• Oriana Binik


The main element worthy of ‘discovery’ in the interviewees’ narratives corresponds to the unexpected profundity of certain crime-related experiences. Reactions to crime can thus be considered an anchor sunk deep down in individual depths and capable of triggering radical questioning in them. An anchor because if, on one hand, crime fascinates and seduces, leading people into ‘underwater’ worlds, on the other it is something to return to, something which places us and others within society. As interested viewers we are kept anchored to our humanity, to the fact of being part of a social group. If this is the “era of conjunction”, the fascination with crime is, in its contemporary version, a phenomenon made up of contradictions: it can be proposed in its more boorishly spectacularised version and, at the same time, in certain specific circumstances, favour significant thought on the meaning of death and our journey through life.


  1. Dei, F. (2004). Sillabario in nero. Testimonianze. Patologie del nostro tempo, n. 438–439.Google Scholar
  2. Gans, H. J. (2012). Against culture versus structure. Identities, 19(2), 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Giglioli, D. (2011). Senza trauma: scrittura dell’estremo e narrativa del nuovo millennio (Vol. 55). Macerata: Quodlibet.Google Scholar
  4. Hall, S. (2006). Notes on deconstructing the popular. In J. Storey (Ed.), Cultural theory and popular culture: A reader (pp. 442–453). Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  5. Illouz, E. (2007). Cold intimacies: The making of emotional capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  6. Procter, J. (2004). Stuart Hall. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oriana Binik
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Milano-BicoccaMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations