Advertisement

Probabilistic Evaluation of the Stability in Earned Value Management Forecasting on Topologically Diverse Project Networks

  • V. H. LadeedaEmail author
  • Jacob Jeevan
Conference paper
  • 176 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 46)

Abstract

“When will the project performance indices in my project become stable?” is an ever interesting fundamental question in earned value management (EVM) but mostly unresolved as well, especially for the highly dynamic construction projects which call for frequent updating and rescheduling. The stability of the performance indices assures the credibility of EVM as an effective tool to analyse the project performances as well as to forecast the requirements. This paper presents an assessment of time and cost performance stability in EVM based on an analytical stability simulation model which evaluates the probability of the stable project performance indices during the project execution for topologically diverse construction project networks. The model is used to identify the effects of percentage completion, network topology as well as its compounding effects on the stability of EVM forecasting and topology–stability relations were developed for schedule performances. Finally, the performance indices are compared for the stability behaviour.

Keywords

Earned value management Cost performance index Schedule performance indices Network topology Stability simulation model Stability analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Schnaars S (1984) Situational factors affecting forecast accuracy. J Market Res 21(3):290–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Payne K (1990) An investigation of the stability of the cost performance index. Technical Rep., Air Force Institute of Technology, WrightPatterson AFB, OHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Christensen D, Heise S (1993) Cost performance index stability. Nat Contract Manage J 25:7–15Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zwikael O, Globerson S, Tzvi R (2000) Evaluation of models for forecasting the final cost of a project. Project Manage J 31:53–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Christensen D, Templin C (2002) EAC evaluation methods: do they still work? Acquis Rev Q 9:105–116Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Henderson K, Zwikael O (2008) Does project performance stability exist? A re-examination of CPI and evaluation of SPIðtÞ stability. CrossTalk 21:7–13Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wauters M, Vanhoucke M (2014) Study of the stability of earned value management forecasting. J Constr Eng Manag 141(1992):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim B (2015 May) Probabilistic evaluation of cost performance stability in earned value management. J Manag Eng 32:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000383Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Koning P, Vanhoucke M (2016) Stability of earned value do project characteristics influence the stability moment of the cost and schedule performance index. J Mod Proj ManagGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    PMI (Project Management Institute) (2013) A guide to the project management body of knowledge, 5th edn. Newton Square, PAGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vanhoucke M (2009) Measuring time—improving project performance using earned value management, vol 136. International series in operations research and management science. Springer, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringMar Athanasius College of EngineeringKothamangalamIndia

Personalised recommendations