Advertisement

Temporary Nature - A Win-Win for Nature and Developers: Tinkering with the Law in Order to Combat Biodiversity Loss

  • Chris BackesEmail author
  • Arnold van Kreveld
  • Hendrik Schoukens
Chapter
Part of the Contemporary Urban Design Thinking book series (CUDT)

Abstract

Temporary Nature has been pitched as a recent illustration of a more collaborative, reconciliatory approach to nature management in human-dominated landscapes. In essence, the novel concept is focused on providing more opportunities for nature development on temporarily available lands, which will subsequently be turned into a housing zone or an industrial site. By opening up these sites for nature development on a temporary basis, without hampering future developments, the concept might lead to net gains for endangered pioneer species. In doing so, Temporary Nature stands out as a remarkable win-win approach, which might help to enhance nature on lands which would, in lieu of such an instrument, remain out of reach for nature. The recent Dutch experiences with Temporary Nature have already revealed that such long-term beneficial effects effectively materialize on the ground. Even so, additional research will have to reveal the ideal circumstances under which this concept can yield an optimal outcome in terms of biodiversity gains and local acceptance.

Keywords

Temporary Nature Safe harbor agreement Reconciliation ecology Pioneer species EU Nature Directives 

References

  1. Agentschap Natuur en Bos. www.natuurenbos.be/beleid-wetgeving/vergunningen/tijdelijke-natuur. Accessed 27 Dec 2018
  2. Becker N, Handke J, Muchow T, Wellens C (2018) “Natur auf Zeit: Rechtliche und fachliche Rahmenbedingungen” Abschlussbericht des F+E-Vorhabens “Natur auf Zeit: Rechtliche und fachliche Rahmenbedingungen” (FKZ 3516 81 0800). (Hrsg.) Bundesamt für Naturschutz. BonnGoogle Scholar
  3. Cliquet A, Decleer K, Schoukens H (2015) Restoring nature in the EU: the only way is up? In: Born CH et al (eds) The habitats directive in its EU environmental law context: European nature’s best hope? Routledge, Oxford, pp 265–285Google Scholar
  4. Council of the European Communities (1992) Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7–50. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A31992L0043. Accessed 30 Dec 2018
  5. Court of First Instance (Bruges) (2014), case no. 14/119/CGoogle Scholar
  6. Dutch Council of State (2000), case no. 199901039/1Google Scholar
  7. Dutch Council of State (2010), case no. 20090772/1/R2Google Scholar
  8. European Parliament (2010) Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds OJ L 20, 26.1.2010, p. 7–25. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32009L0147. Accessed 30 Dec 2018
  9. Kishida D (2001) Safe Harbor agreements under the endangered species act: are they right for Hawaii? Univ Hawaii Law Rev 23:507–539Google Scholar
  10. Linnartz L (2006) Tijdelijke natuur en beschermde soorten: permanente winst Een ecologische onderbouwing Bureau Stroming en ARK Nature InnovatieNetwerk rapportnr 06.2.134, ISBN 90-5059-306-2Google Scholar
  11. Lundholm JT, Richardson PJ (2010) Habitat analogues for reconciliation ecology in urban and industrial environments. J Appl Ecol 47:966–975Google Scholar
  12. Ministerie van Economische Zaken (2015) Temporary nature policy, 10 September 2015, Staatcourant 2015, 29016Google Scholar
  13. Paulich N (2010) Increasing private conservation through incentive mechanisms. Stanford J Animal Law Policy 3:106–158Google Scholar
  14. Reker J (2006) Tijdelijke Natuur, permanente winst. Bureau Stroming en ARKGoogle Scholar
  15. Schoukens H (2015) Habitat restoration on private lands in the United States and the EU: moving from contestation to collaboration. Utrecht Law Rev 11(1):33–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schoukens H (2017) Reconciliation ecology in practice: legal and policy considerations when implementing temporary nature on undeveloped lands in the European Union. Land Use Policy 67:178–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schoukens H, Bastmeijer K (2015) Species protection in the European Union: how strict is strict? In: Born CH et al (eds) The habitats directive in its EU environmental law context: European nature’s best hope? Routledge, Oxford, pp 121–146Google Scholar
  18. Smit GFJ, Melchers M (2016) Tijdelijke natuur Westpoort. Ontwikkeling 2009–2016. Bureau Waardenburg. Rapportnr, Culemborg, pp 16–259Google Scholar
  19. Tijdelijkenatuur.nl (undated) Overzicht tijdelijke natuur per Provincie. URL: http://www.tijdelijkenatuur.nl/projecten/. Accessed 27 Dec 2018
  20. US Fish and Wildlife Service (1999) Safe Harbor agreements and candidate conservation agreements with assurances; Announcement of final Safe Harbor policy; announcement of final policy for candidate conservation agreements with assurances; Final Rule and NoticesGoogle Scholar
  21. Vliegenthart A (2012) Kwaliteit van tijdelijke natuur in de haven van Amsterdam. Wageningen, De Vlinderstichting. Rapport VS2012.022Google Scholar
  22. Vriens L, Gyselings R, Mergeay J, Van den Bergh E (2013) Advies betreffende de ecologische effecten van tijdelijke natuur. INBO, Brussel. Rapportnr: A.2012.168Google Scholar
  23. Wheeler, D.P. and Rowberry, R, M. (2009) Habitat conservation plans and the endangered species act. In: Baur, D.C. and Irvin, W.R. (Eds.) Endangered species act: law, policy and perspectives. Chicago: ABA Publishing. pp. 223–224Google Scholar
  24. Woldendorp H., Backes Ch W (2011) Tijdelijke Natuur - Advies over de juridische aspecten, Utrecht 2006, ISBN 90-5059-308-9. (The concept finally was accepted by the District Court of Amsterdam in 2011: Rechtbank Amsterdam 27 May 2011, ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2011:BU4250. This judgment was upheld in higher appeal at the Dutch Council of State in 2012: ABRvS 25 July 2012, ECLI:NL:RVS:2012:BX2544.)Google Scholar
  25. Zekhuis M, De Gelder A (2013) Monitoring vier jaar Tijdelijke Natuur Eeserwold. Landschap Overijssel. Gefinancierd door Ministerie van Economische Zaken & Team Natuurlijk! Ondernemen, DalfsenGoogle Scholar
  26. Zekhuis M, Van der Weele J (2011) Broedvogels van braakliggende bedrijventerreinen. In: Schelhaas H, Dekkers G (eds) Vogels in Overijssel. Zwolle, WBooks, pp 118–125Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Backes
    • 1
    Email author
  • Arnold van Kreveld
    • 2
  • Hendrik Schoukens
    • 3
  1. 1.Professor of Environmental and Planning LawUtrecht Centre of Water, Oceans and Sustainability Law (UCWOSL)UtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Temporary Nature FoundationHoutenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Ghent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations