Advertisement

Quality of Life and Complications After Percutaneous Tracheostomy

  • M. Vargas
  • G. Servillo
Chapter

Abstract

Health is defined as a complete state of well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity; so the assessment of quality of life (QOL) has become a crucial aspect in the evaluation of patient outcome. ICU patients are at high risk of serious impairments after the discharge, and the impact on functional, physical and mental status can be dramatic. Many questionnaires have been so far used to determine QOL in ICU, but there are only poor reports which specifically focused this aspect in tracheostomized patients. The main difficulty to establish the influence of tracheotomy on QOL is the lack of specific instruments such as questionnaires which are able to distinguish the role of tracheostomy from the underlying disease and comorbidity when determining the psychological and functional status of the patient.

References

  1. 1.
    Ridley SA, Chrispin PS, Scotton H, Rogers J, Lloyd D. Changes in quality of life after intensive care: comparison with normal data. Anaesthesia. 1997;52(3):195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dowdy DW, Eid MP, Sedrakyan A, Mendez Tellez PA, Pronovost PJ, Herridge MS, et al. Quality of life in adult survivors of critical illness: a systematic review of the literature. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31(5):611–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    The EuroQol Group. EuroQol-5 a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16:199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brazier JE, Walters SJ, Nicholl JP, et al. Using the SF-36 and Euroqol on an elderly population. Qual Life Res. 1996;5:195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cuthbertson BH, Scott J, Strachan M, et al. Quality of life before and after intensive care. Anaesthesia. 2005;60:332–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ware J, Snow K, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 health survey: manual and interpretation guide. Boston: The Health Institute; 1993.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chrispin P, Scotton H, Rogers J, Llojd D, Ridley A. Short form 36 in the intensive care unit: assessment of acceptability, reliability and validity of the questionnaire. Anaesthesia. 1997;52:15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, et al. The Nottingham health profile: subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc Sci Med A. 1981;15:221–9.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nielsen D, Sellgren J, Ricksten SE. Quality of life after cardiac surgery complicated by multiple organ failure. Crit Care Med. 1997;25:52–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bergner M, Bobbit R, Kressel S. The sickness impact profile: conceptual foundation and methodology for the development of a health status measure. Int J Health Serv. 1976;6:393–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tian Z, Miranda D. Quality of life after intensive care with the sickness impact profile. Intensive Care Med. 1995;21:422–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oeyen SG, Vandijck DM, Benoit DD, Annemans L, Decruyenaere JM. Quality of life after intensive care: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(12):2386–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Antonneli M, Michetti V, Di Palma A, Conti G, Pennisi A, Arcangeli A, et al. Percutaneous translaryngeal versus surgical tracheostomy: a randomized trial with 1-yr double blind follow-up. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:1015–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bosel J, Schiller P, Hook Y, Andes M, Neumann JO, Poli S, Amiri H, Schonenberger S, et al. Stroke-related early tracheostomy versus prolonged orotracheal intubation in neurocritical care trial (SETPOINT). A randomized pilot trial. Stroke. 2013;44:21–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rankin J. Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. II. Prognosis. Scott Med J. 1957;2(5):200–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Engoren M, Engoren CA, Buderer NF. Hospital and long-term outcome after tracheostomy for respiratory failure. Chest. 2004;125:220–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vargas M, Servillo G, Arditi E, Brunetti I, Pecunia L, Salami D, Putensen C, Antonelli M, Pelosi P. Tracheostomy in intensive care unit: a national survey in Italy. Minerva Anestesiol. 2013;79:156–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Putensen C, Theuerkauf N, Guenther U, Vargas M, Pelosi P. Percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2014;18:544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Silvester W, Goldsmith D, Uchino S, Bellomo R, Knight S, et al. Percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy: a randomized controlled study with long-term follow-up. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(8):2145–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fikkers BG, Staatsen M, van den Hoogen FJA, van der Hoeven JG. Early and late outcome after single step dilatational tracheostomy versus the guide wire dilating forceps technique: a retrospective randomized clinical trial. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:1103–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Koitschev A, Simon C, Blumenstock G, Mach H, Graumuller S. Suprastomal tracheal stenosis after dilatational and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients. Anaesthesia. 2006;61:832–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    van Heurn LW, Goei R, de Ploeg I, Ramsay G, Brink PR. Late complications of percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy. Chest. 1996;110:1572–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Romero CA, Marambio A, Larrondo J, Walker K, Lira MT, Tobar E, et al. Swallowing dysfunction in non neurologic critically ill patients who require percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Chest. 2010;137(6):1278–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Vargas
    • 1
  • G. Servillo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological SciencesUniversity of Naples “Federico II”NaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations