Advertisement

Project Management in Healthcare Simulation Research

  • Cylie M. Williams
  • Felicity BlackstockEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

There are many frameworks available that can guide the researcher through the process of project management for simulation research. Projects are not routine business, but are a unique specified set of operations designed to accomplish specified goals. In the context of simulation research, the overarching goal is usually to answer a discrete research question. Projects therefore frequently bring together a team of people and stakeholders, who do not usually work together, and are often from different organizations, different career backgrounds, and across multiple geographical sites. This chapter explores the components of common key frameworks. Sequentially to a project management framework is the need for risk mitigation strategies to ensure smooth running of your project. Piloting your project can help identify many of the challenges you may face during the project. There are also many risks that are specific to simulation research. Many of these risks can be avoided with careful planning, attempting to manage the unmanageable, and the development of detailed timelines and budgets that are specific to research projects.

Keywords

Project management Simulation-based education Research Timelines Stakeholders Funding Resources Team management 

References

  1. 1.
    Kerzner HP. Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling and controlling. 12th ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2017.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rosenau MD, Githen GD. Successful project management: a step-by-step approach with practical examples. 4th ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2005.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Project Management Institute. A guide to the project management body of knowledge. 6th ed. Newton Square: Project Management Institute; 2017.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Meredith JK, Mantel SJ. Project management: a managerial approach. 8th ed. Wiley: Hoboken; 2012.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Royce W. Managing the development of large software systems. Technical Papers of Western Electronic Show and Convention. Los Angeles: WESCON; 1970.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Collyer S, Warren CMJ. Project management approaches for dynamic environments. Int J Proj Manag. 2009;27(4):355–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Snyder CS. A guide to the project management body of knowledge: PMBOK (®) guide. Newtown Square: Project Management Institute; 2014.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cervone HF. Understanding agile project management methods using Scrum. OCLC Syst Servi Int Digit Library Perspect. 2011;27(1):18–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Highsmith J. Agile project management: creating innovative products. 2nd ed. Boston: Pearson Education; 2010.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sargeant R, Hatcher C, Trigunarsyash B, Coffey V, Kraatz JA. Creating Value in Project Management using PRINCE2. Office of Government Commerce: London. 2010. Available from: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/52853/1/Final_Report__v1.0e%5B1%5D.pdf
  11. 11.
    Leape L, Berwick D, Clancy C, Conway J, Gluck P, Guest J, et al. Transforming healthcare: a safety imperative. BMJ Qual Saf. 2009;18(6):424–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Newman A, Jones R. Authorship of research papers: ethical and professional issues for short-term researchers. J Med Ethics. 2006;32(7):420–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hertzfeld HR, Link AN, Vonortas NS. Intellectual property protection mechanisms in research partnerships. Res Policy. 2006;35(6):825–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Primary and Allied Health CareMonash UniversityFrankstonAustralia
  2. 2.School of Science and HealthWestern Sydney UniversityCampbelltownAustralia

Personalised recommendations