Advertisement

Law and Political-Military Strategy: The Importance of Legal Advice in the Decision to Deploy the Canadian Armed Forces

  • Alexander Bolt
Chapter
Part of the Canada and International Affairs book series (CIAF)

Abstract

Consideration of relevant political and military operational factors is central to a decision to deploy the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) on a military mission abroad, but deployments also present strategic legal risk. This chapter presents and briefly discusses two classes of legal issues that must be identified and resolved in Canadian deployment decisions. First, and accepting that the default rule in international law is that military interference in foreign states is illegal, under what international law authority would Canada deploy troops to the territory of another state? The three most commonly relied upon exceptions to the general rule are raised. Second, if and when the military is deployed, what international law will apply to its personnel and operations? The applicability of international human rights law and the law of armed conflict—or humanitarian law—is discussed. This second issue is in turn connected to the key question of whether Canada, through the conduct of its anticipated operations, might become a party to an armed conflict. Ultimately, are deployed Canadians at risk of being considered lawful targets? And what are the legal factors that might influence the choice of military tactics?

References

  1. Bolt, Alexander. 2008. The Crown Prerogative in Canada and its Use in the Context of International Military Deployments. Office of the Judge Advocate General Strategic Legal Paper Series, no 2. Google Scholar
  2. Department of National Defence. 1985. National Defence Act. Laws-lois.justice.gc.ca. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/N-5/.
  3. Department of National Defence. 2017. Strong, Secure, Engaged. Ottawa: Supply and Services.Google Scholar
  4. Fleck, Dieter. 2008. The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Heintschel von Heinegg, Wolff. 2007. Benevolent Third States in International Armed Conflicts: the Myth of the Irrelevance of the Law of Neutrality. In International Law and Armed Conflict: Exploring the Faultlines, vol. 15, Chapter 20, 543–568. Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Google Scholar
  6. International Committee of the Red Cross. 1899. Declaration (IV, 3) Concerning Expanding Bullets. The Hague. ihl-databases.icrc.org. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/ihl/INTRO/170?OpenDocument.
  7. International Committee of the Red Cross. 1949a. Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field (First Geneva Convention). 75 UNTS 31. ihl-databases.icrc.org. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/7c4d08d9b287a42141256739003e636b/44072487ec4c2131c125641e004a9977.
  8. International Committee of the Red Cross. 1949b. Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War (Fourth Geneva Convention). 75 UNTS 287. ihl-databases.icrc.org. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/ihl/385ec082b509e76c41256739003e636d/6756482d86146898c125641e004aa3c5.
  9. International Committee of the Red Cross. 1949c. Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War (Third Geneva Convention). 75 UNTS 135. ihl-databases.icrc.org. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/7c4d08d9b287a42141256739003e63bb/6fef854a3517b75ac125641e004a9e68.
  10. International Committee of the Red Cross. 1977a. Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I). 1125 UNTS 3. ihl-databases.icrc.org. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/ihl/INTRO/470.
  11. International Committee of the Red Cross. 1977b. Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II). 1125 UNTS 609. ihl-databases.icrc.org. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/ihl/INTRO/475?OpenDocument.
  12. International Committee of the Red Cross. 1987. Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I) Commentary of 1987. ihl-databases.icrc.org. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/ihl/COM/470-750001?OpenDocument.
  13. International Court of Justice. 1986. Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America). icj-cij.org. https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/70/070-19860627-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf.
  14. International Court of Justice. 1996. Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons. icj-cij.org. https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/95/095-19960708-ADV-01-00-EN.pdf.
  15. International Court of Justice. 2004. Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. un.org. https://www.un.org/unispal/document/icj-advisory-opinion-on-the-legal-consequences-of-the-construction-of-a-wall-in-the-opt-icj-document/.
  16. International Court of Justice. 2005. Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), 168.Google Scholar
  17. International Criminal Court. 2010. The Prosecutor v. Bahar Idriss Abu Garda. ICC-02/05-02/09, Decision on the Confirmation of Charges.Google Scholar
  18. International Criminal Court. 2011. The Prosecutor v. Abdallah Banda Abakaer Nourain and Saleh Mohammed Jerbo Jamus. ICC-02/05-03/09, Corrigendum of the Decision on the Confirmation of Charges.Google Scholar
  19. Juan Carlos Abella v. Argentina. 1997. Case 11.137. hrlibrary.umn.edu. http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/cases/1997/argentina55-97a.html.
  20. Kittrie, Ordre F. 2016. Lawfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Krulak, Charles. 1999. The Strategic Corporal: Leadership in the Three Block War. Marines Corps Gazette 83 (1): 18–23. Google Scholar
  22. Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. 1992. Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction. Treaties.un.org. https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=IND&mtdsg_no=XXVI-3&chapter=26&clang=_en.
  23. Provost, René. 2002. International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gen. Rogers, A. P. V. 2004. Law on the Battlefield, 2nd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Schmitt, Michael N. 2007. Direct Participation in Hostilities and 21st Century Armed Conflict. Melbourne Journal of International Law 8 (2): 443.Google Scholar
  26. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization. 1949. The North Atlantic Treaty. Nato.int. https://www.nato.int/cps/ie/natohq/official_texts_17120.htm.
  27. United Kingdom Ministry of Defence. 2004. The Manual of the Law of Armed Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. United Nations. 1945. Charter of the United Nations. un.org. http://www.un.org/en/charter-united-nations/.
  29. United Nations General Assembly. 2002. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Legal.un.org. http://legal.un.org/icc/statute/99_corr/cstatute.htm.
  30. United Nations Security Council. 2001. Letter from Canada’s Chargé d’affaires a.i. at the United Nations to the President of the Security Council. doc S/2001/1005. documents-dds-ny.un.org. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N01/600/48/pdf/N0160048.pdf?OpenElement.
  31. United Nations Security Council. 2015. Letter from Canada’s Chargé d’affaires a.i. at the United Nations to the President of the Security Council. doc S/2015/221. Justsecrutiy.org. https://www.justsecurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Canada-Article-51-Letter-Syria-03312015.pdf.
  32. Watkin, Kenneth. 2006. Humanitarian Law and 21st-Century Conflict: Three Block Wars, Terrorism, and Complex Security Situations. In Testing the Boundaries of International Humanitarian Law, ed. S.C. Breau and A. Jachec-Neale. London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander Bolt
    • 1
  1. 1.Canadian Armed ForcesOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations