection and improving the quality of education in their classrooms. Previously siloed levels of the education system are connecting through the shared goals of professional and personal growth. And as a consequence, the Teacher Professional Development system is moving toward a person-centric focus, and moving away from a data-centric focused one.


  1. Allen, J. P., Pianta, R. C., Gregory, A., Mikami, A. Y., & Lun, J. (2011). An interaction-based approach to enhancing secondary school instruction and student achievement. Science, 333(6045), 1034–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, K. D., Bradshaw, C. P., Domitrovich, C., & Ialongo, N. (2013). Coaching teachers to improve implementation of the good behavior game. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 40(6), 482–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berwick, D. M. (2003). Disseminating innovations in health care. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289(15), 1969–1975. Scholar
  4. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cappella, E., Hamre, B. K., Kim, H. Y., Henry, D. B., Frazier, S. L., Atkins, M. S., & Schoenwald, S. K. (2012). Teacher consultation and coaching within mental health practice: Classroom and child effects in urban elementary schools. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80(4), 597–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Education Department Government of Gujarat, India. (2019). Gunotsav. Retrieved from
  7. Fullan, M. (2007). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Fullan, M., & Quinn, J. (2016). Coherence: The right drivers in action for schools, districts, and systems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  9. Glisson, C., Dukes, D., & Green, P. (2006). The effects of the ARC organizational intervention on caseworker turnover, climate, and culture in children’s service systems. Child Abuse and Neglect, 30(8), 855–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Government of India. (2019). Open government data: UT-wise number of teachers in educational institutions from 2010–11 to 2015–16. Retrieved from
  11. Gupta, A. (2017). Policy trends in teacher professionalization and professionalism in India. In M. Li, J. Fox, & S. Grieshaber (Eds.), Contemporary issues and challenge in early childhood education in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 221–239). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kaivalya Education Foundation. (2018). KEF Periodic Stakeholder Report of 2017–18 (Unpublished report). Kaivalya Education Foundation, India.Google Scholar
  13. Kaivalya Education Foundation. (2019). KEF Periodic Stakeholder Report of 2018–19 (Unpublished report). Kaivalya Education Foundation, India.Google Scholar
  14. Kidwai, H., Burnette, D., Rao, S., Nath, S., Bajaj, M., & Bajpai, N. (2013). In-service teacher training for public primary schools in rural India findings from district Morigaon (Assam) and district Medak (Andhra Pradesh). Retrieved from
  15. Kroelinger, C. D., Rankin, K. M., Chambers, D. A., Roux, A. V. D., Hughes, K., & Grigorescu, V. (2014). Using the principles of complex systems thinking and implementation science to enhance maternal and child health program planning and delivery. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 18(7), 1560–1564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lingard, L., Regehr, G., Orser, B., Reznick, R., Baker, G. R., Doran, D., … Whyte, S. (2008). Evaluation of a preoperative checklist and team briefing among surgeons, nurses, and anesthesiologists to reduce failures in communication. Archives of Surgery, 143, 12–17.
  17. Lundberg, M., & Wuermli, A. (Eds.). (2012). Children and youth in crisis: Protecting and promoting human development in times of economic shocks. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  18. Maruyama, M. (1963). The second cybernetics: Deviation-amplifying mutual causal processes. American Scientist, 51(2), 164–179.Google Scholar
  19. Masten, A. S. (2007). Resilience in developing systems: Progress and promise as the fourth wave rises. Development and Psychopathology, 19(3), 921–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maton, K. I., Seidman, E., & Aber, M. S. (2011). Empowering settings and voices for social change: An introduction. In M. S. Aber, K. I. Malton, & E. Seidman (Eds.), Empowering settings and voices for social change (pp. 1–11). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. NCF. (2005). National Curriculum Framework 2005. New Delhi: NCERT.Google Scholar
  22. Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act. (2009). Act no. 35 of 2009. Government of India.Google Scholar
  23. Seidman, E. (1988). Back to the future, community psychology: Unfolding a theory of social intervention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16(1), 3–24.
  24. Seidman, E. (2012). An emerging action science of social settings. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50(1–2), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Seidman, E., Raza, M., Kim, S., & McCoy, J. M. (2014). Teacher Instructional Practices & Processes System—TIPPS: Manual and Scoring System. New York: New York University.Google Scholar
  26. Seidman, E., & Tseng, V. (2011). Changing social settings: A framework for action. In M. S. Aber, K. I. Malton, & E. Seidman (Eds.), Empowering settings and voices for social change (pp. 12–37). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Singh, R., & Sarkar, S. (2015). Does teaching quality matter? Students learning outcome related to teaching quality in public and private primary schools in India. International Journal of Educational Development, 41, 153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Spier, E., Leenknecht, F., Carson, K., Bichay, K., & Faria, A. M. (2019). Tipping the scales: Overcoming obstacles to support school readiness for all in low-and middle-income countries. Early Years, 39(3), 229–242.
  29. Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: Bradford.Google Scholar
  30. Tseng, V., & Seidman, E. (2007). A systems framework for understanding social settings. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39(3–4), 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. UNESCO Institute of Statistics. (2019). India education and literacy. Retrieved from
  32. Verma, R. (2018). The Aseem community-based teacher training model: A response to India’s failed national teacher education policies. In N. Hobbel & B. Bales (Eds.), Navigating the common good in teacher education policy: Critical and international perspectives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. World Bank. (2018). World development report 2018: Learning to realize education’s promise. Retrieved from License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.
  34. Yoshikawa, H., & Hsueh, J. (2001). Child development and public policy: Toward a dynamic systems perspective. Child Development, 72(6), 1887–1903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yoshikawa, H., Leyva, D., Snow, C. E., Treviño, E., Barata, M., Weiland, C., … Arbour, M. C. (2015). Experimental impacts of a teacher professional development program in Chile on preschool classroom quality and child outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 51(3), 309.Google Scholar
  36. Yoshikawa, H., Wuermli, A. J., Raikes, A., Kim, S., & Kabay, S. B. (2018). Toward high-quality early childhood development programs and policies at national scale: Directions for research in global contexts. Social Policy Report, 31(1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mahjabeen Raza
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sharon Kim
    • 1
  • Monal Jayaram
    • 2
  • Vivek Sharma
    • 3
  • Aditya Natraj
    • 3
  • Edward Seidman
    • 1
  1. 1.New York UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Kaivalya Education FoundationGujaratIndia
  3. 3.Kaivalya Education FoundationDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations