Advertisement

A Study on Effect of Shear Connectors in the Structural Performance of Steel-Concrete-Steel Sandwich Shear Walls

  • Reenu EldhoseEmail author
  • Reshma Prasad
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 46)

Abstract

Steel-concrete-steel (SCS) shear wall consist of two steel face plates and a sandwiched concrete core which are bonded together by mechanical shear connectors to form an integral unit to resist external loads. The steel face plates were connected together using tie rods and to the infill concrete using headed studs respectively. The advantages of the SCS Sandwich structure over the traditional reinforced concrete are that the external steel skin plates act as the permanent formwork and flexural reinforcement and offer water proofing protections. This paper presents a robust finite element model developed in ANSYS Workbench for Nonlinear cyclic analysis of the SCS walls. Rectangular SCS shear walls with an aspect ratio of 1.0 were modeled and analysed under displacement-controlled, in-plane cyclic loading. A parametric study was carried out to investigate the effects of different shear connector configurations and push over analysis was performed to determine the best connector configuration. A new structural topology has been introduced for better performance.

Keywords

Steel-concrete-steel (SCS) sandwich shear wall Shear connectors Nonlinear cyclic analysis Push over analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Yan J-B, Wang X-T, Wang Tao (2018) Compressive behaviour of normal weight concrete confined by the steel face plates in SCS sandwich wall. Constr Build Mater 171:437–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Foundoukos N, Chapman JC (2008) Finite element analysis of steel–concrete–steel sandwich beams. J Constr Steel Res 64:947–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sohel KMA, Liewb JYR, Kohb CG (2015) Numerical modelling of lightweight steel-concrete-steel sandwich composite beams subjected to impact. Thin-Walled Struct 94:135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liew JYR, Yan J-B, Huang Z-Y (2017) Steel-concrete-steel sandwich composite structures-recent innovations. J Constr Steel Res 130:202–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nguyen NH, Whittaker AS (2017) Numerical modelling of steel-plate concrete composite shear walls. Eng Struct 150:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Epackachi S, Whittaker AS, Varma AH, Kurt EG (2015) Finite element modeling of steel-plate concrete composite wall piers. Eng Struct 100:369–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Epackachi S, Nguyen NH, Kurt EG, Whittaker AS, Varma AH (2014) In-plane seismic behavior of rectangular steel-plate composite wall piers. ASCEGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bowerman H, Chapman JC (2015) Bi-steel steel-concrete-steel sandwich construction. In: Composite construction in steel and concrete IV, ASCEGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringFederal Institute of Science and TechnologyAngamaly, KochiIndia

Personalised recommendations