Advertisement

Choosing Familiar Targets: The Devils You Wish You Did Not Know

  • James F. KennyEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Most individuals are likely to protect themselves from the sudden advances of strangers. However, they may be unprepared and unsure how to respond to aggressive encounters by intimates, family members, acquaintances, coworkers, or classmates. Intimates and family members are often able to disguise their aggressiveness by comingling it with gestures of affection, devotion, and obligation. Dangerous acquaintances, coworkers, and classmates exploit their access and knowledge of their targets to observe, assess, and make contact without drawing suspicion. These individuals often pose greater threats than strangers. They do not have to wait in the shadows or interview their targets while they plan the best time and place to initiate the attack. The FBI homicide reports over a period of fifteen years demonstrate that between seventy-three percent and seventy-nine percent of offenders were known to the victims (Harrell, 2012). NCVS data have consistently shown that strangers commit less than one quarter of all sexual assaults (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2016). NCVS reports spanning seventeen years reveal that acquaintances, friends, or intimate partners committed nearly seventy percent of stalking and harassment offenses (Catalano, 2015).

References

  1. Abbott, T. (2015). More teachers are having sex with their students. The Washington Post, January 20, 2015. Retrieved February 14, 2019 from https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/01/20/more-teachers-are-having-sex-with-their-students
  2. Ackerman, A., & Terry, K. (2012). Faulty sex offender policies. In F. Reddington & G. Bonham (Eds.), Flawed criminal justice policies. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brieding, M., Smith, S., Basile, K., Walters, M., Chen, J., & Merrick, M. (2014). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization – National intimate partner and sexual violence survey, United States, 2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 63, 1–24.Google Scholar
  4. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2016). Rates of rape/sexual assaults by victim-offender relationship, 2014. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  5. Catalano, S. (2015). Intimate partner violence, 1993–2010. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  6. Doerner, W., & Lab, S. (2017). Victimology. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2018). Policy guidelines on current issues of sexual harassment. Retrieved December 18, 2018, from https://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/currentissues.html
  8. Fisher, B., Cullen, F., & Turner, M. (2000). The sexual victimization of college women. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gelles, R., & Cornell, C. (1997). Intimate violence in families. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Gelles, R., & Straus, M. (1988). Intimate violence. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  11. Goldman, J. (1997). Details convey horror of Meghan’s death. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved February 7, 2019 from https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1997-05-06-mn-55980-story.html
  12. Goodstein, L. (2003). Decades of damage; Trail of pain in church crisis leads to nearly every diocese. The New York Times, January 12, 2003.Google Scholar
  13. Harrell, E. (2011). Workplace violence, 1993–2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  14. Harrell, E. (2012). Violent victimization committed by strangers, 1993–2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Justice Department.Google Scholar
  15. Lundberg-Love, P., & Geffner, R. (1989). Date rape: Prevalence, risk factors, and a proposed model. In M. Pirog-Good & J. Stets (Eds.), Violence in dating relationships: Emerging social issues. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  16. Morgan, R., & Kena, G. (2017). Criminal victimization (p. 2016). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  17. Muehlenhard, C., Andrews, S., & Beal, G. (1996). Beyond “just saying no”: Dealing with men’s unwanted sexual advances in heterosexual dating contexts. In S. Byers & L. O’Sullivan (Eds.), Sexual coercion in dating relationships. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  18. Musu-Gillett, L., Zhang, A., Wang, K., Zhang, J., Kemp, J., Dilberti, M., et al. (2018). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2017. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics & The Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  19. Namie, G. (2017). WBI: U.S. workplace bullying survey. Retrieved April 9, 2018, from https://www.workplacebullying.org
  20. Namie, G., & Namie, R. (2003). The bully at work. What you can do to stop the hurt and reclaim your dignity on the job. Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks Inc.Google Scholar
  21. National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. (2018). Family abductions: What we learned. Retrieved November 10, 2018 from https://www.missingkids.com
  22. National Sex Offender Public Website. (2018). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved November 10, 2018 from https://www.nsopw
  23. Norris, J., & Cubbins, L. (1992). Dating, drinking, and rape: Effects of victim’s and assailant’s alcohol consumption on judgements of their behavior and traits. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Norris, J., & Kerr, K. (1993). Alcohol and violent pornography: Responses to permissive and nonpermissive clues. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 11, 118–127.Google Scholar
  25. NYPD Counterterrorism Bureau. (2018). At least 17 killed in active shooter incident at high school in Parkland. Florida, NY: Terrorism Threat Analysis Group.Google Scholar
  26. Oudekerk, B., & Truman, J. (2017). Repeat violent victimization, 2005–14. Washington, D.C: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  27. Planty, M., Langton, L., Krebs, C., Berzofsky, M., & Smiley-McDonald, H. (2013). Female victims of sexual violence, 1994–2010. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Robers, S., Zhang, A., Morgan, R., & Musu-Gillette, L. (2015). Indicators of school crime and safety (p. 2014). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics & Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  29. Schneider, K., Pryor, J., & Fitzgerald, L. (2011). Sexual harassment research in the United States. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  30. Schwartz, M., & DeKeseredy. (1997). Sexual assault on the college campus: The role of male peer support. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Schwartz, R., & Weaver, A. (1998). Rohypnol, the date rape drug. Clinical Pediatrics; Glen Head, 37(5), 321.Google Scholar
  32. Simon, G. (1996). In sheep’s clothing: Understanding and dealing with manipulative people. Little Rock, AR: A. J. Christopher & Company.Google Scholar
  33. Sinozich, S. (2014). Rape and sexual assault victimization among college-age females, 1995–2013. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  34. Sinozick, S. (2014). Rape & sexual assault victimization among college-age females, 1995–2013. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  35. Snyder, H. (2000). Sexual assault of young children as reported to law enforcement: Victim, incident, and offender characteristics (no. NCJ 182990). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  36. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2018). There were 500 workplace homicides in the United States in 2016. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved February 27, 2019, from https://bls.gov/opub/ted/2018
  37. U.S. Government Accountability Office [GAO]. (2016). Workplace safety and health: Additional efforts needed to help protect health care workers from workplace violence. Washington, DC: GAO.Google Scholar
  38. U.S. Secret Service. (2018). Enhancing school safety using a threat assessment model: An operational guide for preventing targeted school violence. Washington, DC: National Threat Assessment Center.Google Scholar
  39. Walker, L. (1979). The battered woman. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fairleigh Dickinson UniversityTeaneckUSA

Personalised recommendations