Advertisement

Development, Dominance, and Communication

  • Mohan DuttaEmail author
Chapter
  • 4 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Communication for Social Change book series (PSCSC)

Abstract

Chapter  2 explores the thread of communication for social change in the dominant tradition. It explores the interplays of power in the theorization and practices of communication for social change, attending to the meanings that are foregrounded in the reproduction of colonial and capitalist interests. The intertwined relationship between development communication and Cold War politics forms the backdrop within which hegemonic meanings of communication for social change emerge. The active framing of communication for social change in individualized logics of behavior change erases the questions of structural transformation that are central to communication for social change. The chapter wraps up with attention to the logics of the free market that are embedded in social change communication.

References

  1. Amadae, S. M. (2003). Rationalizing capitalist democracy: The cold war origins of rational choice liberalism. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baaz, M. E. (2005). The paternalism of partnership: A postcolonial reading of identity in development aid. Zed Books.Google Scholar
  3. Bah, U. (2008). Daniel Lerner, Cold War propaganda and US development communication research: An historical critique. Journal of Third World Studies, 25(1), 183.Google Scholar
  4. Biglaiser, G. (2002). The internationalization of Chicago’s economics in Latin America. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 50(2), 269–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buxton, W. J. (1994). From radio research to communications intelligence: Rockefeller philanthropy, communications specialists, and the American intelligence community. In S. Brooks & A. Ganon (Eds.), The political influence of ideas: Policy communities and social scientists. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  6. Cammack, P. (2004). What the World Bank means by poverty reduction, and why it matters. New Political Economy, 9(2), 189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cox, R. (1997). Private interests and US foreign policy in Haiti and the Caribbean Basin. In Contested social orders and international politics (Vol. 187). Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Crush, J. (1995). Power of development. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dutta, M. J. (2004a). Poverty, structural barriers, and health: A Santali narrative of health communication. Qualitative Health Research, 14(8), 1107–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dutta, M. J. (2004b). The unheard voices of Santalis: Communicating about health from the margins of India. Communication Theory, 14(3), 237–263.Google Scholar
  11. Dutta, M. J. (2006a). Theoretical approaches to entertainment education campaigns: A subaltern critique. Health Communication, 20(3), 221–231.Google Scholar
  12. Dutta, M. J. (2006b). US public diplomacy in the Middle East: A critical cultural approach. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 30(2), 102–124.Google Scholar
  13. Dutta, M. J. (2010). The critical cultural turn in health communication: Reflexivity, solidarity, and praxis. Health Communication, 25(6–7), 534–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dutta, M. J. (2012a). Culture-centered approach to social change communication: Structure, culture and agency. In S. Melkote (Ed.), Development communication in directed social change (pp. 53–79). Singapore: AMIC.Google Scholar
  15. Dutta, M. J. (2012b). Voices of resistance: Communication and social change. Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Dutta-Bergman, M. J. (2006). US public diplomacy in the Middle East: A critical cultural approach. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 30(2), 102–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ehrlich, P. R. (1968). The population bomb (Vol. 68). New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  18. Escobar, A. (2011). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Fair, J. E., & Shah, H. (1997). Continuities and discontinuities in communication and development research since 1958. Journal of International Communication, 4(2), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Farmer, P. (2006). The uses of Haiti. Common Courage Press.Google Scholar
  21. Field Notes. (2015). Notes from ethnographic fieldwork: Mohan Dutta. Center for Culture-centered Approach to Research and Evaluation (CARE).Google Scholar
  22. Gilman, N. (2003). Mandarins of the future: Modernization theory in Cold War America. JHU Press.Google Scholar
  23. Giroux, H. A. (2008). Beyond the biopolitics of disposability: rethinking neoliberalism in the New Gilded Age. Social Identities, 14(5), 587–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Glander, T. (1999). Origins of mass communications research during the American Cold War: Educational effects and contemporary implications. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haiti Info. (1995, September). Neoliberalism in Haiti: The case of rice. Haiti Info, Vol. 3, no. 24. Retrieved from http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/43a/210.html
  26. Harvey, D. (2005). From globalization to the new imperialism. In Critical globalization studies (pp. 91–100). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  27. Henriques, D. B. (1993, October 11). A rice exporter’s cozy link to U.S. agency reaps profit. New York Times.Google Scholar
  28. Katz, D. E., Cartwright, D. E., Eldersveld, S. E., & Lee, A. M. E. (1954). Public opinion and propaganda. New York, NY: The Dryden Press.Google Scholar
  29. Klarreich, K., Polman, L. (2012). The NGO republic of Haiti. The Nation. Retrieved from https://www.thenation.com/article/ngo-republic-haiti/
  30. Laswell, H. (1948). The structure and function of communication and society: The communication of ideas (pp. 203–243). New York: Institute for Religious and Social Studies.Google Scholar
  31. Latham, M. E. (2000). Modernization as ideology: American social science and “nation building” in the Kennedy era. University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  32. Latham, M. E. (2010). The right kind of revolution: Modernization, development, and US foreign policy from the Cold War to the present. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Knupfer, G. (1945). Communications research and international cooperation. The science of man in the world crisis (pp. 465–495).Google Scholar
  34. Lerner, D. (1958). The passing of traditional society: Modernizing the Middle East. Free Press.Google Scholar
  35. Lerner, D. (1967). Comparative analysis of processes of modernization. In The city in modern Africa (pp. 1, 38).Google Scholar
  36. Lerner, D. (1968). Modernization: social aspects. In International encyclopedia of the social sciences (Vol. 10, pp. 386–395).Google Scholar
  37. Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York: Simon & Schuster Inc.Google Scholar
  38. Losurdo, D. (2014). Liberalism: A counter-history. Verso Trade.Google Scholar
  39. McAnany, E. G. (2012). Social Entrepreneurship and Communication for Development and Social Change. Nordicom Review, 33(Special Issue), 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Melkote, S. R. (1991). Communication for development in the Third World: Theory and practice. SAGE Publications Pvt. Limited.Google Scholar
  41. Melkote, S. R., & Steeves, H. L. (2001). Communication for development in the Third World: Theory and practice for empowerment. Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Montesquieu, C. (1989). Montesquieu: The spirit of the laws. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Mullin, L. (2011). How USAID undermines democracy in Haiti. Retrieved from https://www.pambazuka.org/governance/how-usaid-undermines-democracy-haiti
  44. Murphy, M. (2004). Uncertain exposures and the privilege of imperception: activist scientists and race at the US Environmental Protection Agency. Osiris, 19, 266–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Newman, J. (2017). The politics of expertise: Neoliberalism, governance and the practice of politics. In Assembling neoliberalism (pp. 87–105). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Obregon, R., & Tufte, T. (2017). Communication, social movements, and collective action: Toward a new research agenda in communication for development and social change. Journal of Communication, 67(5), 635–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Padel, F., & Das, S. (2010). Cultural genocide and the rhetoric of sustainable mining in East India. Contemporary South Asia, 18(3), 333–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Parmar, I. (2015). The “Big 3” foundations and American global power. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 74(4), 676–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Peet, R. (2003). Unholy trinity: The IMF, World Bank and WTO. Zed Books.Google Scholar
  50. Peet, R., & Hartwick, E. (2015). Theories of development: Contentions, arguments, alternatives. Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
  51. Prince, R. (2017). Assuming everything, except responsibility: On blaming economists for neoliberalism. In Assembling neoliberalism (pp. 45–65). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reid-Henry, S. (2012). U.S. economist Walt Rostow and his influence on post-1945 development. The Guardian. Retrieved July 4, 2017, from https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2012/oct/08/us-economist-walt-rostow-development
  53. Rogers, E. M. (1962, 1971, 1973, 1983). Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  54. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  55. Rostow, W. W. (1960). The stages of growth: A non-communist manifesto (pp. 4–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Ryan, B., & Gross, N. C. (1943). The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural Sociology, 8(1), 15.Google Scholar
  57. Samarajiwa, R. (1987). The murky beginnings of the communication and development field: Voice of America and the passing of traditional society. In Rethinking development communication (pp. 3–19).Google Scholar
  58. Schramm, W. (1964). Mass media and national development: The role of information in the developing countries (Vol. 25). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Schramm, W., & Lerner, D. (Eds.). (1976). Communication and change, the last ten years—And the next. Honolulu: University press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
  60. Schudson, M. (2008). The “Lippmann-Dewey debate” and the invention of Walter Lippmann as an anti-democrat 1985–1996. International Journal of Communication, 2, 12.Google Scholar
  61. Seigel, M. (2018). Violence work: State power and the limits of police. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Shah, H. (2011). The production of modernization: Daniel Lerner, mass media, and the passing of traditional society. Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Simpson, C. (1994). Science of coercion: Communication research & psychological warfare, 1945–1960. Open Road Media.Google Scholar
  64. Stevenson, J. (2017). The cold warrior who never apologized. The New York Times. Retrieved August 15, 2017, from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/08/opinion/vietnam-walt-rostow.html?mcubz=3
  65. Thomas, P., & Van de Fliert, E. (2014). Interrogating the theory and practice of communication for social change: The basis for a renewal. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Trudel, D. (2017). Revisiting the origins of communication research: Walter Lippmann’s World War II adventure in propaganda and psychological warfare. International Journal of Communication, 11, 3721–3739.Google Scholar
  67. USAID. (1998). Making a world of difference one family at a time. Global Issues, 3, 33–35.Google Scholar
  68. Waisbord, S. (2001). Family tree of theories, methodologies and strategies in development communication. Rockefeller Foundation, 99.Google Scholar
  69. Weisbrot, M. (2011). Haiti’s election: A travesty of democracy. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/tyqog0
  70. Weisbrot, M. (2015). Failed: What the “experts” got wrong about the global economy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Wilson, K. (2012). Race, racism and development: Interrogating history, discourse and practice. Zed Books Ltd.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Culture-centered Approach to Research & Evaluation (CARE), School of Communication, Journalism & MarketingMassey UniversityPalmerston NorthNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations