Advertisement

Can the Danger of Nuclear War Be Eliminated by Disarmament?

  • Campbell CraigEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies book series (RCS)

Abstract

How can we reduce, or eliminate, the possibility of nuclear war in a world of international anarchy? Several recent initiatives seek to address this problem by stigmatizing the possession of nuclear weaponry and reviving the idea of general nuclear disarmament. If the very possession, not to mention use, of nuclear weapons becomes regarded as morally obscene, peoples and states will eventually divest themselves of the bomb and we will arrive at a world free of nuclear weapons simply by virtue of an ideational shift. In this chapter, I argue that the unique characteristics of nuclear weapons make disarmament in an interstate world impossible. Only the elimination of international anarchy can put a certain end to the possibility of nuclear war.

Keywords

Nuclear disarmament Non-proliferation complex World state 

References

  1. Carr, E. H. (1946). The twenty years crisis, 1919–1939. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Craig, C. (2003). Glimmer of a new Leviathan. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Craig, C. (2018). Solving the nuclear dilemma: Is a world state necessary? Journal of International Political Theory, online first at. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1755088218795981?journalCode=iptb. Accessed 19 March 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Craig, C., & Logevall, F. (2009). America’s Cold War: The politics of insecurity. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Craig, C., & Radchenko, S. (2008). The atomic bomb and the origins of the Cold War. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Craig, C., & Ruzicka, J. (2013). The nonproliferation complex. Ethics and International Affairs, 27(3), 329–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Craig, C., & Ruzicka, J. (forthcoming). US unipolar preponderance and nuclear nonproliferation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Feiveson, H. A., Glaser, A., Mian, Z., & von Hippel, F. N. (2014). Unmaking the bomb: A fissile material approach to nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gaddis, J. L. (2006). The Cold War: A new history. New York: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  10. Kmentt, A. (2013). How divergent views on disarmament threaten the NPT. Arms Control Today. https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2013_12/How-Divergent-Views-on-Nuclear-Disarmament-Threaten-the-NPT. Accessed 19 March 2019.
  11. Kroenig, M. (2018). The logic of American nuclear strategy: Why strategic superiority matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Martin, S. (2013). The continuing value of nuclear weapons: A structural realist analysis. Contemporary Security Policy, 34(1), 174–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Meyer, P., & Sauer, T. (2018). The nuclear ban treaty: A sign of global impatience. Survival, 60(2), 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mueller, J. (1989). Retreat from doomsday: The obsolescence of major war. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Mueller, J. (2009). Atomic obsession. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature: Why violence has declined. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  17. Ritchie, N. (2013). Valuing and devaluing nuclear weapons. Contemporary Security Policy, 34(1), 146–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ritchie, N. (2019). A hegemonic nuclear order: Understanding the ban treaty and the power politics of nuclear weapons. Contemporary Security Policy, advance online at. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13523260.2019.1571852. Accessed 19 March 2019.
  19. Ruzicka, J. (2018). The next great hope: The humanitarian approach to nuclear weapons. Journal of International Political Theory, online at. https://journals-sagepub-com.abc.cardiff.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1177/1755088218785922. Accessed 19 March 2019.
  20. Sagan, S., & Waltz, K. (2010, September/October). The great debate: Is nuclear zero the best option? The National Interest, 109.Google Scholar
  21. Sauer, T., & Reveraert, M. (2018, December 24). The potential stigmatizing effect of the treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons. The Nonproliferation Review, online. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10736700.2018.1548097. Accessed 19 March 2019.
  22. Schelling, T. (2009). A world without nuclear weapons? Daedalus, 138(4), 124–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Waltz, K. (1981). The spread of nuclear weapons: More may better. The Adelphi Papers, 21(171).  https://doi.org/10.1080/05679328108457394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Westad, O. A. (2017). The Cold War: A world history. London: Penguin Random House.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations