Advertisement

The Dialectics Between “Race to the Top” and “Back to Basics”: Metaphors on Taiwan Higher Education Reforms Between 2006 and 2017

  • (Kent) Sheng Yao Cheng
Chapter
Part of the International and Development Education book series (INTDE)

Abstract

Along with the increase of global competition in the field of higher education (HE) since the year 2000, the Taiwanese government has initiated a series of educational reforms in order to face the “Olympic Games” in HE. In 2006, the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan began the first Five-Year and Fifty-Billion-NTD Project, subsequently called the Race to the World-Class University Project, providing extra financial support to help top universities in Taiwan meet the global criteria of a world-class university. After two stages of the project (2006–2016), the MOE in Taiwan received lots of criticism and demands for changes related to instruction, internationalization, the public sphere, local connections, and the homogenization of higher education institutions (HEIs). To address these critiques, the Taiwanese government released the newest HE initiative, called Higher Education Rooted Project in 2017 with hopes to improve the public sphere of HE, encourage instructional innovation, further develop various special fields within universities, and take the University Social Responsibilities. To interpret the HE changes in Taiwan during the last two decades, the author of this chapter borrows two concepts from US educational reforms, Race to the Top in 2009 and Back to Basics in the 1980s, as two metaphors to outline the dialectics between global competition and local demands. Moreover, the author highlights the debates between the impact factor and the social impact factor of HE changes in Taiwan. Finally, the author provides some observations on the paradigm shift of higher education reforms in Taiwan and its possible implications for other Asian-Pacific countries.

References

  1. Barak, R.J., and C.R. Kniker. 2002. Benchmarking by State Higher Education Boards. In Using Benchmarking to Inform Practice in Higher Education, ed. B.E. Bender and J.H. Schuh, 93–102. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  2. Brodinsky, B. 1977. Defining the Basics of American Education. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.Google Scholar
  3. Carnoy, M. 2000. Globalization and Educational Reform. In Globalization and Education, ed. N. Stromquist and K. Monkman, 43–62. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  4. Chen, P.C. 2002. Higher Education Reform in Taiwan. Los Angeles: Center for International and Development.Google Scholar
  5. Cheng, S. 2009. Quality Assurance in Higher Education: The Taiwan Experience. In Higher Education in Asia/Pacific, ed. Terance W. Bigalke and Deane E. Neubauer, 133–148. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng, S. 2016. A Study on the Educational Policies on Afterschool Programs and Educational Equity in Taiwan. In Chinese Education Models in a Global Age, ed. Chuing Chou and Jonathan Spangler, 65–75. Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng, S. 2017. The Dialectics Between “Race to the Top” and “Back to the Basics”: Paradigm Shifts on Taiwan Higher Education Reforms. Paper presented at the Asian Pacific Higher Education Senior Seminar, Lingnan University, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  8. Common Core State Standard (CCSS) (2010).Google Scholar
  9. Douglass, J.A. 2016. The New Flagship University: Changing the Paradigm from Global Ranking to National Relevancy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) (1965).Google Scholar
  11. Every Student Succeed Act (ESSA) (2015).Google Scholar
  12. Frazer, M. 1992. Quality Assurance in Higher Education. In Quality Assurance in Higher Education, ed. A. Craft, 9–25. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  13. Green, A. 1997. Education, Globalization, and the Nation State. New York: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hativa, N. 2000. What Makes Good Teaching. In Teaching for Effective Learning in Higher Education, ed. N. Hativa, 9–24. London: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hayes, D., and R. Wynyard. 2002. Introduction. In The McDonaldization of Higher Education, ed. D. Haynes and R. Wynyard, 1–18. London: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
  16. HEEACT. 2007. 2006 Higher Education Evaluation Report. Taipei: HEEACT.Google Scholar
  17. Henkel, M. 2000. Identity in Academia. In Academic Identities and Policy Change in Higher Education, ed. M. Henkel, 13–25. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  18. Huang, F.T. 2018. Higher Education Financing in Japan: Trends and Challenges. International Journal of Educational Development 58: 106–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hur, J.Y., and D. Bessey. 2013. A Comparison of Higher Education Reform in South Korea and Germany. Asia Pacific Education Review 14 (2): 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jacob, W.J., K.H. Mo, S.Y. Cheng, and W. Xiong. 2018. Changes in Chinese Higher Education: Financial Trends in China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. International Journal of Educational Development 58: 64–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jung, H., M.A. Pirog, and S.K. Lee. 2016. The Long-Run Labour Market Effects of Expanding Access to Higher Education in South Korea. Journal of International Development 28 (6): 974–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kerr, C. 1993. The Uses of the University. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lu, M. 2006. Opening Remarks. Paper presented at the Conference on University Classification, Ranking, and Quality Assurance, Tamkang University, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  24. MOE. 2017. Higher Education Rooted (Draft Version). Taipei: Ministry of Education (MOE).Google Scholar
  25. MOE. 2018. Higher Education Rooted. Taipei: Ministry of Education (MOE).Google Scholar
  26. National Center for Education Statistics. 2017. Financial Literacy of 15-Year-Olds: Results from PISA 2015. Washington, DC: NCES.Google Scholar
  27. Newman, J. 1925. The Idea of a University. London: Library of Alexandria.Google Scholar
  28. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001(NCLB) (2002).Google Scholar
  29. Nozaki, Y. 2017. The Effects of Higher Education on Childrearing Fertility Behavior in Japan. International Journal of Social Economics 44 (5): 653–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. OECD. 2014. New Insights from TALIS 2013: Teaching and Learning in Primary and Upper Secondary Education. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Race to the Top (RTT) (2009).Google Scholar
  32. Yang, S.K., and S.Y. Cheng. 2011. Social Justice, Equal Access, and Stratification of Higher Education in Taiwan. In Access, Equity, and Capacity in Asia-Pacific Higher Education, ed. Deane E. Neubauer and Yoshiro Tanaka, 139–153. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • (Kent) Sheng Yao Cheng
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate Institute of EducationNational Chung Cheng UniversityChiayiRepublic of China

Personalised recommendations