Advertisement

Evaluation of Structural Response of Ground Supported Cylindrical Water Tanks to Static and Harmonic Loading

  • Shilja Sureshkumar
  • Asha JosephEmail author
Conference paper
  • 183 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 46)

Abstract

Earthquake forces and hydrodynamic pressure are important parameters to be considered in the design of water tanks. In this study, response of ground supported cylindrical water tanks were studied under static and harmonic loading at different water heights and different aspect ratios using finite element software ANSYS. The main objective is to determine the influence of soil structure interaction on dynamic response of water tanks. Soil is modelled as three layers consist of clayey gravel, silty sand and hard rock. It is concluded that, soil structure interaction amplify response of water tanks under static and harmonic loading.

Keywords

Fluid structure interaction (FSI) Soil structure interaction (SSI) Harmonic loading Hydrostatic pressure Aspect ratio 

References

  1. 1.
    Chaduvulaa U, Patela D et al (2013) Fluid-structure-soil interaction effect on seismic behaviour of elevated water tanks. Procedia Eng 51:84–91Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Joseph A, Joseph G (2016) Response of ground supported cylindrical water tanks to harmonic loading. Civ Eng Urb Plan Int J (CiVEJ) 3(2):183–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jain Sudhir K, Sameer US (1990) Seismic design of frame staging for elevated water tank. In: Ninth symposium on earthquake engineering, vol 1, pp 14–16Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    George W (1963) Housner, the dynamic behaviour of water tank. Bull Seismol Soc Am 53:381–387Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sezen H, Livaoglu et al (2008) Dynamic analysis and seismic performance evaluation of above ground liquid-containing tanks. Eng Struct 30(3):794–803Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Waghmare MV, Madhekar SN (2013) Behaviour of elevated water tank under sloshing effect. Int J Adv Technol Civ Eng 2:51–54Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dona Rose KJ, Sreekumar M et al (2015) A study of overhead water tanks subjected to dynamic loads. Int J Eng Trends Technol 344–348Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anumod AS et al (2014) Finite element analysis of steel storage tank under seismic load. Int J Eng Res Appl (IJERA) 47–54Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Veletsos AS, Meek JW, (1974) Dynamic behaviour of building-foundation systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 3(2):121-138Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anestis S, Veletsos et al (1992) Dynamic response of flexibility supported liquid-storage tanks. J Struct Eng-ASCE 118:264–283Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Medhat A, Haroun et al (1992) Parametric study of seismic soil-tank interaction In: Horizontal excitation. J Struct Eng-ASCE 118:783–797Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Livaoglu R (2008) Investigation of seismic behaviour of fluid-rectangular tank-soil/foundation systems in frequency domain. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 28(2):132–146Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Livaoglu R, Dogangun A (2007) Effect of foundation embedment on seismic behaviour of elevated tanks considering fluid–structure-soil interaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27(9):855–863Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hirde S, Hedaoo M (2011) Seismic performance of elevated water tanks. Int J Adv Eng Res Stud 1:78–87Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringAlbertian Institute of Science and TechnologyKalamasseryIndia
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringFederal Institute of Science and TechnologyAngamaly, KochiIndia

Personalised recommendations