Advertisement

Onomatopoeia and Translation: A Corpus Approach

  • Ryoko SasamotoEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Sound book series (PASTS)

Abstract

Unlike previous chapters, this chapter focuses on the translation of onomatopoeia. Its main aim is to show whether onomatopoeia is indeed difficult to translate and poses a challenge for translators, a commonly accepted view of onomatopoeia in Translation Studies. To this end, this study conducts a corpus-based analysis using the parallel corpus built with bilingual data from Cookpad. Findings from the corpus analysis show that the translation of onomatopoeia is in fact stable and straightforward, contrary to the assumption of previous studies. Furthermore, a close examination of the omission of onomatopoeia from translation reveals that onomatopoeia in these cases was not simply omitted for being too difficult to translate, but to achieve optimal relevance. The nature of onomatopoeia means that its translation is highly context bound and, as such, there seem to be limited established techniques. However, the careful examination of onomatopoeia and translation shows that the lack of direct equivalence does not necessarily result in difficulties in translation, and that it is the consideration of relevance that determines why and how the effect of onomatopoeia is translated.

Bibliography

  1. Baker, Mona. 1992. In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartashova, Olga A., and Anton E. Sichinskiy. 2014. Japanese–English Onomatopoeic and Mimetic Parallels: The Problem of Translatability. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences 2: 222–229.Google Scholar
  3. Casas-Tost, Helena. 2014. Translating Onomatopoeia from Chinese into Spanish: A Corpus-Based Analysis. Perspectives 22 (1): 39–55.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2012.712144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dimitriu, Rodica. 2004. Omission in Translation. Perspectives 12 (3): 163–175.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2004.9961499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Edström, Bert. 1989. Japanese Onomatopoetic Words: A Research Note. Orientaliska Studier 65: 35–52.Google Scholar
  6. Flyxe, Martin. 2002. Translation of Japanese Onomatopoeia Into Swedish (with Focus on Lexicalization). Africa & Asia 2: 54–73.Google Scholar
  7. Harashima, Jun, Michiaki Ariga, Kenta Murata, and Masayuki Ioki. 2016. A Large-Scale Recipe and Meal Data Collection as Infrastructure for Food Research. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 2455–2459. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-Large-scale-Recipe-and-Meal-Data-Collection-as-Harashima-Ariga/8660210d71d56c480bd568f49fcf5243ec80a84f.
  8. Hayase, Mitsuaki. 1978. Characteristics of Japanese Onomatopoeia Observed Through the English Translation. Kanssai Gaikokugodaigaku Kenkyu Ronshu 28: 117–127.Google Scholar
  9. Inose, Hiroko. 2008. Translating Japanese onomatopoeia and mimetic words. In Translation Research Projects, ed. Anthony Pym and Alexander Perekrestenko, vol. 1, 97–116. Tarragona: Intercultural Studies Group.Google Scholar
  10. Kubo, Atsuko. 1995. Miyazawa Kenji No Onomatope No Sekai [The World of Onomatopoeia in Miyazawa Kenji’s Work]. Kobe Kaisei Review 130 (34): 17–30.Google Scholar
  11. Marshall, Shelly. 2014. Night on the Milky Way Railroad (Kindle Edition). Los Gatos: Smashwords.Google Scholar
  12. Minashima, Hiroshi. 2004. Nihhongo No Onomatope [Onomatopoeia in Japanese]. Fukui Daigaku Kyoiku Chiiki Kagakubu Kiyou 60: 97–115.Google Scholar
  13. Molina, Lucia. 2006. El Otoño Del Pingüino. Análisis Descriptivo de La Traducción de Los Culturemas. Castelló de la Plana: Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I.Google Scholar
  14. Murakami, Haruki. 1999. Suputoniku no Koibito [Sputnik Sweeaheart]. Tokyo: Kodansha.Google Scholar
  15. Ono, Masahiro. 2007. Nihongo Onomatope Jiten [Japanese Onomatopoeia Dictionary]. Tokyo: Shogakukan Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Sato, Eriko. 2017. Translanguaging in Translation: Evidence from Japanese Mimetics. International Journal of Linguistics and Communication. 5.  https://doi.org/10.15640/ijlc.v5n1a2.
  17. Takeuchi, K. 1998. Schôchôgo no honyaku o meguru futatsuno mondai [Two Issues on the Translation of Symbolic Expressions]. Musashi daigaku jinbungakkai zasshi 24 (4): 47–77.Google Scholar
  18. Tamori, Ikuhiro, and Lawrence Clifford Schourup. 1999. Onomatope: Keitai-to Imi [Onomatopoeia: Form and Meaning]. Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan.Google Scholar
  19. Toury, Gideon. 1995. Descriptive Translation Studies – And Beyond. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ———. 2004. Los Estudios Descriptivos de Traducción y Más Allá. Metodología de La Investigación En Estudios de Traducción. Madrid: Catedra. https://www.catedra.com/libro.php?codigo_comercial=130064.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SALISDublin City University SALISDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations