Advertisement

Integrating Human Rights into Teaching Pedagogy: An Embodied Approach

  • Alison Grove O’GradyEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter investigates how teaching and learning about human rights law can be embedded into a university curriculum for pre-service teachers. Fundamental to this work is an understanding of the humanising, participatory, motivating and practical approach that can be achieved through embodied learning. Research in this field is strongly linked to attitudinal and behavioural change. The chapter discusses opportunities to use pedagogy that will develop cultural citizenship, interconnectedness and widespread participation to develop students’ professional and ethical identity through embodied learning.

References

  1. Arnold, R. (1993). The nature and role of empathy in human development and in Drama in education. In W. Michaels (Ed.), Drama in education: The state of the art II (pp. 56–68). Rozelle: Educational Drama Association.Google Scholar
  2. Australian Human Rights Commission. www.humanrights.gov.au/about/what-are-human-rights? Accessed 1 Apr 2019.
  3. Britzman, D. P. (2003). Decentering discourses in teacher education: Or, the unleashing of unpopular things. The Journal of Education, 173(3), 60–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bundy, P. (2014). Engagement and liveness. In J. O’Toole, R. Adams, M. Anderson, B. Burton, & R. Ewing (Eds.), Young audiences, theatre and the cultural conversation (pp. 115–128). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cahill, H. (2014). Withholding the personal story: Using theory to orient practice in applied theatre about HIV and human rights. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 19(1), 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Conrad, D. (2005). Rethinking “at-risk” in drama education: Beyond prescribed roles. Research in Drama Education, 10(1), 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Drama Australia. (2015). Equity and diversity guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.dramaaustralia.org.au/documents
  8. Dunn, J., & O’Toole, J. (2009). When worlds collude: Exploring the relationship between the actual, the dramatic and the virtual. In M. Anderson, J. Carroll, & D. Cameron (Eds.), Drama education with digital technology (pp. 20–37). London: Continuum Books.Google Scholar
  9. Fleming, J., Ewing, R., Anderson, M., & Klieve, H. (2014). Reimagining the wheel: The implications of cultural diversity for mainstream theatre programming in Australia. Theatre Research International, 39(2), 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Flowers, N. (2015). The global movement for human rights education. Radical Teacher, 103, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Freebody, K., & Finneran, M. (2013). Drama and social justice: Power, participation and possibility. In M. Anderson & J. Dunn (Eds.), How drama activates learning: Contemporary research and practice (pp. 47–63). London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  12. Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of freedom. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  13. Gay, G., & Kirkland, K. (2003). Developing cultural critical consciousness and self-reflection in preservice teacher education. Theory Into Practice, 42(3), 181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gjaerum, R. G. (2013). Applied theatre research: Discourses in the field. European Scientific Journal, 3, 347–361.Google Scholar
  15. Gonzalez, J. B. (2006). Temporary stages. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  16. Haseman, B., & O’Toole, J. (1986). Dramawise: An introduction to the elements of drama. Richmond: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  17. Heathcote, D., & Bolton, G. M. (1995). Drama for learning, Dorothy Heathcote’s mantle of the expert approach to education. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  18. Manuel, J., & Hughes, J. (2006). ‘It has always been my dream’: Exploring pre-service teachers’ motivations for choosing to teach. Teacher Development, 10(1), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mulvany, K., Silvey, C., & Mulvany, K. (2017). Jasper Jones (Rev. ed.). Strawberry Hills: Currency Press.Google Scholar
  20. Neelands, J. (1990). Structuring drama work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Neelands, J. (2004). Miracles are happening: Beyond the rhetoric of transformation in the Western traditions of drama education. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 9(1), 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Neelands, J. (2010). 11/09 – The space in our hearts. In P. O’Connor (Ed.), Creating democratic citizenship through drama education: The writings of Jonothan Neelands (pp. 119–130). Stoke-on-trent: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  23. O’Connor, P. (2009). Unnoticed miracles. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 14(4), 583–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. O’Dea, J., & Maloney, D. (2000). Preventing eating and body image problems in children and adolescents using the health promoting schools’ framework. The Journal of School Health, 70(1), 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. O’Grady, A. (2016). “Always in the process of becoming” (Freire, 1998) how five early career Drama teachers build their worlds through language and discourse. Unpublished thesis, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
  26. O’Toole, J. (2002). Drama: The productive pedagogy. Critical Studies in Education, 43(2), 39–52.Google Scholar
  27. Sardar, Z. (2010). Welcome to postnormal times. Futures, 42(5), 435–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Triggs, G. (2018). Speaking up. Carlton: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Australia: Act No. 52 of 1975, Racial Discrimination Act 1975. (1975, June 11). Available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/4a7aa31d2.html. Accessed 20 Aug 2019.
  30. Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986.Google Scholar
  31. Sex Discrimination Act 1984.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations