Experiencing Aging: Analogue Versus Virtual

  • Deana McDonaghEmail author
  • Debra Reardanz
Part of the Intelligent Systems Reference Library book series (ISRL, volume 167)


The aim of this chapter is to discuss and compare the impact of an aging suit compared to the virtual experience of aging with the goal of expanding a person’s understanding and felt experience of aging. The authors are both immersed within the area of aging and disability, with one focusing on physical simulations, while the other has adopted virtual simulations to support the development of empathic understanding for others. This chapter shares the experience of each author as they immerse themselves into the simulation currently favoured by the other, so that they can compare both the physical and the virtual from the perspective of the felt experience. Felt experience refers to the personal understanding gained when experiencing the experience of another person’s experience. As our demographics are shifting towards a population of elders, and disability is no longer perceived to be a barrier to quality of life, it becomes the responsibility of developers of services and products to ensure that they understand real people, to ensure that real solutions are offered. On a cognitive level the average person can begin to appreciate how aging and disability could impact another person, however, the authors would profess that until you have dived deeper into that person’s reality (physically or virtually) your understanding is limited. It is argued that experiencing the experience of another person triggers reflection, repositioning of worldviews and a deeper sensitivity than would have been possible before the physical and/or virtual experience. While this approach does not replace the process of aging for individuals, it does provide a valuable tool in the researcher’s blended research tool kit.


Experience Empathy Aging End of life Gerontology suit Virtual reality 


  1. 1.
    Pullen, G.: Design Meets Disability. MIT, Cambridge (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Radford University: Exercises in Empathy Highlight School of Nursing’s Immersion Week Activities. (2018). Accessed 21 Jan 2019
  3. 3.
    Höök, K.: Designing with the Body: Somaesthetic Interaction Design. MIT, Cambridge (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nussbaum, M.: Upheaval of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    de Vignemont, R., Singer, R.: The empathic brain: how, when and why? Trends Cogn. Sci. 10(10), 435–441 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Coughlin, J.F.: The Longevity Economy: Unlocking the Fastest-Growing Most Misunderstood Market. Hachette Book Group, New York (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Loe, M.: Aging Our Way: Independent Elders, Independent Lives. Oxford University Press, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Virtual Reality Software: Embodied Labs.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Senior Suit.
  13. 13.
    McDonagh, D.: Design students foreseeing the unforeseeable: practice-based empathic research methods. Int. J. Educ. Art. 11(3), 421–431 (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Woodcock, A., McDonagh, D., Osmond, J.: Developing empathy for older users in undergraduate design students. Des. Technol. Educ. Int. J. 23(2), 24–39 (2018)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Washington, E., Shaw, C.: The Effects of a VR Intervention on Career Interest, Empathy, Communication Skills and Learning with 2nd Year Medical Students. (2018)

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Art + DesignUniversity of IllinoisUrbana ChampaignUSA
  2. 2.Clark-Lindsey Retirement VillageUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations