Nuclear pacifists categorically reject nuclear weapons on ethical grounds. This volume aims to prolong the ideas behind this particular tradition of thought that we would like to brandish as non-nuclear peace. The Nuclear Ban Treaty (2017) shows the impatience by the majority of states in the world with respect to the implementation of the legal promise of getting rid of nuclear weapons, made by the five formal nuclear weapon states in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Regardless of the impact of the Ban Treaty, it is useful to start thinking about the next phase, namely how to imagine non-nuclear peace in light of contemporary and future global political and cultural conditions, and how to reach and sustain a peaceful order without nuclear weapons.
KeywordsNon-nuclear peace Nuclear Ban Treaty NPT Public intellectuals
- Gaddis, J. L. (1989). The long peace: Inquiries into the history of the cold war. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Roberts, B. (2018, March 22). Ban the bomb? Or bomb the ban? European Leadership Network (ELN) Policy Brief. https://www.europeanleadershipnetwork.org/policy-brief/ban-the-bomb-or-bomb-the-ban/. Accessed 4 March 2019.
- Sauer, T., & Reveraert, M. (online December 2018, in print 2019). The potential stigmatizing effect of the treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons. The Nonproliferation Review, 25(5–6), 437–455.Google Scholar
- Waltz, K. (1981). The spread of nuclear weapons: More may be better. Adelphi Paper, 21(171). London: IISS.Google Scholar