The Importance of School from an International Perspective: What Do Children in General and Children in Vulnerable Situations Say?

  • Carme MontserratEmail author
  • Ferran Casas
  • Joan Llosada-Gistau
Part of the Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research book series (CHIR, volume 22)


To what extent does school experience affect the subjective wellbeing of children in different countries and contexts? What relationship can be established with children in care at school? In the framework of the Children’s Worlds Project, a representative sample of children from 18 countries (N = 21,508) provided opinions and evaluations regarding different domains of their lives, including school. Results showed that children (aged 12) who reported liking to attend school, feeling safety and not bullied, being satisfied with their school experience, marks, and relationships with classmates and treated fairly by teachers; scored significantly higher in subjective well-being (on the PWI scale) than children who evaluated these aspects of school life less positively. This pattern was clearly repeated in all 18 countries. On examining in greater depth whether they liked going to school, results showed that children from countries with high economies answered less positively than children from low-income and upper-middle economies, opening up the debate on what school actually means for children in different social contexts. A specific context analysed was that of children in care. A comparison between the general child population and the children in care in Spain (Catalonia) revealed, on the one hand, that children in care liked going to school more than the general child population. On the other hand, the impact of aspects of school life on subjective wellbeing was more notable in children in care, and differences between maximum and minimum scores were more marked. This would suggest that school is a highly sensitive area of these children’s lives and could be a great compensating factor or, conversely, a risk factor, with implications for policy-making and professional practices. The results of this study indicated that school (or what occurs in the school environment) gains greater importance in the lives of children in more vulnerable situations.


Children Subjective well-being International approach Children in care 



Children’s Worlds Project ( and the Generalitat de Catalunya (DGAIA).


  1. Ben-Arieh, A., Rees, G., & Dinisman, T. (Eds.). (2017). Children’s Well-being around the world: Findings from the Children’s Worlds (ISCWeB) project. Children and Youth Services Review, 80, 1–180.Google Scholar
  2. Bonal, X. (2016). Education, poverty and the ‘missing link’. The limits of human capital theory as a paradigm for poverty reduction. In K. Mundy, A. Green, R. Lingard, & A. Verger (Eds.), The handbook of global education policy (pp. 97–110). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carnoy, M. (2016). Educational policies in the face of globalization: Whither the nation state? In K. Mundy, A. Green, B. Lingard, & A. Verger (Eds.), The handbook of global education policy (pp. 27–42). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Casas, F. (2018). Introduction to the special section on children’s subjective well-being. Child Development. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Casas, F., & González, M. (2017). School: One world or two worlds? Children’s perspectives. Children and Youth Services Review, 80, 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cummins, R. A. (2013). Understanding the well-being of children and adolescents through homeostatic theory. In A. Ben-Arieh, F. Casas, I. Frønes, & J. E. Korbin (Eds.), Handbook of child well-being (pp. 635–662). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Cummins, R. A., & Lau, A. (2005). Manual: personal wellbeing index – School children, Cantonese translation (3rd edn., Resource document). Melbourne, Australia: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University.Google Scholar
  8. Jackson, S., & Cameron, C. (Eds.). (2014). Improving access to further and higher education for young people in public care. European policy and practice. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Llosada-Gistau, J., Casas, F., & Montserrat, C. (2017). What matters in for the subjective well-being of children in care? Child Indicators Research, 10(3), 735–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Montserrat, C., Casas, F., & Moura, J. (2015). Children’s subjective well-being in disadvantaged situations. In E. Fernández, A. Zeira, T. Vechiatto, & C. Canali (Eds.), Theoretical and Empirical Insights into Child and Family Poverty: Cross national perspectives (pp. 111–126). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. OECD. (2017). Education at a Glance 2017: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tarabini, A., & Bonal, X. (2016). Los principios de un sistema educativo que no deje a nadie atrás. Madrid, Spain: Save the Children.Google Scholar
  13. Tiliouine, H. (2014). School bullying victimisation and subjective well-being in Algeria. Child Indicators Research, 8(1), 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tomyn, A., Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M., Cummins, R., & Norrish, J. (2017). The validity of subjective wellbeing measurement for children: evidence using the PWI-SC. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(6), 1859–1875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. UNICEF. (2016). Fairness for Children: A league table of inequality in child well-being in rich countries (Innocenti Report Card 13). Florence, Italy: UNICEF.Google Scholar
  16. Wallander, J. L., & Koot, H. M. (2016). Quality of life in children: A critical examination of concepts, approaches, issues, and future directions. Clinical Psychology Review, 45, 131–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  18. World Bank. (2018). World Development Report 2018: Learning to realize education’s promise. Washington, DC: World Bank. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carme Montserrat
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ferran Casas
    • 1
  • Joan Llosada-Gistau
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Institute on Quality of LifeUniversity of GironaGironaSpain

Personalised recommendations