Advertisement

From Openness to Change to Patients’ Satisfaction: A Business Process Management Approach

  • Yevgen Bogodistov
  • Jürgen MoormannEmail author
  • Rainer Sibbel
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 360)

Abstract

On the example of the current health-care reform in Ukraine, the impact of process changes on the level of individual providers of care is analyzed. The empirical study focuses on the question of how much effective Business Process Management (BPM) and openness to change can help health-care providers like family doctors to keep their performance during a structural transformation. The theoretical framework of the study is based on an innovative human-centric approach to BPM. The results show that openness to change reduces the risk of burnout and reduces cooperation issues with other doctors and hospital departments. At the same time, burnout and cooperation issues increase the number of errors and the time span of diagnosing patients significantly.

Keywords

Business Process Management Process change Job demands–resources model Health-care management 

References

  1. 1.
    Fuchs, V.R.: Economics, values, and health care reform. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 86(1), 1–24 (1996)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Saltman, R.B., Figueras, J.: European health care reform: analysis of current strategies. WHO Regional Publications European Series No. 72, pp. 5–38 (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dillon, K., Prokesch, S.: Megatrends in global health care. Harv. Bus. Rev. (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Franco, L.M., Bennett, S., Kanfer, R.: Health sector reform and public sector health worker motivation: a conceptual framework. Soc. Sci. Med. 54(8), 1255–1266 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schaufeli, W.B.: Applying the job demands-resources model. Org. Dyn. 2(46), 120–132 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    WHO: Ukraine Reform Monitor, October 2017. http://carnegieendowment.org/2017/10/10/ukraine-reform-monitor-october-2017-pub-73330. Accessed 5 Jan 2018
  7. 7.
    OECD: European Commission (ed.): Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd edn, Paris (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Haggerty, J.L., Reid, R.J., Freeman, G.K., Starfield, B.H., Adair, C.E., McKendry, R.: Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ 327(7425), 1219 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kvamme, O.J., Olesen, F., Samuelsson, M.: Improving the interface between primary and secondary care: a statement from the European working party on quality in family practice (EQuiP). Qual. Saf. Health Care 10(1), 33–39 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gérvas, J., Ferna, M.P., Starfield, B.H.: Primary care, financing and gatekeeping in Western Europe. Fam. Pract. 11(3), 307–317 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Robinson, P.H.: Review article: recognition and treatment of eating disorders in primary and secondary care. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 14(4), 367–377 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barkham, M., Gilbert, N., Connell, J., Marshall, C., Twigg, E.: Suitability and utility of the CORE-OM and CORE-A for assessing severity of presenting problems in psychological therapy services based in primary and secondary care settings. Br. J. Psychiatry 186(3), 239–246 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thompson, C., et al.: Effects of a clinical-practice guideline and practice-based education on detection and outcome of depression in primary care: Hampshire depression project randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355(9199), 185–191 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Browne, G., et al.: Economic evaluations of community-based care: lessons from twelve studies in Ontario. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 5(4), 367–385 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Starfield, B.: Is strong primary care good for health outcomes. In: The Future of Primary Care: Papers for a Symposium Held on 13th September 1995. Office of Health Economics, pp. 18–29 (1995)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barney, J.: Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manag. 17(1), 99–120 (1991)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A.: Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg. Manag. J. 18(7), 509–533 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hammer, M., Champy, J.: Reengineering the Corporation. HarperCollins, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M.: Handbook on Business Process Management. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01982-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dumas, M., Rosa, M.L., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kettinger, W.J., Teng, J.T., Guha, S.: Business process change: a study of methodologies, techniques, and tools. MIS Q. 55–80 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wanberg, C.R., Banas, J.T.: Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace. J. Appl. Psychol. 85(1), 132 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schmelzer, H.J., Sesselmann, W.: Geschäftsprozessmanagement in der Praxis: Kunden zufriedenstellen, Produktivität steigern, Wert erhöhen, 8th edn. Hanser, Munich (2013)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E., De Boer, E., Schaufeli, W.B.: Job demands and job resources as predictors of absence duration and frequency. J. Vocat. Behav. 62(2), 341–356 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Demerouti, E., Bakker, A.B., Nachreiner, F., Schaufeli, W.B.: The job demands-resources model of burnout. J. Appl. Psychol. 86(3), 499 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E.: The job demands-resources model: state of the art. J. Manag. Psychol. 22(3), 309–328 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Brotheridge, C.M., Grandey, A.A.: Emotional labor and burnout: comparing two perspectives of “people work”. J. Vocat. Behav. 60(1), 17–39 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hobfoll, S.E.: The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: advancing conservation of resources theory. Appl. Psychol. 50(3), 337–421 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Edwards, N., Saltman, R.B.: Re-thinking barriers to organizational change in public hospitals. Isr. J. Health Policy Res. 6(1), 1–11 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ashton-James, C.E., Ashkanasy, N.M.: Affective events theory: a strategic perspective. Res. Emot. Organ. (4), 1–34 (2008)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dahl, M.S.: Organizational change and employee stress. Manag. Sci. 57(2), 240–256 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Haines, V.A., Hurlbert, J.S., Zimmer, C.: Occupational stress, social support, and the buffer hypothesis. Work Occup. 18(2), 212–235 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    van Dam, K., Oreg, S., Schyns, B.: Daily work contexts and resistance to organisational change: the role of leader–member exchange, development climate, and change process characteristics. Appl. Psychol. 57(2), 313–334 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Allen, J., Jimmieson, N.L., Bordia, P., Irmer, B.E.: Uncertainty during organizational change: managing perceptions through communication. J. Chang. Manag. 7(2), 187–210 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kristensen, T.S., Borritz, M., Villadsen, E., Christensen, K.B.: The Copenhagen burnout inventory: a new tool for the assessment of burnout. Work Stress 19(3), 192–207 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kowal, J., Gurba, A.: Mobbing and burnout in emerging knowledge economies: an exploratory study in Poland. In: Proceedings of the 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 4123–4132 (2016)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Reichl, C., Leiter, M.P., Spinath, F.M.: Work–nonwork conflict and burnout: a meta-analysis. Hum. Relat. 67(8), 979–1005 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. (eds.): Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2010)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Churchill, G.A.: A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J. Mark. Res. 16(1), 64–73 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hu, L., Bentler, P.M.: Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. 6(1), 1–55 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fornell, C., Bookstein, F.L.: Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. J. Mark. Res. 19, 440–452 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., Thiele, K.O.: Mirror, mirror on the wall: a comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 45(5), 616–632 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lee, R.T., Lovell, B.L., Brotheridge, C.M.: Tenderness and steadiness: relating job and interpersonal demands and resources with burnout and physical symptoms of stress in Canadian physicians. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 40(9), 2319–2342 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lee, R.T., Lovell, B.L., Brotheridge, C.M.: Relating physician emotional expression to shared understanding and shared decision-making with patients. Int. J. Work. Organ. Emot. 3(4), 336–350 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cherniss, C.: Staff Burnout: Job Stress in the Human Services. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills (1980)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sobel, M.E.: Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociol. Methodol. (13), 290–312 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    MacKinnon, D.P., Fairchild, A.J., Fritz, M.S.: Mediation analysis. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 58, 593–614 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Chin, W.W.: Commentary: issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Q. 22(1), 7–16 (1998)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Grau, C., Moormann, J.: Empirical evidence for the impact of organizational culture on process quality. In: Proceedings of the 22nd European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Tel Aviv (2014)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Trkman, P.: The critical success factors of business process management. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 30(2), 125–134 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Jeston, J., Nelis, J.: Business Process Management, 3rd edn. Routledge, London (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Markos, S.M., Sridevi, M.S.: Employee engagement: the key to improving performance. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 5(12), 89 (2010)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Burke, R.J., Greenglass, E.R., Schwarzer, R.: Predicting teacher burnout over time: effects of work stress, social support, and self-doubts on burnout and its consequences. Anxiety Stress Coping 9(3), 261–275 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yevgen Bogodistov
    • 1
  • Jürgen Moormann
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rainer Sibbel
    • 1
  1. 1.Frankfurt School of Finance and Management, ProcessLabFrankfurtGermany

Personalised recommendations